Creating Conditions for Intercultural and International Learning and Teaching

  • H. Gesche Astrid
  • Makeham Paul

As tertiary institutions worldwide embrace broader conceptions of what it means to be ‘international’, there emerges a clearer imperative to deploy strategic approaches that address the cultural diversity of students in higher education. Thus far, activities have mainly been geared to broad definitions of cultural inclusivity and good teaching practices (Eisenchlas & Trevaskes, 2003). However, few concrete examples exist to inform effective curriculum (re)development and delivery. Indeed, the question of how best to design, implement and evaluate an innovative and creative international curriculum remains of great interest, especially in Australia (Curro & McTaggart, 2004; Beattie, 2004; Reid & Loxton, 2004; Ninnes & Hellstén, 2005). Of special importance in this context are the pedagogical practices that can facilitate the acquisition of ‘international’ and ‘intercultural’ skills, both in students and their educators.

This chapter presents the findings of a 2-year project on ‘Internationalising the Curriculum’ at one of Australia’s largest universities with over 38,000 students, including more than 5,000 international students from over hundred countries. One of the university’s key learning and teaching objectives is to create a high-quality, student-centred, international learning environment that equips graduates with skills and knowledge sufficient to operate successfully and harmoniously in an increasingly complex and globalised world. The project reported upon here comprised eight case studies, four of which are detailed in this chapter, which were designed to augment the university-wide approach to internationalising the curriculum. They demonstrate how diverse frameworks of reference and understanding may be mediated with integrity and sensitivity. The case studies involved a total of 1,587 students and fifteen educators situated in the faculties of creative industries, education and humanities. The student mix per class ranged from mainly domestic, to mixed (international/ domestic), to exclusively international students. One of the project outcomes is a set of pedagogical principles recommended for facilitating the development of intercultural and international perspectives and proficiencies in students.

This chapter is organised around three sections. The first provides a general discussion on internationalisation and associated pedagogies. The second describes a range of pedagogical strategies that case study leaders employed to assist their students to attain certain milestones on their road to intercultural competency. The final section discusses some of the underlying interdependent principles of effective teaching that are important in developing international and intercultural perspectives and skills in students. They will be structured along three categories: (1) cognitive, (2) affective, and (3) operational. The principles indicate that positive outcomes are primarily process-oriented and based on careful planning and implementation (see also Teekens, 2004; Deardorff, 2006).


International Student Student Teacher Creative Industry International Learn Intercultural Communication 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Andrusyszun, M. and Davie, L., 1995, Reflection as a Design Tool in Computer Mediated Education, presented at the Distance Education Conference, San Antonio, Texas (January 26)Google Scholar
  2. Beattie, K., 2004, Internationalising Teaching. Centre for the Study of Higher Education,Melbourne University, (18 December 2005); Scholar
  3. Bhabha, H., 2004, The Location of Culture, Routledge: New YorkGoogle Scholar
  4. Boud, D., Keogh, R. and Walker, D., 1985, What is reflection in learning? in Boud, D., Keogh R.and Walker, D., eds., Reflection: Turning Experience into Learning, Kogan Page: LondonGoogle Scholar
  5. Bradley, G., 2000, Developing globally-competent university teachers, Innovations in Education and Training International 37(3): 244–253Google Scholar
  6. Brew, F. P. and Cairns, D. R., 2004, Do culture or situational constraints determine choice of direct or indirect styles in intercultural workplace conflicts? International Journal of Intercultural Relations 28: 331–352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Butorac, A., ed., 1997, Quality in Practice: Internationalising the Curriculum and the Classroom.Curtin University of Technology: PerthGoogle Scholar
  8. Byram, M., Nichols, A. and Stevens, D., 2001, Introduction, in Byram, M., Nichols, A. and Stevens, D., eds., Developing Intercultural Competence in Practice, Multilingual Matters:ClevedonGoogle Scholar
  9. Collis, C., 2005, Internationalising the Curriculum Case Study Report: ‘Communication in the new economy’. Internal Report, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane,AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  10. Coulby, D., 2006, Intercultural education: theory and practice, Intercultural Education, 17(3):245–257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Curro, G. and McTaggart R., 2004, Supporting the Pedagogy of Internationalisation, presented at the 17th IDP Australian International Education Conference (21–24 October), Melbourne,Australia. (17 December 2005);
  12. Crichton, J., Paige, M., Papademetre, L. and Scarino, A., n.d., Integrated resources for intercul-tural teaching and learning in the context of internationalization in higher education, Report,Research Centre for Languages and Cultures Education, University of South Australia, (June12, 2006);
  13. Davis, N., Cho, M. O. and Hagenson, L., 2005, Intercultural competence and the role of technolgy in teacher education, Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 4(4),(Sept 14, 2007)
  14. Deardorff, D. K., 2006, Identification and assessment of intercultural competence as a student outcome of internationalization, Journal of Studies in International Education, 10(3):241–266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dewey, J., 1933, How We Think, Heath & Co: Boston, DC Google Scholar
  16. Dlaska, A., 2000, Integrating culture and language learning in institution-wide language programmes, Language, Culture and Curriculum, 13(3): 247–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Eisenchlas, S. and Trevaskes, S., 2003, Internationalisation at home: Some principles and pracices, in Liddicoat, A., Eisenchlas, S. and Trevaskes, S., eds., Australian Perspectives on Internationalising Education, Language Australia: MelbourneGoogle Scholar
  18. Flechsig, K.H., 2000, Interne Arbeitspapiere, Institut für interkulturelle Didaktik, Göttingen.(April 22, 2006); kflechs/iikdiaps2–00.htm
  19. Gattenhof, S., 2005, Internationalising the Curriculum Case Study Report. Internal Report.Queensland University of Technology: Brisbane, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  20. Gillham, B., 2000, Case Study Research Methods, Continuum: New YorkGoogle Scholar
  21. Gudykunst, W., 2003, Cross-Cultural and Intercultural Communication, Sage: Thousand OaksGoogle Scholar
  22. Gundara, J. S., 2000, Interculturalism, Education and Inclusion, Chapman: LondonGoogle Scholar
  23. Hall, J. K., 2002, Teaching and Researching Language and Culture, Longman: LondonGoogle Scholar
  24. Hanna, B. and Toohey, A., 2005, When internationalization meets assessment, presented at the Social Change in the 21st Century Conference, Centre for Social Change Research, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia, (October 28, 2006).
  25. Hellstén, M., 2002, Students in transition: needs and experiences of international students in Australia, presented at the 16th Australian International Education Conference, Hobart,Australia, (June 6, 2006);
  26. Heyward, M., 2002, From international to intercultural: redefining the international school for a globalized world,Journal of Research in International Education, 1(1): 9–32Google Scholar
  27. Hofstede, G., 1984, Culture's Consequences: International differences in Work Related Value,Sage: Beverley HillsGoogle Scholar
  28. HREOC (Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission), 2005, Face the Facts: Some Questions and Answers About Immigration, Refugees and Indigenous Affairs, Sydney,Australia, (December 6, 2006);
  29. Imel, S., 1998, Teaching critical reflection, Trends and Issues. Clearinghouse on Adult, Career,and Vocational Education, (June 9, 2006);
  30. Irvine, J., 1990, Black Students and School Failure: Policies, Practices and Prescriptions,Greenwood: New YorkGoogle Scholar
  31. Jurasek, R., 1995, Using ethnography to bridge the gap between study abroad and on-campus language and culture curriculum, cited in: Asian Languages Professional Learning Project (ALPLP)Google Scholar
  32. Kim, Y. Y., 2006, From ethnic to interethnic. The case for identity adaptation and transformation,Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 25(3): 283–300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Knight, J. 2004, Internationalization remodeled: definition, approaches, and rationales, Journal of Studies in International Education, 8(1): 5–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kramsch, C. 1993, Context and Culture in Language Teaching, Oxford University Press:OxfordGoogle Scholar
  35. Larapidie, C., 2001, Les Incontournables, Available from Cited in Hanna and Toohey, 2005c
  36. Lie, R., 2002, Spaces of intercultural communication, presented at the 23rd Conference IAMCR,Barcelona (21–26 July)Google Scholar
  37. Liddicoat, A.J., Papademeter, L., Scarino, A., and Kohler, M., 2003, Report on Intercultural Language Learning, Department of Education, Science and Training: Canberra, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  38. Moore, K., 2005, Internationalising the curriculum case study report, Internal Report, Queensland University of Technology: Brisbane, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  39. Moore, K., 2005, A tough place to grow up in if you are not a well-dressed, sport and beach-loving, good looking young human being' or ‘Looking at society through a bigger window’— A student-based investigation into the cultural construction of knowledge, values and prac-tices, paper presented at the Social Change in the 21st Century Conference, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia (28 October)Google Scholar
  40. Namenswirth, Z. J. and Weber, R. P., 1987, Dynamics of Culture. Allen & Unwin: BostonGoogle Scholar
  41. Ninnes, P. and Hellstén, M., eds., 2005, Internationalizing Higher Education: Critical Explorations of Pedagogy and Policy. CERC Studies in Comparative Education 16., Springer: DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  42. Nguyen, P.-M., Terlouw, C. and Pilot, A., 2006, Culturally appropriate pedagogy: the case of group learning in a Confucian Heritage Culture context, Intercultural Education, 17(1):1–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Queensland Studies Authority. Years 1 to 10 — The Arts Syllabus, 2005, (June 7, 2006),
  44. Riley, K. and Mackiewicz, J., 2003, Resolving the directness dilemma in document review sessions with nonnative speakers, IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 46(1):1–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Reid, A. and Loxton, J., 2004, Internationalisation as a way of thinking about curriculum developent and quality, in Proceedings from the Australian University Quality Forum 2004, AUQA Occasional PublicationGoogle Scholar
  46. Royce, A. P., 1977, The Anthropology of Dance, Indiana University: Bloomington/LondonGoogle Scholar
  47. Sanderson, G., 2004, Existentialism, globalisation and the cultural other, International Education Journal 4(4): 1–20Google Scholar
  48. Schön, D., 1987, Educating the reflective practitioner, paper presented at the Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Washington, DC, (June 12, 2006);̃ar/schon87.htm
  49. Scollon, R. and Scollon S. W., 2001, Intercultural Communication: A Discourse Approach,Blackwell, Malden, MAGoogle Scholar
  50. Stock, C., 1998, Moving bodies across cultures: Analysis of a Vietnamese/Australian dance and music project, paper presented at the ADSA conference, Bodies in Question, Hamilton, New Zealand, (June 7, 2006), Scholar
  51. Taylor, E. W., 1994, Intercultural competency: A transformative learning process, Adult Education Quarterly, 44(3):154–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Teekens, H., 2004, Teaching and learning in the international classroom, in H. Teekens, ed., The International Classroom: Teaching and Learning at Home and Abroad, Nuffic: AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  53. Vandermensbrugghe, J., 2004, The unbearable vagueness of critical thinking in the context of the Anglo-Saxonisation of education, International Educational Journal, 5(3): 417–422Google Scholar
  54. Wells, G., 1999, Dialogic Inquiry: Towards a Sociocultural Practice and Theory of Education,Cambridge University Press: CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  55. Welsch, W., 1999, Transkulturalität: Zwischen Globalisierung und Partikularisierung,Interkulturalität: Grundprobleme der Kulturbegegnung, edited by Studium generale der Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz. MainzGoogle Scholar
  56. Wiseman, R. L., 2003, Intercultural communication competence, in W. Gudykunst, ed Cross-Cultural and Intercultural Communication, Sage: Thousand OaksGoogle Scholar
  57. Yin, R. K., 2003, Case Study Research: Design and Methods. 3rd edition, Sage: Beverley HillsGoogle Scholar
  58. Young, Y. K., 2006, From Ethnic to Interethnic, Journal of Language and Social Psychology,25(3): 283#x2013;300CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media B.V 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • H. Gesche Astrid
    • 1
  • Makeham Paul
    • 2
  1. 1.School of Humanities and Human ServicesQueensland University of TechnologyBrisbaneAustralia
  2. 2.Creative Industries FacultyQueensland University of TechnologyBrisbaneAustralia

Personalised recommendations