Abstract
The value of models, modelling and visualisation as a basis for developing an understanding of the nature of and the relations between the three levels of representation is discussed. The requirement for and problems in the development of metavisualisation (a fluent capability in visualisation) are presented. Student practical work, closely associated with teacher questioning, is advocated as a way of developing these skills. A ‘Model of Modelling’ is presented. In order to validate this model, it was applied to the teaching of ‘chemical equilibrium’, this being a very important topic for which student misconceptions are well documented. Data were collected from six lessons in which the model was applied excessively with respect to the nitrogen dioxide/dinitrogen tetroxide and chromate/dichromate systems. Students developed a good understanding of chemical equilibrium, as shown by the absence of common misconceptions in an end-of-course attainment test. Students acquired an appreciation of the relationship between the three levels of representation. The value of the model of modelling, with its associated pedagogy as a support for the acquisition and use of metavisual capability, was established.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Literature About Students’ Conceptions
Ainsworth, S. (2008). The educational value of multiple-representations when learning complex scientific concepts. In J. K. Gilbert, M. Reiner, & M. Nakhleh (Eds.), Visualization: Theory and practice in science education. Dordrecht: Springer.
Bennett, J. (2003). Teaching and learning science: A guide to recent research and its applications. London: Continuum Press.
Boulter, C. J., & Buckley, B. C. (2000). Constructing a typology of models for science education. In J. K. Gilbert & C. J. Boulter (Eds.), Developing models in science education (pp. 41–57). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Clement, J. (1990). Learning via model construction and criticism. In J. A. Glover, R. R. Ronning, & C. R. Reynolds (Eds.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 341–381). New York: Plenum.
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2000). Research methods in education (5th ed.). London and New York: RoutledgeFalmer.
Ferreira, P. F. M. (2006). Modelagem e suas Contribuições para o Ensino de Ciências: Uma análise no estudo de equilíbrio químico. Unpublished Masters Dissertation, Faculdade de Educação da Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte.
Ferreira, P. F. M., & Justi, R. (2005). From chemical reaction to chemical equilibrium: Learning through modelling. Paper presented at the V Conference of the European Science Education Research Association, Barcelona, Spain, 28 August–01 September.
Gilbert, J. K. (2005). Visualization: A metacognitive skill in science and science education. In J. K. Gilbert (Ed.), Visualization in science education. Dordrecht: Springer.
Gilbert, J. K. (2008). Visualization: An emergent field of practice and enquiry in science education. In J. K. Gilbert, M. Reiner, & M. Nakhleh (Eds.), Visualization: Theory and practice in science education. Dordrecht: Springer.
Gilbert, J. K., Boulter, C. J., & Elmer, R. (2000). Positioning models in science education and in design and technology education. In J. K. Gilbert & C. J. Boulter (Eds.), Developing models in science education (pp. 3–17). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Halloun, I. A. (2004). Modeling theory in science education. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Hinton, M. E., & Nakhleh, M. B. (1999). Students’ microscopic, macroscopic, and symbolic representations of chemical reactions. The Chemical Educator, 4(4), 1–29.
Hodson, D. (1990). A critical look at practical work in school science. School Science Review, 71(256), 33–40.
Johnstone, A. H. (1982). Macro- and micro-chemistry. The School Science Review, 64(227), 377–379.
Justi, R. (2006). La Enseñanza de Ciencias Basada en la Elaboración de Modelos. Enseñanza de las Ciencias, 24(2), 173–184.
Justi, R., & Gilbert, J. K. (2002). Modelling, teachers’ views on the nature of modelling, and implications for the education of modellers. International Journal of Science Education, 24(4), 369–388.
Justi, R., & Mendonça, P. C. C. (2007). Modelling in order to learn an important sub-micro representation: the nature of the ionic bond. Paper presented at the VI Conference of the European Science Education Research Association, Malmö, Sweden, 21–25 August.
Kozma, R. B., & Russell, J. (1997). Multimedia and understanding: Expert and novice responses to different representations of chemical phenomena. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34(9), 949–968.
Mendonça, P. C. C., & Justi, R. (2005). Construção de Modelos no Ensino de Ligação Iônica. Paper presented at the V Brazilian National Science Educational Research Meeting, Bauru, SP, 28 November–03 December.
Morgan, M. S., & Morrison, M. (1999). Models as mediating instruments. In M. S. Morgan, & M. Morrison (Eds.), Models as mediators (pp. 10–38). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Treagust, D. F., Chittleborough, G., & Mamiala, T. L. (2003, March). Why models are advantageous to learning science. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Philadelphia.
van Driel, J. H., & Graber, W. (2002). The teaching and learning of chemical equilibrium. In J. K. Gilbert, O. de Jong, R. Justi, D. F. Treagust, & J.H. van Driel (Eds.), Chemical reaction: Towards research-based practice (pp. 271–292). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Vosniadou, S. (2002). Mental models in conceptual development. In L. Magnani & N. J. Nersessian (Eds.), Model-based reasoning: Science, technology, values (pp. 353–368). New York: Kluwer Academic and Plenum Publishers.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2009 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Justi, R., Gilbert, J.K., Ferreira, P.F.M. (2009). The Application of a ‘Model of Modelling’ to Illustrate the Importance of Metavisualisation in Respect of the Three Types of Representation. In: Gilbert, J.K., Treagust, D. (eds) Multiple Representations in Chemical Education. Models and Modeling in Science Education, vol 4. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8872-8_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8872-8_13
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-8871-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-8872-8
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)