Besides the work of Husserl, also that especially of H.-N. Castañeda and Sydney Shoemaker inform this transcendental phenomenological study of “I.” The primacy of first-person experience and reference along with the impossibility of substituting other third-person or second-person forms for the first-person are argued for. There is an adumbration of the transcendental I in the I’s functioning as the responsible agent of manifestation (Robert Sokolowski). There is highlighted the non-ascriptive reference of self-awareness and the first-person indexical reference to oneself as oneself. The basic self-awareness is non-reflective and always pervaded by an at least anonymous I-ness. We address opponents such as Humeans, Buddhists and even Castañeda. Inseparable from this discussion is the analysis of what a “perspective” is, what “first-person perspective” means, and the relation of reflection to first-person perspective.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
(2009). The First Person and the Transcendental I. In: Hart, J.G. (eds) Who One Is. Phaenomenologica, vol 189. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8798-1_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8798-1_2
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-8797-4
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-8798-1
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawPhilosophy and Religion (R0)