Even a superficial reading of Aristotle's Physics shows how fundamentally our beliefs about the inanimate world differ from his. The Scientific Revolution overthrew his conception of the cosmos entirely. In stark contrast, his surviving works on biology give an overall impression of modernity. Biologists today think about organisms much as Aristotle did, asking similar questions and, in many cases, giving broadly similar (though much more detailed) answers. There are important differences, which came to be the battlegrounds in the ‘war of attrition’ against Aristotelianism that extended from the late 17th to the early 20th century. But the similarities are more immediately striking.
KeywordsScientific Revolution Spontaneous Generation Teleological Explanation Animal Spirit Aristotelian Notion
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Barnes J (ed) (1995) Cambridge Companion to Aristotle. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
- Downey G (1962) Aristotle: Dean of Early Science. Franklin Watts, New York.Google Scholar
- Gotthelf A, Lennox J (eds) (1987) Philosophical Issues in Aristotle's Biology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
- Gotthelf A (ed) (1985) Aristotle on Nature and Living Things. Philosophical and Historical Studies. Mathesis, Pittsburgh, PA.Google Scholar
- Pellegrin P (1986) Aristotle's Classification of Animals. Biology and the Conceptual Unity of the Aristotelian Corpus. University of California Press, Berkeley, CA.Google Scholar
- Preus A (1975) Science and Philosophy in Aristotle's Biological Works. Georg Olms, New York.Google Scholar