Abstract
Businesses do not operate in a vacuum. They are subject to legal requirements and industry practices; they require resources to manufacture products and/or render services; they operate in an environment from which they draw their resources and which may be affected by their activities; and they operate in a community from which they draw their work force and which may also be impacted by their activities. Corporate environmental accounting is one of the tools that can be used by businesses to address these challenges. For an organisation to apply environmental accounting it must make business sense. Implementing environmental accounting may require resources. Therefore, a business must weigh up the benefits and costs thereof.
This paper discusses the four elements of corporate environmental accounting, i.e. environmental management accounting, environmental financial accounting, environmental reporting and environmental financial auditing. The potential benefits that can be derived from each of these elements are discussed. Many benefits can be reaped from implementing different elements of corporate environmental accounting. Some benefits enhance internal efficiency and competitive advantage, whilst others enhance legitimisation and stakeholder relations.
This paper also argues that for the full benefits of corporate environmental accounting to be reaped the elements of environmental accounting should be integrated with each other and in the day-to-day business of an organisation. The linkages and interactions among the elements of corporate environmental accounting as well as the linkages between corporate environmental accounting and the broader business processes of the company are discussed based on a diagrammatic model.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Bibliography
Adams, C., Frost, G., & Webber, W. (2004). Triple bottom line: A review of the literature. In A. Henriques & J. Richardson (Eds.), The triple bottom line: Does it all add up? (pp. 17–25). London: Earthscan.
Bebbington, J. (1997). Engagement, education and sustainability: A review essay on environmental accounting. Accounting, Auditing, and Accountability Journal, 10(3), 365–381.
Benn, S., & Probert, J. (2006). Incremental change towards sustainability. In S. Schaltegger & M. Wagner (Eds.), Managing the business case for sustainability (pp. 542–552). Sheffield: Greenleaf.
Berman, S. L., Wicks, A. C., Kotha, S., & Jones, T. M. (1999). Does stakeholder orientation matter? The relationship between stakeholder management models and firm financial performance. Academy of Management Journal, 42(5), 488–506.
Berry, M. A., & Rondinelli, D. A. (1998). Proactive corporate environmental management: A new industrial revolution. Academy of Management Executive, 12(2), 1–13.
Buhr, N. (2002). A structuration view on the initiation of environmental reports. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 13, 17–38.
Carpentier, C. L., Patterson, Z., & Malthouse, J. (2003). Environmental disclosures in financial statements: New developments and emerging issues. New York: Commission for environmental co–operation.
Cerin, P. (2002). Communication in corporate environmental reports. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 9(1), 46–66.
Clarke, J., & Gibson-Sweet, M. (1999). The use of corporate social disclosures in the management of reputation and legitimacy: A cross-sectoral analysis of UK top 100 companies. Business Ethics: A European Review, 18(1), 5–13.
Cormier, D., & Magnan, M. (1997). Investors’: assessment of implicit environmental liabilities: An empirical investigation. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 16(2), 215–241.
De Villiers, C. J. (1998). The willingness of South Africans to support more green reporting. South African Journal of Economic and Management Sciences, 1(1), 145–167.
Ditz, D., Ranganathan, R., & Banks, D. (1995). Green ledgers: Case studies in environmental accounting. Washington, DC: World Resources Institute.
Doane, D. (2004). Good intentions—bad outcomes? The broken promise of CSR reporting. In A. Henriques & J. Richardson (Eds.), The triple bottom line: Does it all add up? (pp. 81–88). London: Earthscan.
Donaldson, T., & Preston, L. E. (1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence, and implications. Academy of Management Review, 20, 65–91.
Edwards, P., Birkin, F., & Woodward, D. (2002). Financial comparability and environmental diversity: An international context. Business Strategy and the Environment, 11(6), 343–359.
Elkington, J. (1994). Towards the sustainable corporation: Win-win-win business strategies for sustainable development. California Management Review, 36(2), 90–100.
Elkington, J. (2004). Enter the triple bottom line. In A. Henriques & J. Richardson (Eds.), The triple bottom line: Does it all add up? (pp. 1–16). London: Earthscan.
Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Freedman, M., & Stagliano, A. J. (1991). Differences in social-cost disclosures: A market test of investor reactions. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 4(1), 68–83.
Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) (2002). Sustainability reporting guidelines (2nd version). Amsterdam: Global Reporting Initiative.
Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) (2006). Sustainability reporting guidelines (3rd version). Amsterdam: Global Reporting Initiative.
Gray, R., Bebbington, J., & Walters, D. (1993). Accounting for the environment. New York: Markus Wiener.
Gray, R., Kouhy, R., & Lavers, D. S. (1995). Corporate social and environmental reporting: A review of the literature and a longitudinal study of UK disclosure. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 8(2), 47–77.
Hart, S. L. (1995). A natural-resource-based view of the firm. Academy of Management Review, 20(4), 986–1014.
Hedberg, C. J., & von Malmborg, F. (2003). The global reporting initiative and corporate sustainability reporting in Swedish companies. Corporate Social-Responsibility and Environmental Management, 10(3), 153–164.
Howes, R. (2004). Environmental cost accounting: Coming of age? Tracking organisational performance towards environmental sustainability. In A. Henriques & J. Richardson (Eds.), The triple bottom line: Does it all add up? (pp. 99–112). London: Earthscan.
Institute of Directors (2002). King report on corporate governance for South Africa 2002. Johannesburg: Institute of Directors.
International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) (2004). Framework for the preparation and presentation of financial statements in International Accounting Standards Board. International Financial Reporting Standards, 1A, 19–46.
IAASB (1998). International audit practice statement 1010: The consideration of environmental matters in the audit of financial statements. New York: International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board.
International Federation of Accountants (IFAC) (2005). International guidance document: Environmental management accounting. New York: International Federation of Accountants.
Julian, F. W., & Nel, C. (2003). Managerial accounting, vol. 1 (2nd ed.). Centurion: Imprenta.
King, A., & Lenox, M. (2002). Exploring the locus of profitable pollution reduction.Management Science, 48(2), 289–299.
KPMG (2005). KPMG international survey of corporate responsibility reporting 2005. Amsterdam: KPMG Global Sustainability Services.
Lee, K. H., & Ball, R. (2006). Achieving sustainable corporate competitiveness. In S. Schaltegger & M. Wagner (Eds.), Managing the business case for sustainability (pp. 378–397). Sheffield: Greenleaf.
Li, Y, & McConomy, B. J. (1999). An empirical examination of factors affecting the timing of environmental accounting standard adoption and the impact on corporate valuation.Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance, 14(3), 279–319.
Lindblom, C. K. (1993). The implications of organisational legitimacy for corporate social performance and disclosure Paper presented at Critical Perspectives on Accounting conference, New York.
Madsen, H., & Ulhøi, J. P. (2003). Have trends in corporate environmental management influenced companies’ competitiveness? Greener Management International, 44(Winter), 75–88.
Maxwell, J. W. (1996). What to do when win-win won’t work: Environmental strategies for costly regulation. Business Horizons, 39(5), 60–63.
Monaghan, P. (2004). Put up or shut up. In A. Henriques & J. Richardson (Eds.), The triple bottom line: Does it all add up? (pp. 142–154). London: Earthscan.
Nehrt, C. (1996). Timing and intensity effects of environmental investments. Strategic Management Journal, 17(1), 535–547.
Nehrt, C. (1998). Maintainability of first-mover advantages when environmental regulations differ between countries. Academy of Management Review, 23(1), 77–97.
Newton-King, N. (2004). Sustainable development investments. In: The Enviropaedia 2004, p. 266.
Palmer, K., Oates, W. E., & Portney, P. R. (1995). Tightening environmental standards: The benefit-cost or the no-cost paradigm? Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9(4), 119–132.
Patten, D. M. (1992). Intra-industry environmental disclosures in response to the Alaskan oil spill: A note on legitimacy theory. Accounting, Organisations and Society, 17(5), 471–475.
Porritt, J. (2004). Locating the government’s bottom line. In A. Henriques & J. Richardson (Eds.), The triple bottom line: Does it all add up? (pp. 59–69). London: Earthscan.
Porter, M. E. (1991). America’s green strategy. Scientific American, 264, 168.
Porter, M. E., & Van der Linde, C. (1995). Toward a new conception of the environment-competitiveness relationship. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9(4), 97–118.
Preston, L. E. and Post, J. E. (1975), Private Management and Public Policy. Englewood Cliffs, N.J: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
Repetto, R., MacSkimming, A., & Isunza, G. C. (2002). Environmental disclosure requirements in the securities regulations and financial accounting standards of Canada, Mexico and the United States. New York: Commission for environmental co-operation.
Rogers, G. (2006). A looming environmental Enron? Environmental Finance, Dec 2005–Jan 2006, 21.
Schaltegger, S., & Sturm, A. (1990). Ökologische Rationalität. Die Unternehmung, 44(4), 273–290 (available only in German).
Schaltegger, S., & Wagner, M. (2006). Managing and measuring the business case for sustainability. Capturing the relationship between sustainability performance, business competitiveness and economic performance. In S. Schaltegger & M. Wagner (Eds.), Managing the business case for sustainability (pp. 1–27). Sheffield: Greenleaf.
Schaltegger, S., Bennett, M., & Burritt, R. (2006). Sustainability accounting and reporting. Dordrecht: Springer.
Shah, R. (2004). What a fine mess! Moving beyond simple puzzle-solving for sustainable development. In A. Henriques & J. Richardson (Eds.), The triple bottom line: Does it all add up? (pp. 89–98). London: Earthscan.
Shocker, A. D., & Sethi, S. P. (1974). An approach to incorporating social preferences in developing corporate action strategies. In S. P. Sethi (Eds.), The unstable ground: Corporate social policy in a dynamic society (pp. 67–80). Los Angeles, CA: Mellville.
Thorpe, J., & Prakash–Mani, K. (2003). Developing value: The business case for sustainability in emerging markets. Greener Management International, 44(Winter), 17–32.
Tilt, C. A. (1994). The influence of external pressure groups on corporate social disclosure: Some empirical evidence. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 7(4), 47–72.
UNDSD (2001). Environmental management accounting: Policies and linkages. New York: United Nations Division for Sustainable Development.
Wagner, M., Schaltegger, S., & Wehrmeyer, W. (2001). The relationship between the environmental and economic performance of companies: What does theory propose and what does empirical evidence tell us? Greener Management International, 34, 95–108.
Walley, N., & Whitehead, B. (1994). It’s not easy being green. Harvard Business Review, 72(3), 46–52.
Winter, G. (1988). Business and the Environment. Hamburg: McGraw-Hill.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2008 Springer Science + Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Godschalk, S.K.B. (2008). Does Corporate Environmental Accounting Make Business Sense?. In: Schaltegger, S., Bennett, M., Burritt, R.L., Jasch, C. (eds) Environmental Management Accounting for Cleaner Production. Eco-Efficiency in Industry and Science, vol 24. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8913-8_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8913-8_13
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-8912-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-8913-8
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)