Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Learning at the Macro Level: The Role of Practical Work

  • Chapter
Multiple Representations in Chemical Education

Part of the book series: Models and Modeling in Science Education ((MMSE,volume 4))

Abstract

Contact with concrete examples of substances, their reactions and other properties, through the laboratory and other practical activities, is an integral part of chemical education. In this chapter, attention is paid to alternatives to the expository instruction, which has been criticized for placing little emphasis on thinking. Consideration is given to inquiry and project-based laboratories, problem solving, context-based approaches and student cooperative practical activities. Central to laboratory work is the proper observation of phenomena. Content knowledge is crucial for the proper interpretation of observations. On the other hand, failure by students to notice or record all observations, as well as overloading of working memory are main problems. Methods are discussed for directing students’ attention to the important observational stimuli in experiments; demonstrations are particularly helpful in this. Concrete experiences may be a prerequisite for a conceptual understanding of chemistry, but this understanding is eventually provided through the submicroscopic and symbolic levels. Connection of the macro level with the other two levels is an integral but difficult task. Ways to achieve the desired macro to submicro and symbolic transition are given consideration; history of science can be of great value here. The chapter concludes with some future perspectives for practical work.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Abraham, M. R., Craolice, M. S., Palmer Graves, A., Aldhamash, A. H., Kihega, J. G., Palma Gal, J. G., & Varghese, V. (1997). The nature and state of general laboratory courses offered by colleges and universities in the United States. Journal of Chemical Education, 74, 591–594.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abraham, M., Williamson, V., & Westbrook, S. (1994). A cross-age study of the understanding of five chemistry concepts. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31, 147–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adar, L. (1969). A theoretical framework for the study of motivation in education. Jerusalem: The Hebrew University School of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Association for the Advancement of Science (1989 & 1990). Project 2061: Science for all Americans. Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashkenazi, G., & Weaver, G. C. (2007). Using lecture demonstrations to promote the refinement of concepts: The case of teaching solvent miscibility. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 8, 186–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ault, A. (2002). What’s wrong with cookbooks. Journal of Chemical Education, 79, 1177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ault, A. (2004). What’s wrong with cookbooks (author’s reply). Journal of Chemical Education, 81, 1569.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, J., & Lubben, F. (2006). Context-based chemistry: The Salters approach. International Journal of Science Education, 28, 999–1015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, S. W., & O’Neale, K. (1998). Skills development and practical work in chemistry. University Chemistry Education, 2, 58–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Zvi, R., Silberstein, J., & Mamlok, R. (1990). Macro-micro relationships: A key to the world of chemistry. In P. L. Lijnse, P. Licht, W. DeVos, & A. J. Warlo (Eds.), Relating macroscopic phenomena to microscopic particles (pp. 183–197). Utrecht: CD-Beta Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blosser, P. (1980). A critical review of the role of the laboratory in science teaching. Columbus OH: Center for Science and Mathematics Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bodner, G. M. (2001). Why lecture demonstrations are ‘exocharmic’ for both students and their instructors. University Chemistry Education, 5, 31–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowen, C. W., & Phelps, A. J. (1997). Demonstration-based cooperative testing in general chemistry: A broader assessment-of-learning technique. Journal of Chemical Education, 74, 715–719.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brattan, D, Mason, D., & Best, A. J. (1999). Changing the nature of physical chemistry practical work. University Chemistry Education, 3, 59–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bretz, S. L. (2001). Novak’s theory of education: Human constructivism and meaningful learning. Journal of Chemical Education, 78, 1107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brook, A., Briggs, H., & Driver, R. (1984). Aspects of secondary students’ understanding of the particulate nature of matter. University of Leeds: Centre for Studies in Science and Mathematics Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryce, T. G. K., & Robertson, I. J. (1985). What can they do? A review of practical assessment in science. Studies in Science Education, 12, 1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buckley, J. G., & Kempa, R. F. (1971). Practical work in sixth-form chemistry courses: An enquiry. School Science Review, 53(182) 24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bulte, A. M. W., Westbroek, H. B., de Jong, O., & Pilot, A. (2006). A research approach to designing chemistry education using authentic practices as contexts. International Journal of Science Education, 28, 1063–1086.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buntine, M. A., Read, J. R., Barrie, S. C., Bucat, R. B. Crisp, G. T., George, A. V., Jamie, I. M., & Kable, S. H. (2007). Advancing Chemistry by Enhancing Learning in the Laboratory (ACELL): A model for providing professional and personal development and facilitating improved student laboratory learning outcomes. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 8,232–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Byers, W. (2002). Promoting active learning through small group laboratory classes. University Chemistry Education, 6,28–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deese, W., Ramsey, L. L, Walczyk, J., & Eddy, D. (2000). Using demonstration assessments to improve learning. Journal of Chemical Education, 77, 1511–1516.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Vos, W., & Verdonk, A.H. (1985). A new road to reactions, Part I. Journal of Chemical Education, 62, 238–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Domin, D. S. (1999a). A content analysis of general chemistry laboratory manuals for evidence of higher-order cognitive tasks. Journal of Chemical Education, 76, 109–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Domin, D. S. (1999b). A review of laboratory instruction styles. Journal of Chemical Education, 76, 543–547.

    Google Scholar 

  • Domin, D. S. (2007). Students’ perceptions of when conceptual development occurs during laboratory instruction. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 8, 14–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doran, R. L., Lawrenz, F., & Helgeson, S. (1994). Research on assessment in science. In D. Gabel (ed.), Handbook of research on science teaching and learning (pp. 388–442). New York, NY: MacMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duncan-Hewitt, W., Mount, D. L., & Apple, D. A. (1995). A handbook on cooperative learning (2nd ed.). Corvallis, OR: Pacific Crest.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fay, M. E., Grove, N. P., Towns, M. H., & Bretz, S. L. (2007). A rubric to characterize inquiry in the undergraduate chemistry laboratory. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 8, 212–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flynn, A. E., & Klein, J. P. (2001). The influence of discussion groups in a case-based learning environment. Education Technology Research and Development, 49(3),71–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gabel, D. L., Sherwood, R. D., & Enochs, L. (1984). Problem-solving skills of high school chemistry students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 21, 211–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, P., & Gauld, C. (1990). Labwork and students’ attitudes. In E. Hegarty-Hazel (Ed.), The school laboratory and the science curriculum (pp. 132–156). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garnett, P. J., Garnett, P. J., & Hackling, M. W. (1995). Refocusing the chemistry lab: A case for laboratory-based investigations. Australian Science Teachers Journal, 41 (2),26-32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Georgiadou, A., & Tsaparlis, G. (2000). Chemistry teaching in lower secondary school with methods based on: (a) psychological theories; (b) the macro, representational, and submicro levels of chemistry. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 1, 217–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, J. K. (2006). On the nature of ‘‘context’’ in chemical education. International Journal of Science Education, 28, 957–976.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gott, R., & Mashiter, J. (1991). Practical work in science: A task-based approach? In B. Woolnough (Ed.), Practical science (pp. 53–66). Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunstone, R. F. & Champagne, A. B. (1990). Promoting conceptual change in the laboratory. In E. Hegarty-Hazel (Ed.), The student laboratory and the science curriculum (pp. 159–182). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutwill-Wise, J. P. (2001). The impact of active and context-based learning to introductory chemistry courses. Journal of Chemical Education, 78, 684–690.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hackling, M. W., & Garnett, P. J., (1995). The development of expertise in science investigative skills. Australian Science Teachers Journal, 41(4), 80–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haidar, A., & Abraham, M. (1991). A comparison of applied and theoretical knowledge of concepts based on the particulate nature of matter. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28,919–938.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, C., Mulhall, P., Berry, A., Loughran, J., & Gunstone, R. (2000). What is the purpose of this experiment? Or can students learn something from doing experiments? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37, 655–675.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herron, J. D. (1978). Piaget in the classroom. Journal of Chemical Education, 55, 165–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hills, G., Holman, J., Lazonby, J., Raffan, J., & Waddington, D. (1989). Introducing chemistry: The Salters’ approach. London: Heinemann Educational Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirvonnen P. E., & Virii, J. (2002). Physics student teachers’ ideas about the objectives of practical work. Science & Education, 11, 305–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hodson, D. (1986). The nature of scientific observation. School Science Review, 68(242), 17–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodson, D. (1990). A critical look at practical work in school science. School Science Review, 70(256), 33–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodson, D. (1993). Re-thinking old ways: Towards a more critical approach to practical work in school science. Studies in Science Education, 22, 85–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hodson, D. (1996). Laboratory work as scientific method: Three decades of confusion and distortion. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 28, 115–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofstein, A. (2004). The laboratory in chemistry education: Thirty years of experience with developments, implementation and evaluation. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 5, 247–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofstein, A., & Kempa, R. (1985). Motivational strategies in science ecuation: Attempt at an analysis. European Journal of Science Education, 7, 221–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofstein, A., & Kesner, M. (2006). Industrial chemistry and school chemistry: Making chemistry studies more relevant. International Journal of Science Education, 28, 1017–1039.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofstein, A., & Lunetta,V. N. (1982). The role of the laboratory in science teaching: Neglected aspects of research. Review of Educational Research, 52, 201–217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofstein, A., & Lunetta, V. (2004). The laboratory in science education: Foundations for the twenty-first century. Science Education, 88, 25–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofstein, A., & Mamlok-Naaman, R. (2007). The laboratory in science education: The state of the art. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 8, 105–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofstein, A., Navon, O., Kipnis, M., & Mamlok-Naaman, R. (2005). Developing students’ ability to ask more and better questions resulting from inquiry-type chemistry laboratories. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42, 791–806.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunter, C., Wardell, & Wilkins, H. (2000). Introducing first-year students to some skills of investigatory laboratory work. University Chemistry Education, 4, 14–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., & Smith, K. A. (1991). Active learning cooperation in the learning classroom. Edina, MN: Interaction Book Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnstone, A. H. (1991). Thinking about thinking. International Newsletter on Chemical Education, 6, 7–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnstone, A. H. (1993). Introduction. In C. Wood & R. Sleet (Eds.), Creative problem solving in chemistry (pp. iv–vi). London: The Royal Society of Chemistry.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnstone, A. H. (2000). Teaching of chemistry – Logical or psychological? Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 1, 9–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnstone, A. H. (2007). Science education: We know the answers, let’s look at the problems. Proceedings of the 5th Greek Conference “Science education and new technologies in education”, Vol. 1, pp. 1–11. http://www.kodipheet.gr/fifth_conf/pdf_synedriou/teyxos_A/1_kentrikes_omilies/1_KO-4-Johnstone.pdf

  • Johnstone, A. H., & Al-Shuaili, A. (2001). Learning in the laboratory: Some thoughts from the literature. University Chemistry Education, 5, 42–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnstone, A. H., & Wham, A. J. B. (1982). The demands of practical work. Education in Chemistry, 19(3), 71–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kampourakis, C., & Tsaparlis, G. (2003). A study of the effect of a practical activity on problem solving in chemistry. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 4, 319–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kautz, C. H., Lovrude, M. E., Herron, P. R. L., & McDermott, L. C. (1999). Research on student understanding of the ideal gas law. Proceedings, 2nd International Conference of the European Science Education Research Association (ESERA), Kiel, Germany, 1,83–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kempa R. (1986). Assessment in science (Ch. 5). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kempa, R. F., & Diaz, M. M. (1990a). Motivational traits and preferences for different instructional modes in science – Part 1: Students’ motivational traits. International Journal of Science Education, 12, 195–201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kempa, R. F., & Diaz, M. M. (1990b). Students’ motivational traits and preferences for different instructional modes in science education – Part 2. International Journal of Science Education, 12, 205–216.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kempa, R. F., & Ward, J. E. (1975). The effect of different modes of task orientational attainment in practical chemistry. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 12,69–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kempa, R. F., & Ward, J. E. (1988). Observational thresholds in school chemistry. International Journal of Science Education, 10, 275–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kennepohl, D. (2007). Using home-laboratory kits to teach general chemistry. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 8, 337–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kerr, J. F. (1963). Practical work in school science: An account of an inquiry into the nature and purpose of practical work in school science teaching in England and Wales. Leicester, UK: Leicester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klahr, D. (2000). Exploring science. The cognition and development of discovery processes. Cambridge, MA: MIT press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolioulis, D., & Tsaparlis, G. (2007). Eighth-grade chemistry, with emphasis on macroscopic-constructivist approach and the meaningful introduction of the concepts of molecule and atom – Teaching book and its preliminary evaluation by teachers (in Greek). Proceedings of the 5th Greek Conference ‘‘Science education and new technologies in education’’, 2,680–689.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krajcik, J., Mamlok, R., & Hug, B. (2001). Modern content and the enterprise of science: Science education in the 20th century. In L. Corno (Ed.), Education across a century: The centennial volume (pp. 205–238). Chicago, Illinois: National Society for the Study of Education(NSSE).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lagowski, J. J. (1990). Entry-level science courses: The weak link. Journal of Chemical Education, 67, 541.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laws, P. M. (1996). Undergraduate science education: A review of research. Studies in Science Education, 28, 1–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lazarowitz, R., & Tamir, P. (1994). Research on using laboratory instruction in science. In D. L. Gabel (ed.), Handbook of research on science teaching (pp. 94–130). New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leach, L. (1998). Teaching about the world of science in the laboratory: The influence of students’ ideas. In J. Welllington (Ed.), Practical work in school science: Which way now? (pp. 52–68). New York:Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, O., Eichinger, D. C., Anderson, C. W., & Berkheime, G. D. (1993). Changing middle school student’s conceptions of matter and molecules. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30, 249–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levere, T. H. (2001). Transforming matter – A history of chemistry from alchemy to the buckyball. Baltimore and London: John Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liapi, I., & Tsaparlis, G. (2007). Lower-secondary students perform themselves creative experiments on acids-bases that are connected to daily life – A first evaluation and comparison with conventional experiments (in Greek). Proceedings of the 5th Greek Conference ‘‘Science education and new technologies in education’’, 2, 725–734.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lijnse, P. L., Licht, P., DeVos, W., & Warlo, A. J. (Eds.) (1990). Relating macroscopic phenomena to microscopic particles. Utrecht: CD-β Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lunetta, V. N. (1998). The school science laboratory: Historical perspectives and centers for contemporary teaching. In P. Fensham (Ed.), Developments and dilemmas in science education (pp. 169–188). London: Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lunetta V. N., Hofstein, A., & Clough, M (2007). Learning and teaching in the school science laboratory: An analysis of research, theory, and practice. In N. Lederman & S. Abel (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 393–441). Mahwah, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mc Donnell, C., O’Connor, C., & Seery, M. K. (2007). Developing practical chemistry skills by means of student-driven problem based learning mini-projects. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 8, 130–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McRobbie, C. J., & Thomas, G. P. (2001). Changing the learning environment for enhanced explaining and understanding in a year 12 chemistry class. Learning Environments Research, 3, 209–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meester, M. A. M., & Maskill, R. (1994). Second year practical classes in undergraduate chemistry courses in England and Wales. London: Royal Society of Chemistry.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meheut, M., & Chomat, A. (1990). The bounds of children’s atomimism: An attempt to make children build up a particulate model of matter. In P. L. Lijnse, P. Licht, W. DeVos, & A. J. Warlo (Eds.), Relating macroscopic phenomena to microscopic particles (pp. 266–282). Utrecht: CD-β Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Millar, R. (1990). Making sense: What use are particle ideas to children. In P. L. Lijnse, P. Licht, W. DeVos, & A. J. Warlo (Eds.), Relating macroscopic phenomena to microscopic particles (pp. 283–293). Utrecht: CD-β Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Millar, R., & Driver, R. (1987). Beyond processes. Studies in Science Education, 14, 33–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monteyne, K., Mark S., & Cracolice, M. S. (2004). What’s wrong with cookbooks (reply to Ault). Journal of Chemical Education, 81, 1559–1560.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council (1996). National science education standards. Washington DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council (2000). Inquiry and the national science education standards. Washington DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neber, H., & Anton, M.-A. (2008). Promoting pre-experimental activities in high-school chemistry: Focusing on the role of students’ epistemic questions. International Journal of Science Education, 309(13), 1801–1822.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neber, H., & Heumann-Ruprecht, D. (2006). Discovering learning by experimenting in chemistry. In I. Herztstell (Ed.), From the Nurenberg funnel to the laptop (pp. 289–298). Bonn, Germany: DVP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, P. (2002). Teaching chemistry progressively: From substances, to atoms and molecules, to electrons and nuclei. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 3,215–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niaz, M.. (1993). ‘Progressive problemshifts’ between different research programs in science education: A Lakatosian perspective. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30, 757–765.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Novak, J. D. (1998). Learning, creating, and using knowledge. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Novick, S., & Nussbaum, J. (1981). Pupils understanding of the nature of matter: A cross age study. Science Education, 65, 187–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nurrenbern, S. C., & Robinson, W. R. (1997). Cooperative learning: A bibliography. Journal of Chemical Education, 74, 623–524.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, J. (1998). History and philosophy of science and the preparation for constructivist teaching: The case of particle theory. In J. J. Mintzes, J. H. Wandersee, & J. D. Novak (Eds.), Teaching science for understanding – A human constructivist view (Ch. 2). London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parchmann, I., Gräsel, C., Baer, A., Nentwig, P., Demuth, R., Ralle, B., & the Chik Project Group. (2006). “Chemie in Kontext”. A symbiotic implementation of a context-based teaching and learning approach. International Journal of Science Education, 28, 1041–1062.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Penner, D. E., Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (1998). From physical models to biomechanics: A design based modeling approach. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 7, 429–449.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pickering, M. (1987). What is going on in students’ head in lab? Journal of Chemical Education, 64, 521–523.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Polman, J. L. (1999). Designing project-based science: Connecting learners through guided inquiry. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pomeroy, D. (1993). Implication of teacher beliefs about the nature of science: Comparisons of the beliefs of scientists, secondary teachers, and elementary teachers. Science Education, 77, 261–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Read, J. R., & Kable, S. H. (2007). Educational analysis of the first year chemistry experiment ‘Thermodynamics Think-In’: An ACELL experiment. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 8, 255–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reid, N., & Shah, I. (2007). The role of laboratory work in university chemistry. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 8, 172–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roth, W. M., & Roychoudhury, A. (1993). The development of science process skills in authentic contexts. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30, 127–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rudd II, J. A., Greenbowe, T. J., Hand, B. M., & Legg, M. J. (2001). Using the science writing heuristic to move toward an inquiry-based laboratory curriculum: An example from physical equilibrium. Journal of Chemical Education, 78, 1680–1686.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, A. T. (2006). Contextualised chemical education: The American experience. International Journal of Science Education, 28, 977–998.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shilandd, T. W. (1999). Constructivism: The implications for laboratory work. Journal of Chemical Education, 76, 107–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shitbley, Jr. I. A., & Zimmaro, D. M. (2002). The influence of collaborative learning on student attitudes and performance in an introductory chemistry laboratory. Journal of Chemical Education, 79, 745–748.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stamovlasis, D., Dimos, A., & Tsaparlis G. (2006). A study of group interactions in learning lower secondary physics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43, 556–576.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stamovlasis, D., & Tsaparlis, G. (2001). Application of complexity theory to an information processing model in science education, Nonlinear Dynamics in Psychology and Life Sciences, 5, 267–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sutton, A. (1985). An introduction to assessment and evaluation processes and procedures. Cardiff: University College.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tobin, K. G. (1990). Research on science laboratory activities; in pursuit of better questions and answers to improve learning. School Science and Mathematics, 90, 403–418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tobin, K. G., & Capie, W. (1982). Relationships between formal reasoning ability, locus of control, academic engagement, and integrated process skill development. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 19, 113–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toomet, R, DePierro, E., & Garafalo, F. (2001). Helping students to make inferences about the atomic realm by delaying the presentation of atomic structure. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 2, 129–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trumper, R. (2003). The physics laboratory: A historical overview and future perspectives. Science & Education, 12, 645–670.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsai, C.-C. (1998). An analysis of scientific epistemological beliefs and learning orientations of Taiwanese eighth graders. Science Education, 82, 473–489.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsaparlis, G. (1989). What a single molecule does not look like – Two analogies and their effect on learning [Abstracts]. American Chemical Society, 198, 176 (Ched).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsaparlis, G. (1997). Atomic and molecular structure in chemical education – A critical analysis from various perspectives of science education. Journal of Chemical Education, 74,922–925.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsaparlis, G. (1998) Dimensional analysis and predictive models in problem solving, International Journal of Science Education, 20, 335–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsaparlis, G., & Angelopoulos, V. (2000) A model of problem solving: its operation, validity and usefulness in the case of organic-synthesis problems. Science Education, 84,131–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsaparlis, G., & Gorezi, M. (2005). Modification of a conventional expository physical chemistry laboratory to accommodate an inquiry/project-based component: Method and students’ evaluation. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 5, 111–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsaparlis, G., & Gorezi, M. (2007). Addition of a project-based component to a conventional expository physical chemistry laboratory. Journal of Chemical Education, 84, 668–670.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsaparlis, G., & Zoller, U. (2003). Evaluation of higher vs. lower-order cognitive skills-type examinations in chemistry: Implications for university in-class assessment and examinations University Chemistry Education, 7(2), 50–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vallarino, L. M., Polo, D. L., & Esperdy, K. (2001). Development of a research-oriented inorganic chemistry laboratory course. Journal of Chemical Education, 78, 228–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. (1962). Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, C. S., Tsoi, M. Y., Calkin, J., & Darely, M. (2003). Learning from inquiry-based laboratories in nonmajor biology: An interpretive study of the relationships among inquiry experience, epistemologies, and conceptual growth. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40, 986–1024.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Welzel, M. (1999). A study of factors determining the difficulty and interestingness of physics problems. Proceedings, 2nd International Conference of ESERA, Kiel, Germany, 2, 369–371.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, R., Gunstone, R., Elterman, E., Macdonald, I., McKittrick, B., Mills, D., & Mulhall, P. (1995). Students’ perceptions of teaching and learning in first-year university physics. Research in Science Education, 25, 465–476.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimrot, R., & Ashkenazi, G. (2007). Interactive lecture demonstrations: A tool for exploring and enhancing conceptual change. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 8, 197–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zoller U. (1993). Are lecture and learning compatible? Maybe for LOCS unlikely for HOCS. Journal of Chemical Education, 70, 195–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zoller, U., & Pushskin, D. (2007). Matching higher-order cognitive skills (HOCS) promotion goals with problem-based laboratory practice in a freshman organic chemistry course. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 8, 155–171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zoller, U., & Tsaparlis, G. (1997). Higher and lower-order cognitive skills: The case of chemistry. Research in Science Education, 27, 117–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece

    Georgios Tsaparlis

Authors
  1. Georgios Tsaparlis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Georgios Tsaparlis .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. 1 Croswell Cottages, Goose Lane, Mayford Woking, Surrey

    John K. Gilbert

  2. 1 Croswell Cottages, Mayford, UK, GU22 0NW

    John K. Gilbert

  3. Curtin University of Technology Science & Mathematics Education Centre, Perth, WA, 6001, Australia

    David Treagust

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Tsaparlis, G. (2009). Learning at the Macro Level: The Role of Practical Work. In: Gilbert, J.K., Treagust, D. (eds) Multiple Representations in Chemical Education. Models and Modeling in Science Education, vol 4. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8872-8_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation