Skip to main content

Individual-based movement behaviour in a simple marine reserve—Fishery system: why predictive models should be handled with care

  • Conference paper
Book cover Challenges to Marine Ecosystems

Part of the book series: Developments in Hydrobiology ((DIHY,volume 202))

  • 1205 Accesses

Abstract

The problem of overexploitation and unsustainability is a major issue in global fisheries. Marine reserves or protected no-take zones have been suggested as a possible solution that would maintain yield and protect stocks indefinitely. A key factor in the effectiveness of a marine reserve-fishery system is the rate of exchange of biomass between reserve and fishery: if the rate of exchange is too low then the fishery is not viable, but if the rate of exchange is too high then stocks may be exploited unsustainably and the reserve is rendered ineffective. The rate of exchange is determined by both the physical design and shape of the reserve, and the movement and dispersal behaviour of both the adult and larval-stage fish. Previous models looking at optimal reserve design usually only consider a diffusive population scale movement and dispersal, even though most animal movement is more realistically modelled as being correlated at the individual level. In this article, a deliberately simple simulation of a theoretical marine reserve-fishery system is used to demonstrate the danger of making predictions using only a population-level simplistic diffusive movement model. Further predictions based on the population average of a more realistic correlated movement model are also shown to be inaccurate. This result is due to both the high levels of individual variability in movement behaviour, and the heterogeneity of the environment. This suggests that in future studies, individual-based (rather than population-level) simulations and models are likely to give more useful insights into the dynamics of the marine fishery environment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Benhamou, S., 2004. On the expected net displacement of animals’ random movements. Ecological Modelling 171: 207–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bovet, P. & S. Benhamou, 1988. Spatial analysis of animals’ movements using a correlated random walk model. Journal of Theoretical Biology 131: 419–433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Codling, E. A., N. A. Hill, J. W. Pitchford & S. D. Simpson, 2004. Random walk models for the movement and recruitment of reef fish larvae. Marine Ecology Progress Series 279: 215–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Codling, E. A., J. W. Pitchford & S. D. Simpson, 2007. Group navigation and the ‘many wrongs principle’, in models of animal movement. Ecology 88: 1864–1870.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gerber, L. R., L. W. Botsford, A. Hastings, H. P. Possingham, S. D. Gaines, S. R. Palumbi & S. Andelman, 2003. Population models for marine reserve design: a retrospective and prospective synthesis. Ecological Applications 13: S47–S64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Girard, C., S. Benhamou & L. Dagorn, 2004. FAD: fish aggregating device or fish attracting device? A new analysis of yellowfin tuna movements around floating objects. Animal Behaviour 67: 319–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoare, D. J., I. D. Couzin, J.-G. Godin & J. Krause, 2004. Context-dependent group size choice in fish. Animal Behaviour 67: 155–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mardia, K. V. & P. E. Jupp, 1999. Directional Statistics. Wiley, Chichester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neubert, M. G., 2003. Marine reserves and optimal harvesting. Ecology Letters 6: 843–849.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Okubo, A. & S. Levin, 2001. Diffusion and Ecological Problems: Modern Perspectives. Springer, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ollason, J. G., J. M. Yearsley, K. Liu & N. Ren, 2006. Modelling the behaviour of individuals and groups of animals foraging in heterogeneous environments. In Boyd, I., S. Wanless & C. J. Camphuysen (eds), Top Predators in Marine Ecosystems. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge: 294–309.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pauly, D., V. Christensen, S. Guenette, T. J. Pitcher, U. R. Sumaila, C. J. Walters, R. Watson & D. Zeller, 2002. Towards sustainability in world fisheries. Nature 418: 689–695.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pelletier, D. & S. Mahevas, 2005, Spatially explicit fisheries simulation models for policy evaluation. Fish and Fisheries 6: 307–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pezzy, J. C. V., C. M. Roberts & B. T. Urdal, 2001. A simple bioeconomic model of a marine reserve. Ecological Economics 33: 77–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pitchford, J. W. & J. Brindley, 2001. Prey patchiness, predator survival and fish recruitment. Bulletin of Mathematical Biology 63: 527–546.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pitchford, J. W., A. James & J. Brindley, 2005. Quantifying the effects of individual and environmental variability in fish recruitment. Fisheries Oceanography 14: 156–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Righton, D., J. Metcalfe & P. Connolly, 2001. Electronic tags reveal different behaviour of North and Irish Sea cod. Nature 411: 156.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, C. M., J. A. Bohnsack, F. Gell, J. P. Hawkins & R. Goodridge, 2001. Effects of marine reserves on adjacent fisheries. Science 294: 1920–1923.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rodwell, L. D. & C. M. Roberts, 2004. Fishing and the impact of marine reserves in a variable environment. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 61: 2053–2068.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodwell, L. D., E. B. Barbier, C. M. Roberts & T. R. McClanahan, 2002. A model of tropical marine reserve-fishery linkages. Natural Resource Modeling 15: 1–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodwell, L. D., E. B. Barbier, C. M. Roberts & T. R. McClanahan, 2003. The importance of habitat quality for marine reserve-fishery linkages. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 60: 171–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sladek Nowlis, J. C. & C. M. Roberts, 1997. You can have your fish and eat it, too: theoretical approaches to marine reserve design. Proceedings of the 8th International Coral Reef Symposium 2: 1907–1910. Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute, Panama City, Panama.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sladek Nowlis, J. C. & C. M. Roberts, 1999. Fisheries benefits and optimal design of marine reserves. Fishery Bulletin 97: 604–616.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, R., J. Alder & C. Walters, 2000. A dynamic mass-balance model for marine protected areas. Fish and Fisheries 1: 94–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Edward A. Codling .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this paper

Cite this paper

Codling, E.A. (2008). Individual-based movement behaviour in a simple marine reserve—Fishery system: why predictive models should be handled with care. In: Davenport, J., et al. Challenges to Marine Ecosystems. Developments in Hydrobiology, vol 202. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8808-7_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics