Integration of breeding and technology into diversification strategies for disease control in modern agriculture

  • Maria R. Finckh


While diversity for resistance has been recognised for more than 60 years as a key factor in disease management, and diversification strategies such as cultivar mixtures and multilines are described and advocated in almost every plant pathology textbook, the general view in modern agriculture is that diversity would be too difficult and expensive to implement. In addition, difficulties in marketing the produce are emphasised. The question thus arises if and how such strategies can be designed to find a place in modern agriculture. Considering the general ecological benefits of diversification and the possible economical benefits for growers and society, several possible approaches to the solution of actual and perceived problems in modern agriculture are discussed. An important route towards achieving diversity would be to integrate it into the breeding process. Selection criteria would include inducibility of resistance and competitive ability, in order to produce diversified varieties able to adapt both to unpredictable environmental conditions (especially climatic) and to changing pest and pathogen populations through co-evolution. Evolutionary breeding methods such as composite crosses and modern landraces and some of the legal problems associated with these approaches are discussed. Technical solutions are integral to the future use of diversification strategies and range from more or less simple adjustments to machinery for planting and harvesting to devices designed for separation of the harvested products.


Mixtures Intercropping Composite crosses Evolutionary breeding Co-evolution Plant varietal protection 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Allard, R. W. (1961). Relationship between genetic diversity and consistency of performance in different environments. Crop Science, 1, 127–133.Google Scholar
  2. Allard, R. W. (1988). Genetic changes associated with the evolution of adaptedness in cultivated plants and their wild progenitors. Journal of Heredity, 79, 225–238.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Altieri, M. A. (1995). Agroecology. The science of sustainable agriculture. Boulder, Colorado, London: Westview Press, IT Publications.Google Scholar
  4. Altieri, M A., Nicholls, C. I., & Wolfe, M. S. (1996). Biodiversity-a central concept in organic agriculture: Restraining pests and diseases. In T. V. Ostergaard (Ed.), Fundamentals of Organic Agriculture, vol. 1 (pp. 91–112). IFOAM, Ökozentrum Imsbach, D-66636 Tholey-Theley.Google Scholar
  5. Andrivon, D., Lucas, J. M. A., & Ellisseche, D. (2003). Development of natural late blight epidemics in pure and mixed plots of potato cultivars with different levels of partial resistance. Plant Pathology, 52, 586–594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Baumer, M. (1983). Neue Ergebnisse mit Sortenmischungen bei Sommergerste. Top Agrar, 2, 82–86.Google Scholar
  7. Bouws, H., & Finckh, M. R. (2008). Effects of strip-intercropping of potatoes with non-hosts on late blight severity and tuber yield in organic production. Plant Pathology, in press.Google Scholar
  8. Calonnec, A., Goyeau, H., & Devallavieillepope, C. (1996). Effects of induced resistance on infection efficiency and sporulation of Puccinia striiformis on seedlings in varietal mixtures and on field epidemics in pure stands. European Journal of Plant Pathology, 102, 733–741.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ceccarelli, S., Grando, R., Tutwiler, R., Baha, J., Martini, A. M., Salahieh, H., et al. (2000). A methodological study on participatory plant breeding. I. Selection phase. Euphytica, 111, 91–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chin, K. M., Wolfe, M. S., & Minchin, P. N. (1984). Host-mediated interactions between pathogen genotypes. Plant Pathology, 33, 161–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Daellenbach, G. C., Kerridge, P. C., Wolfe, M. S., Frossard, E., & Finckh, M. R. (2005). Plant productivity in cassava-based mixed cropping systems in Colombian hillside farms. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 105, 595–614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Danquah, E. Y., & Barrett, J. A. (2002a). Grain yield in composite cross five of barley: Effects of natural selection. Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 138, 171–176.Google Scholar
  13. Danquah, E. Y., & Barrett, J. A. (2002b). Evidence of natural selection for disease resistance in Composite Cross Five (CCV) of barley. Genetica, 115, 195–203.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dawson, J., Murphy, K., Piaskowski, J., Arteburn, M., Lyon, S., Balow, K., et al. (2006). Increasing the diversity of wheat cultivars in Washington State (US). In H. Ostergaard, & L. Fontaine (Eds.) Proceedings of the COST SUSVAR workshop on cereal crop diversity: implications for production and products, 13–14 June 2006, La Besse, France (pp. 63–67). Paris, France: ITAB (Institut Technique de l'Agriculture Biologique).Google Scholar
  15. Döring, T. F., Brandt, M., Heß, J., Finckh, M. R., & Saucke, H. (2005). Effects of straw muluch on soil nitrate dynamics, weeds, yield and soil erosion in organically grown potatoes. Field Crops Research, 94, 238–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Elmer, W. H., & LaMondia, J. L. (1999). Influence of ammonium sulfate and rotation crops on strawberry black root rot. Plant Disease, 83, 119–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Finckh, M. R. (2003). Ecological benefits of Diversification. In T. W. Mew, et al. (Ed.) Rice science: innovations and impact for livelihood (pp. 549–564). Los Banos, Philippines: Internatonal Rice Research Institute.Google Scholar
  18. Finckh, M. R., Bouws-Beuermann, H., Piepho, H.-P., & Büchse, A. (2005). Effects of field geometry, neighbour culture and exposition on the spatial and temporal spread of Phytophthora infestans in organic farming. 16th Triennial Conference of the European Association of Potato Research, 17–22.7.2005, Bilbao. Abstracts of Papers and Posters II, pp. 429–431.Google Scholar
  19. Finckh, M. R., Gacek, E. S., Goyeau, H., Lannou, C., Merz, U., Mundt, C. C., et al. (2000). Cereal variety and species mixtures in practice, with emphasis on disease resistance. Agronomie, 20, 813–837.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Finckh, M. R., & Mundt, C. C. (1996). Temporal dynamics of plant competition in genetically diverse wheat populations in the presence and absence of stripe rust. Journal of Applied Ecology, 33, 1041–1052.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Finckh, M. R. & Wolfe, M. S. (2006). Diversification strategies. In B. M. Cooke et al. (Eds.), The Epidemiology of Plant Disease. (pp. 269–308). Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  22. Fowler, C., & Mooney, P. R. (1990). Shattering: Food politics, and the loss of genetic diversity. Tucson, AR: University of Arizona Press.Google Scholar
  23. Francis, C. A. (1990). Breeding hybrids and varieties for sustainable systems. In C. A. Francis, et al. (Ed.) Sustainable agriculture in temperate zones (pp. 24–54). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  24. Gacek, E. S., Czembor, H. J., & Nadziak, J. (1996). Disease restriction, grain yield and its stability in winter barley cultivar mixtures. In Proceedings of the Third Workshop on Integrated Control of Cereal Mildews Across Europe. Kappel a. Albis, Switzerland, 5–9 Nov. 1994 (pp. 185–190). Brussels, Belgium: Office for Official Publications of the EC.Google Scholar
  25. Garrett, K. A., & Mundt, C. C. (2000). Host diversity can reduce potato late blight severity for focal and general patterns of primary inoculum. Phytopathology, 90, 1307–1312.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Garrett, K. A., Nelson, R. J., Mundt, C. C., Chacon, G., Jaramillo, R. E., & Forbes, G. A. (2001). The effects of host diversity and other management components on epidemics of potato late blight in the humid highland tropics. Phytopathology, 91, 993–1000.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Ghaouti, L. & Link, W. (2007). Appropriate breeding approach and type of cultivar in breeding faba bean for organic farming. In Plant breeding for organic and sustainable low-input agriculture: dealing with genotype-environment interactions. Book of Abstracts. EUCARPIA Symposium, 7–9 November 2007, Wageningen, NL (p. 55) Wageningen, NL: Wageningen University, Plant Breeding Group.Google Scholar
  28. Ghaouti, L., Vogt-Kaute, W., & Link, W. (2005). Entwicklung ökologischer Regionalsorten bei Ackerbohnen [Development of region-specific organic cultivars in faba bean]. In 8. Wissenschaftstagung Ökologischer Landbau–Ende der Nische, Kassel 01.0.–04.3.2005. (pp. 61–62).Google Scholar
  29. Gimsing, A. L., & Kirkegaard, J. A. (2006). Glucosinolate and isothiocyanate concentration in soil following incorporation of Brassica biofumigants. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 38, 2255–2264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Goldringer, I., Prouin, C., Rousset, M., Galic, N., & Bonnin, I. (2006). Rapid differentiation of experimental populations of wheat for heading-time in response to local climatic conditions. Annals of Botany, 98, 805–817.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hamblin, J., & Donald, C. M. (1974). The relationship between plant form, competitive ability and grain yield in a barley cross. Euphytica, 23, 535–542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Harlan, J. R. (1972). Genetics of disaster. Journal of Environmental Quality, 1, 212–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Harlan, H. V., & Martini, M. L. (1929). A composite hybrid mixture. Journal of the American Society Agronomy, 21, 487–490.Google Scholar
  34. Hensleigh, P. F., Blake, T. K., & Welty, L. E. (1992). Natural selection on winter barley composite cross XXVI affects winter survival and associated traits. Crop Science, 32, 57–62.Google Scholar
  35. Jain, S. K., & Qualset, C. O. (1975). New developments in the evaluation and theory of bulk populations. In Third International Barley Genetics Symposium (pp. 739–749). München: Karl Thiemig.Google Scholar
  36. Jarvis, D. I., Brown, A. H. D., Imbruce, V., Ochoa, J., Sadiki, M., Karamura, E., et al. (2007). Managing crop disease in traditional agroecosystems:the benefits and hazards of genetic diversity. In D. I. Jarvis, et al. (Ed.) Managing biodiversity in agricultural ecosystems (pp. 292–319). New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Juska, A., Busch, L., & Tanaka, K. (1997). The blackleg epidemic in Canadian rapeseed as a “normal agricultural accident”. Ecological Applications, 7, 1350–1356.Google Scholar
  38. Kasuya, M., Olivier, A. R., Ota, Y., Tojo, M., Honjo, H., & Fukui, R. (2006). Induction of soil suppressiveness against Rhizoctonia solani by incorporation of dried plant residues into soil. Phytopathology, 96, 1372–1379.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Kloppenburg, J. R. (2004). First the seed. The political economy of plant biotechnology. Madison, WI: The University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
  40. Knott, E. A., & Mundt, C. C. (1990). Mixing ability analysis of wheat cultivar mixtures under diseased and non-diseased conditions. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 80, 313–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Lannou, C., Hubert, P., & Gimeno, C. (2005). Competition and interactions among stripe rust pathotypes in wheat-cultivar mixtures. Plant Pathology, 54, 699–712.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Lopez, C. G., & Mundt, C. C. (2000). Using mixing ability analysis from two-way cultivar mixtures to predict the performance of cultivars in complex mixtures. Field Crops Research, 68, 121–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Mayton, H. S., Oliviar, C., Vaughn, S. F., & Loria, R. (1996). Correlation of fungicidal activity of Brassica species with allyl isothiocyanate production in macerated leaf tissue. Phytopathology, 86, 267–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Mille, B., Belhaj Fraj, M., Monod, H., & de Vallavieille-Pope, C. (2006). Assessing four-way mixtures of winter bread wheat for disease resistance, yield, and grain quality using the performance of their two-way and individual cultivar components. European Journal of Plant Pathology, 114, 163–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Mooney, P. R. (1979). Seeds of the Earth. A public or private resource. Published by Inter Pares (Ottawa) for the Canadian Council for Intern. Co-operation and the Intern. Coalition for Development Action (London). Ottawa: Ottawa Mutual Press Limited.Google Scholar
  46. Moreno-Ruiz, G., & Castillo-Zapata, J. (1990). The variety Colombia: A variety of coffee with resistance to rust (Hemileia vastatrix Berk. & Br.). Cenicafe Chinchiná-Caldas-Colombia Technical Bulletin, 9, 1–27.Google Scholar
  47. Mundt, C. C. (2002). Use of multiline cultivars and cultivar mixtures for disease management. Annual Review of Phytopathology, 40, 381–410.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Mundt, C. C., & Brophy, L. S. (1988). Influence of host genotype units on the effectiveness of host mixtures for disease control: A modeling approach. Phytopathology, 78, 1087–1094.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Murphy, K., Lammer, D., Lyon, S., Brady, C., & Jones, S. S. (2004). Breeding for organic and low-input farming systems: An evolutionary-participatory breeding method for inbred cereal grains. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems, 20, 48–55.Google Scholar
  50. Odoerfer, A., Obst, A., & Pommer, G. (1994). The effects of different leaf crops in a long lasting monoculture with winter wheat. 2. Disease development and effects of phytosanitary measures. Agribiology Research, 47, 56–66.Google Scholar
  51. Phillips, S. L., Shaw, M. W., & Wolfe, M. S. (2005). The effect of potato variety mixtures on epidemics of late blight in relation to plot size and level of resistance. Annals of Applied Biology, 147, 247–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Phillips, S. L., & Wolfe, M. S. (2005). Evolutionary plant breeding for low input systems. Journal of Agricultural Science, 143, 245–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Picard, C., Baruffa, E., & Bosco, M. (2008). Enrichment and diversity of plant-probiotic microorganisms in the rhizosphere of hybrid maize during four growth cycles. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 40, 106–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Picard, C. & Bosco, M. (2007). Genotypic and phenotypic diversity in populations of plant-probiotic Pseudomonas spp. colonizing roots. Naturwissenschaften, 95, 1–16.Google Scholar
  55. Pilet, F., Chacon, G., Forbes, G. A., & Andrivon, D. (2006). Protection of susceptible potato cultivars against late blight in mixtures increases with decreasing disease pressure. Phytopathology, 96, 777–783.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Qualset, C. O. (1968). Population structure and performance in wheat. In K. W. Finlay, & K. W. Shepherd (Eds.) Proceedings of the third international wheat genetics symposium (pp. 397–402). Canberra: Butterworth.Google Scholar
  57. Saucke, H., & Döring, T. F. (2004). Potato virus Y reduction by straw mulch in organic potatoes. Annals of Applied Biology, 144, 347–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Schmidt, R. A. (1978). Diseases in forest ecosystems: The importance of functional diversity. In J. G. Horsfall, & E. B. Cowling (Eds.) Plant disease: An advanced treatise, vol 2 (pp. 287–315). New York: Academic.Google Scholar
  59. Skelsey, P., Rossing, W. A. H., Kessel, G. J. T., Powell, J., & van der Werf, W. (2005). Influence of host diversity on development of epidemics: An evaluation and elaboration of mixture theory. Phytopathology, 95, 328–338.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Sperling, L., Loevinsohn, M. E., & Ntabomvura, B. (1993). Rethinking the farmer's role in plant breeding: Local bean experts and on-station selection in Rwanda. Experimental Agriculture, 29, 509–519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Stakman, E. C. (1947). Plant diseases are shifting enemies. American Scientist, 35, 321–350.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Stevens, N. E. (1942). How plant breeding programs complicate plant disease problems. Science, 95, 313–316.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Stolz, H., Bruns, C., & Finckh, M. R. (2003). Einfluß genetischer Vielfalt auf den Befall mit Phytophthora infestans und auf die Ertragsbildung in Kartoffelbeständen. In Beiträge zur 7. Wissenschaftstagung zum Ökologischen Landbau. Ökologischer Landbau der Zukunft,, Wien (pp. 569–570). Vienna: Universität für Bodenkultur.Google Scholar
  64. Suneson, C. A. (1956). An evolutionary plant breeding method. Agronomy Journal, 48, 188–191.Google Scholar
  65. Thinlay. (1998). Rice blast, caused by Magnaporthe grisea. In Bhutan and development of strategies for resistance breeding and management. Zürich, Switzerland: Dissertation ETH No. 12777, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
  66. Thinlay, Zeigler, R. S., & Finckh, M. R. (2000). Pathogenic variability of Pyricularia grisea from the high- and mid-elevation zones of Bhutan. Phytopathology, 90, 621–628.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Tilman, D., Reich, P. B., Knops, J., Wedin, D., Mielke, T., & Lehman, C. L. (2001). Diversity and productivity in a long-term grassland experiment. Science, 294, 843–845.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Trenbath, B. R. (1977). Interactions among diverse hosts and diverse parasites. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 287, 124–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Trutmann, P., & Pyndji, M. M. (1994). Partial replacement of local common bean mixtures by high yielding angular leaf spot resistant varieties to conserve local genetic diversity while increasing yield. Annals of Applied Biology, 125, 45–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Trutmann, P., Voss, J., & Fairhead, J. (1993). Management of common bean diseases by farmers in the Central African Highlands. International Journal of Pest Management, 39, 334–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Ullstrup, A. J. (1972). The impacts of the Southern com leaf blight epidemics of 1970–1971. Annual Review of Phytopathology, 10, 37–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. van Leur, J. A. G., Ceccarelli, S., & Grando, S. (1989). Diversity for disease resistance in barley landraces from Syria and Jordan. Plant Breeding, 103, 324–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Vilich, V. (1993). Crop rotation with pure stands and mixtures of barley and wheat to control stem and root rot diseases. Crop Protection, 12, 373–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Webster, R. K., Saghai-Maroof, M. A., & Allard, R. W. (1986). Evolutionary response of Barley Composite Cross II to Rhynchosporium secalis analyzed by pathogenic complexity and by gene-by-race relationships. Phytopathology, 76, 661–668.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Wolfe, M. S. (1992). Barley diseases: Maintaining the value of our varieties. In L. Munk (Ed.) Barley genetics VI (pp. 1055–1067). Copenhagen: Munksgaard.Google Scholar
  76. Wolfe, M. S., & Finckh, M. R. (1997). Diversity of host resistance within the crop: effects on host, pathogen and disease. In H. Hartleb, et al. (Ed.) Plant resistance to fungal diseases (pp. 378–400). Jena: G. Fischer Verlag.Google Scholar
  77. Wolfe, M. S., Hinchscliffe, K. E., Clarke, S. M., Jones, H., Haigh, Z., Snape, J., et al. (2006). Evolutionary breeding of wheat. In H. Ostergaard, & L. Fontaine (Eds.) Proceedings of the COST SUSVAR workshop on cereal crop diversity: Implications for production and products, 13–14 June 2006, La Besse, France (pp. 77–80). Paris, France: ITAB (Institut Technique de l'Agriculture Biologique).Google Scholar
  78. Yadav, O. P., Weltzien, R. E., Bidinger, F. R., & Mahalakshmi, V. (2000). Heterosis in landrace- based topcross hybrids of pearl millet across arid environments. Euphytica, 112, 295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Zhou, X. G., & Everts, K. L. (2004). Suppression of Fusarium wilt of watermelon by soil amendment with hairy vetch. Plant Disease, 88, 1357–1365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Zhu, Y., Fang, H., Wang, Y., Fan, J. X., Yang, S., Mew, T. W., & Mundt, C. C. (2005). Panicle blast and canopy moisture in rice cultivar mixtures. Phytopathology, 95, 433–438.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© KNPV 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Organic Agricultural Sciences, Ecological Plant Protection GroupUniversity of KasselWitzenhausenGermany

Personalised recommendations