Skip to main content

Geometrical Approaches to Active Learning

  • Conference paper

Learning from examples is a key property of autonomous agents. In our contribution, we want to focus on a particular class of strategies which are often referred to as “optimal experimental design“ or “active learning“. Learning machines, which employ these strategies, request examples which are maximal “informative“ for learning a predictor rather than “passively“ scanning their environment. There is a large body of empirical evidence, that active learning is more efficient in terms of the required number of examples. Hence, active learning should be preferred whenever training examples are costly to obtain. In our contribution, we will report new results for active learning methods which we are currently investigating and which are based on the geometrical concept of a version space. We will derive universal hard bounds for the prediction performance using tools from differential geometry, and we will also provide practical algorithms based on kernel methods and Monte-Carlo techniques. The new techniques are applied in psychoacoustical experiments for sound design.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. S. Fine, R. Gilad-Bachrach, and E. Shamir. Learning using query by committee, linear separation and random walks. Theoretical Computer Science, 284:25-51, 2002.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Y. Freund, H. S. Seung, E. Shamir, and N. Tishby. Selective sampling using the query by committee algorithm. Machine Learning, 28(2-3):133-168, 1997.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. M. Opper, H. S. Seung, and H. Sompolinsky. Query by committee. Proceedings of the Fifth Annual Workshop on Computational Learning Theory, pages 287-294, Pittsburgh, PA, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  4. S. Tong and D. Koller. Support vector machine active learning with applications to text clas- sification. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 2:45-66, 2001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. M.-F. Balcan, A. Beygelzimer, and J. Langford. Agnostic active learning. In ICML ’06: Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Machine Learning, pages 65-72, 2006. ACM Press, New York.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Francis R. Bach. Active learning for misspecified generalized linear models. In B. Sch ölkopf, J. Platt, and T. Hoffman, editors, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 19, pages 65-72. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  7. T. M. Mitchell. Generalization as search. Artificial Intelligence, 18(2):203-226, 1982.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. A. Banerjee, I. S. Dhillon, J. Ghosh, and S. Sra. Clustering on the unit hypersphere using von mises-fisher distributions. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 6:1345-1382, 2005.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. R. Herbrich, T. Graepel, C. Campbell, and C.K.I. Williams. Bayes Point Machines. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 1(4):245-278, 2001.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. P. Rujan. Playing Billiards in Version Space. Neural Computation, 9(1):99-122, 1997.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. G. Wahba. Spline Models for Observational Data, volume 59 of CBMS-NSF Regional Conference Series in Applied Mathematics. SIAM, Philadelphia, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  12. R. Herbrich. Learning Kernel Classifiers-Theory and Algorithms. Adaptive Computation and Machine Learning. MIT Press, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  13. F.-F. Henrich and K. Obermayer. Active learning by spherical subdivision. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 9:105-130, 2008.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. D. Rochesso and F. Fontana. The Sounding Object. Mondo Estremo, Firenze, Italy, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer Science + Business Media B.V

About this paper

Cite this paper

Adiloglu, K., Annies, R., Henrich, FF., Paus, A., Obermayer, K. (2008). Geometrical Approaches to Active Learning. In: Mahr, B., Huanye, S. (eds) Autonomous Systems – Self-Organization, Management, and Control. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8889-6_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8889-6_2

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-8888-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-8889-6

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics