Skip to main content

Kinematical Optimization of Closed-Loop Multibody Systems

  • Chapter
Multibody Dynamics

Part of the book series: Computational Methods in Applied Sciences ((COMPUTMETHODS,volume 12))

Applying optimization techniques in the field of multibody systems (MBS) has become more and more attractive considering the increasing development of computer resources. One of the main issues in the optimization of MBS concerns closed-loop systems which involve non-linear assembly constraints that must be solved before any analysis of the system. The addressed question is: how to optimize such closed-loop topologies when the objective evaluation relies on the assembly of the system?

The authors have previously proposed to artificially penalize the objective function when those assembly constraints cannot be exactly fulfilled. However, the method suffers from some limitations especially due to the difficulty to get a differentiable objective function. Therefore, the key idea of this paper is to improve the penalty approach. Practically, instead of solving the assembly constraints, their norm is minimized and the residue is taken as a penalty term instead of an artificial value. Hence, the penalized objective function becomes differentiable throughout the design space, which enables the use of efficient gradient-based optimization methods such as the sequential quadratic programming (SQP) method.

To illustrate the reliability and generality of the method, two applications are presented. They are related to the isotropy of parallel manipulators. The first optimization problem concerns a three-dof Delta robot with five design parameters and the second one deals with a more complex six-dof model of the Hunt platform involving ten design variables.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alici G, Shirinzadeh B (2004) Topology optimisation and singularity analysis of a 3-sps parallel manipulator with a passive constraining spherical joint. Mech Mach Th 39:215–235

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Angeles J (1997) Fundamentals of robotic mechanical systems: theory, methods, and algorithms. Springer, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Cabrera J, Simon A, Prado M (2002) Optimal synthesis of mechanisms with genetic algorithms. Mech Mach Th 37:1165–1177

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Ceccarelli M, Lanni C (2004) A multi-objective optimum design of general 3R manipulators for prescribed workspace limits. Mech Mach Th 39:119–132

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Collard JF, Fisette P, Duysinx P (2005) Contribution to the optimization of closed-loop multibody systems: application to parallel manipulators. Mult Syst Dyn 13:69–84

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Datoussaïd S, Verlinden O, Conti C (2002) Application of evolutionary strategies to optimal design of multibody systems. Mult Syst Dyn 8(4):393–408

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Fattah A, Hasan Ghasemi A (2002) Isotropic design of spatial parallel manipulators. Int J Robotics Res 21(9):811–824

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Gallant-Boudreau M, Boudreau R (2000) An optimal singularity-free planar parallel manipulator for a prescribed workspace using a genetic algorithm. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Integrated Design and Manufacturing in Mechanical Engineering. Presses Universitaires Polytechniques-Montreal, Montreal

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ganovski L (2007) Modeling of redundantly actuated parallel manipulators: actuator solutions and corresponding control applications. Ph.D. thesis, Uni-versité Catholique de Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium

    Google Scholar 

  10. Haj-Fraj A, Pfeiffer F (2001) Optimization of automatic gearshifting. Vehicle Syst Dyn Suppl 35:207–222

    Google Scholar 

  11. Jiménez JM, Alvarez G, Cardenal J, Cuadrado J (1997) A simple and general method for kinematic synthesis of spatial mechanisms. Mech Mach Th 32(3):323–341

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Lemay J, Notash L (2004) Configuration engine for architecture planning of modular parallel robots. Mech Mach Th 39:101–117

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Madsen K, Nielsen HB, Tingleff O (2001) Optimization with constraints. Lecture notes for the course “Optimization and data fitting”, Technical University of Denmark, Lyngby

    Google Scholar 

  14. Marín FTS, González AP (2003) Global optimization in path synthesis based on design space reduction. Mech Mach Th 38:579–594

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Németh I (1998) A cad tool for the preliminary design of 3-axis machine tools: synthesis, analysis and optimisation. Ph.D. thesis, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium

    Google Scholar 

  16. Ryu J, Cha J (2003) Volumetric error analysis and architecture optimization for accuracy of hexaslide type parallel manipulators. Mech Mach Th 38:227–240

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Sedlaczek K, Eberhard P (2006) Using augmented lagrangian particle swarm optimization for constrained problems in engineering. Struct Mult Opt 32: 277–286

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Simionescu P, Beale D (2002) Optimum synthesis of the four-bar function generator in its symmetric embodiment: the Ackermann steering linkage. Mech Mach Th 37:1487–1504

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Stocco L, Salcudean S, Sassani F (1998) Fast constrained global minimax optimization of robot parameters. Robotica 16:595–605

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Su Y, Duan B, Zheng C (2001) Genetic design of kinematically optimal fine tuning stewart platform. Mechatronics 11:821–835

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Vallejo J, Avilés R, Hernández A, Amezua E (1995) Nonlinear optimization of planar linkages for kinematic syntheses. Mech Mach Th 30(4):501–518

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Wehage RA, Haug EJ (1982) Generalized coordinate partitioning for dimension reduction in analysis of constrained dynamic systems. J Mech Design 134: 247–255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Zhou H, Cheung E (2001) Optimal synthesis of crank-rocker linkages for path generation using the orientation structural error of the fixed link. Mech Mach Th 36:973–982

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jean-François Collard .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer Science + Business Media B.V

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Collard, JF., Duysinx, P., Fisette, P. (2009). Kinematical Optimization of Closed-Loop Multibody Systems. In: Bottasso, C.L. (eds) Multibody Dynamics. Computational Methods in Applied Sciences, vol 12. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8829-2_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8829-2_9

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-8828-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-8829-2

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics