Abstract
Reform documents in science education emphasize inquiry as the primary context for learning science. At the same time it is reported that teachers face many challenges in implementing inquiry-oriented approaches and little attention has been given to how to prepare future or in-service teachers in this regard. The purpose of this study was to examine teachers’ developing understanding of inquiry, as they engaged in the design of software-based inquiry learning environments. Participants consisted of ten teachers enrolled in a graduate teacher preparation science course. Data collected included questionnaires about the participants’ definition of inquiry at the beginning and at the end of the course, reflective diaries, ongoing design work using a web-based platform for learning and teaching through inquiry, and individual end-of-course interviews. The data were analyzed qualitatively. Analyses showed that at the beginning of the course, the participants held normative but simplified views of inquiry while by the end of the course the participants provided more refined characterizations of inquiry as a complex process. The examination of the participants’ design process indicated that a major challenge was how to translate theory about inquiry into an interactive curriculum, taking into account the affordances of the tool used. Even though teachers’ designs indicated that not all problems were solved, the course activities helped participants begin to bridge theory and practice.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
AAAS. (1993). Benchmarks for Science Literacy. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Anderson, R. D. (2002). Reforming science teaching: what research says about inquiry. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 13(1), 1-12.
Barab, S., & Luehmann, A. L. (2003). Building sustainable science curriculum: Acknowledging and accommodating local adaptation. Science Education, 87, 454-467.
Bers, M. U., Ponte, I., Juelich, C., Viera, A., & Schenker, J. (2002). Teachers as designers: integrating robotics in early childhood education. Information Technology in Childhood Education Annual, 2002, 123-145.
Chinn, C. A., & Malhotra, B. A. (2002). Epistemologically Authentic Inquiry in Schools: A theoretical framework for evaluating inquiry tasks. Science Education, 86, 175-218.
Committee on Science and Mathematics Teacher Preparation, N. R. C. (2000). Educating Teachers of Science, Mathematics, and Technology: New Practices for the New Millennium.
Davis, E. A., Petish, D., & Smithey, J. (2006). Challenges New Science Teachers Face. Review of Educational Research, 76(4), 607-651.
Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Chicago, IL: Aldine Publishing Company.
Krajcik, J. (2003). The value and challenges of using learning technologies to support students in learning science. Research in Science Education, 32, 411-414.
Kyza, E. A., & Constantinou, C. P. (2007). STOCHASMOS: a web-based platform for reflective, inquiry-based teaching and learning. Cyprus: Learning in Science Group.
NRC. (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
NRC. (2002). Inquiry and the National Science Education Standards: a guide for teaching and learning. Washington, DC: National Academy Press
Osborne, J., & Dillon, J. (2008). Science Education in Europe: Critical Reflections. A report to the Nuffield Foundation.
Papert, S., & Harel, I. (1991). Constructionism: Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Putnam, R., & Borko, H. (2000). What do new views of knowledge and thinking have to say about research on teacher learning? Educational Researcher, 29(1), 4-15.
Rochelle, J. M., Pea, R. D., Hoadley, C. M., Gordin, D., & Means, B. (2000). Changing How and What Children Learn in School with Computer-Based Technologies. Children and Computer Technology, 10(2), 76-101.
Schön, D. (1987). Educating the Reflective Practitioner. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Sjøberg, S., & Schreiner, C. (2006). How do learners in different cultures relate to science and technology? Results and perspectives from the project ROSE (the Relevance of Science Education). Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 6(2), 1-17.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2008 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this paper
Cite this paper
Kyza, E.A., Constantinou, C.P. (2008). A Design-Based Approach to Professional Development: The Need to See Teachers as Learners to Achieve Excellence in Inquiry-Based Science Education. In: Zumbach, J., Schwartz, N., Seufert, T., Kester, L. (eds) Beyond Knowledge: The Legacy of Competence. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8827-8_24
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8827-8_24
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-8826-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-8827-8
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)