Abstract
An effective way to teach novice students problem-solving skills, is through the use of worked examples (in which students are given a written account of a model’s solution procedure to study) or modelling examples (in which a solution procedure is demonstrated to students by the model). Since eye tracking research has shown discrepancies between attention allocation of (visual) attention between individuals at different levels of expertise, there are likely to be differences between the model’s and the students’ attention allocation. Therefore, this study investigates whether the effectiveness of modelling examples can be further enhanced by guiding students’ attention on the basis of the model’s allocation of (visual) attention, that is, by showing them the model’s eye movements.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Atkinson, R. K., Derry, S. J., Renkl, A., & Wortham, D. (2000). Learning from examples: Instructional principles from the worked examples research. Review of Educational Research, 70, 181-214.
Chi, M. T. H., Bassok, M., Lewis, M. W., Reimann, P., & Glaser, R. (1989). Self-explanations: How students study and use examples in learning to solve problems. Cognitive Science, 13, 145-182.
Charness, N., Reingold, E. M., Pomplun, M., & Stampe, D. M. (2001). The perceptual aspect of skilled performance in chess: Evidence from eye movements. Memory and Cognition, 29, 1146-1152.
Grant, E. R., & Spivey, M. J. (2003). Eye movements and problem solving. Guiding attention guides thought. Psychological Science, 14, 462–466.
Haider, H., & Frensch, P. A. (1999). Eye movement during skill acquisition: More evidence for the information reduction hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 25, 172-190.
Jarodzka, H., Scheiter, K., Gerjets, P., & Van Gog, T. (2008). In the eyes of the beholder: How experts and novices classify dynamic stimuli. Manuscript submitted for publication.
Paas, F., & Van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (1993). The efficiency of instructional conditions: An approach to combine mental-effort and performance measures. Human Factors,35, 737-743.
Paas, F., & Van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (1994). Variability of worked examples and transfer of geometrical problem-solving skills: A cognitive load approach. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 122-133.
Renkl, A. (1997). Learning from worked-out examples: a study on individual differences. Cognitive Science,21, 1-29.
Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive Science, 12, 257-285.
Sweller, J., Van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & Paas, F. (1998). Cognitive architecture and instructional design. Educational Psychology Review, 10, 251-295.
Van Gog, T., & Paas, F. (2008). Instructional efficiency: Revisiting the original construct in educational research. Educational Psychologist, 43, 16-26.
Van Gog, T., Paas, F., & Van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (2005). Uncovering expertise-related differences in troubleshooting performance: Combining eye movement and concurrent verbal protocol data. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 19, 205-221.
Van Gog, T., Paas, F., & Van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (in press). Effects of studying sequences of process-oriented and product-oriented worked examples on troubleshooting transfer efficiency. Learning and Instruction.
Van Gog, T., Paas, F., Van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & Witte, P. (2005). Uncovering the problem-solving process: Cued retrospective reporting versus concurrent and retrospective reporting. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 11, 237-244.
Van Merriënboer, J. J. G., Schuurman, J. G., De Croock, M. B. M., & Paas, F. (2002). Redirecting learners’ attention during training: Effects on cognitive load, transfer test performance, and training efficiency. Learning and Instruction, 12, 11-37.
Van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & Sweller, J. (2005). Cognitive load theory and complex learning: Recent developments and future directions. Educational Psychology Review, 17, 147-177.
Velichkovsky, B. M. (1995). Communicating attention: Gaze position transfer in cooperative problem solving. Pragmatics & Cognition, 3, 199-224.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2008 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this paper
Cite this paper
van Gog, T., Jarodzka, H., Scheiter, K., Gerjets, P., Paas, F. (2008). Guiding Students’ Attention During Example Study by Showing the Model’s Eye Movements. In: Zumbach, J., Schwartz, N., Seufert, T., Kester, L. (eds) Beyond Knowledge: The Legacy of Competence. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8827-8_26
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8827-8_26
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-8826-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-8827-8
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)