Skip to main content

Assessing Benefits of Slum Upgrading Programs in Second-Best Settings

  • Chapter
Urban Land Markets
  • 2683 Accesses

Abstract

Slum formation is occurring at unprecedented rates. A report by the United Nations Human Settlements Programme (UN-Habitat, 2003) estimated the number of slum dwellers in 2001 at almost 1 billion, about 32% of the global urban population. While the representation of slum dwellers in the urban population varies across regions, there is no doubt that slum formation is a daunting problem. Slum dwellers account for 71.9% of the urban population in Sub-Saharan Africa, 58% in Southcentral Asia, 36.4% in East Asia, and 32% in Latin America and the Caribbean. UN Secretary General Kofi Annan, in his foreword to the UN-Habitat report, warned that “if no serious action is taken, the number of slum dwellers worldwide is projected to rise over the next 30 years to about 2 billion” (p. v).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Ballard, C., & Fullerton, D. (1992). Distortionary taxes and the provision of public goods. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 6 (3), 117–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bertaud, A., & Brueckner, J. (2005). Analyzing building-height restrictions: Predicted impacts and welfare costs. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 35 (2), 109–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bovenburg, A. L., & Goulder, L. H. (1996). Optimal environmental taxation in the presence of other taxes: General-equilibrium analyses. American Economic Review, 86 (4), 985–1000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buckley, R., & Kalarickal, J. (Eds.). (2006). Thirty years of World Bank shelter lending: What have we learned? Directions in Development – Infrastructure series. Washington, DC: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clapham, E., Englund, P., Quigley, J., & Redfearn, C. L. (2004). Revisiting the past: Revision in repeat sales and hedonic indexes of house prices. Working Paper W04–005. University of California at Berkeley, Fisher Center for Real Estate and Urban Economics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Field, E., & Kremer, M. (2005). Impact evaluation for slum upgrading interventions. Washington, DC: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heikkila, E. (2004). Conceptual framework: Evaluation of policy alternatives for promoting equitable access to urban land in Brazil. World Bank, Cities Alliance, and Institute of Applied Economic Research (IPEA), Enabling Strategy for Moving Urban Upgrading to Scale in Brazil, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, J. V., & Venables, A. J. (2004). The dynamics of city formation: Finance and governance. London: Economic and Social Research Council; London School of Economics, Centre for Economic Performance.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayo, S. K. (1986). Sources of inefficiency in subsidized housing programs: A comparison of U.S. and German experience. Journal of Urban Economics, 20 (2), 229–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mills, E., & Simenauer, R. (1996). New hedonic estimates of regional constant quality house prices. Journal of Urban Economics, 39 (2), 209–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parry, I. W. H., & Oates, W. (1998). Policy analysis in a second best world. RFF Discussion Paper 98–48. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reiff, L. O., & Barbosa, A. L. (2005). Housing stock in Brazil: Estimation based on a hedonic price model. In Real estate indicators and financial stability: Proceedings of a joint conference organised by the BIS and the IMF in Washington DC, 27 – 28 October 2003 (pp. 257–270). BIS Papers, no. 21. Washington, DC: Bank for International Settlements.

    Google Scholar 

  • Serra, M. V., Dowall, D. E., Motta, D., & Donovan, M. (2004). Urban land markets and urban land development: An examination of three Brazilian cities—Brasília, Curitiba and Recife. Working Paper 2004–2003. University of California at Berkeley, Institute of Urban and Regional Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • UN-Habitat (United Nations Human Settlements Programme). (2003). The challenge of slums: Global report on human settlements 2003. London: Earthscan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wildasin, D. (1984). On public goods provision with distortionary taxation. Economic Inquiry, 22 (2), 227–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolverton, M. L., & Senteza, J. (2000). Hedonic estimates of regional constant quality house prices. Journal of Real Estate Research, 19 (3), 235–253.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank. (2002). Brazil: Progressive low-income housing—Alternatives for the poor. Report 22032-BR. Latin America and the Caribbean Region, Finance, Private Sector, and Infrastructure. Washington, DC: Author.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 World Bank

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Dasgupta, B., Lall, S.V. (2009). Assessing Benefits of Slum Upgrading Programs in Second-Best Settings. In: Lall, S.V., Freire, M., Yuen, B., Rajack, R., Helluin, JJ. (eds) Urban Land Markets. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8862-9_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics