Abstract
A concept for characterizing, predicting and recognizing threat situations is developed. The goal is to establish a systematic approach to automating some of these functions. The proposed approach addresses the fundamental problems of (a) sparse and ambiguous indicators of potential or actualized threat activity buried in massive background data; and (b) uncertainty in threat capabilities, intent and opportunities. Attack hypotheses are adaptively generated, evaluated and refined as the understanding of the situation evolves. This effort builds upon advances in Situation, Ontology and Estimation theory. Specific features of the approach include (a) fuzzy definition of situations and relationships; (b) integration of diverse inference bases: logical/semantic, causal, conventional, etc.; and (c) context-conditioned reasoning with uncertain evidence formulated in terms of “probabilistic infons.”
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Barwise J, Perry J. 1983. Situations and Attitudes. Cambridge, MA: Bradford Books, MIT Press.
Bowman CL, Steinberg AN. 2001. A systems engineering approach for implementing data fusion systems. In: Handbook of Multisensor Data Fusion, Hall DL, Llinas J, editors. London: CRC Press.
Curry H, Feys R. 1974. Combinatory Logic, Volume 1. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Devlin K. 1991. Logic and Information. Cambridge: Press Syndicate of the University of Cambridge.
Khalil A. 2005. Computational Learning and Data-Driven Modeling for Water Resource Management and Hydrology [dissertation]. Utah State University.
Little E, Rogova G, Boury-Brisset AC. 2005. Theoretical Foundations of Threat Ontology for Data Fusion Applications, DRDC, Valcatier TR-2005-269.
Nozawa ET. 2000. Peircean Semeiotic: a new engineering paradigm for automatic and adaptive intelligent systems. In: Proceedings of the FUSION’2003-3th Conference on Multisource-Multisensor Information Fusion, Paris.
Pearl J. 1988. Probabilistic Reasoning in Intelligent Systems: Networks of Plausible Inference. San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.
Steinberg AN, Bowman CL, White FE. 1998. Revisions to the JDL Model. In: Joint NATO/IRIS Conference Proceedings; 1998 Oct.; Quebec. Reprinted in: Sensor Fusion: Architectures, Algorithms and Applications. Proceedings of the SPIE, Volume 3719; 1999; Quebec.
Steinberg AN, Bowman CL. 2004. Rethinking the JDL data fusion model. In: Proceedings of the 2004 MSS National Symposium on Sensor and Data Fusion, Volume 1; 2004 June; Columbia.
Steinberg AN. 2005. Threat assessment technology development. In: Proceedings of the Fifth International and Interdisciplinary Conference on Modeling and Using Context (CONTEXT’05); 2005 July; Paris.
White FE. 1988. A Model for Data Fusion. In: Proceedings of the First National Symposium on Sensor Fusion, Volume 2. GACIAC, IIT Research Institute; Chicago. p 143–158.
Yedidia JS, Freeman WT, Weiss Y. 2002. Understanding belief propagation and its generalizations. In: Exploring Artificial Intelligence in the New Millennium, Lakemeyer G, Nebel B, editors. San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2009 Springer Science + Business Media B.V.
About this paper
Cite this paper
Steinberg, A.N. (2009). An Approach to Threat Assessment. In: Shahbazian, E., Rogova, G., DeWeert, M.J. (eds) Harbour Protection Through Data Fusion Technologies. NATO Science for Peace and Security Series C: Environmental Security. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8883-4_16
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8883-4_16
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-8882-7
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-8883-4
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)