The Use of Mycorrhizal Biotechnology in Restoration of Disturbed Ecosystem

  • Ali M. Quoreshi

Abstract

Mycorrhizal fungi play a crucial role in plant nutrient uptake, water relations, ecosystem establishment, plant diversity, and productivity of plants. Mycorrhizas also protect plants against root pathogens and toxic stresses. The fundamental importance of the mycorrhizal association in restoration and to improve revegetation of disturbed mined lands is well recognized. However, the use of mycorrhizal biotechnology in land reclamation and revegetation of disturbed mine sites is not well practiced in many parts of the world. The destruction of mycorrhizal fungal network in soil system is the vital event of soil disturbance, and its reinstallation is an essential approach of habitat restoration. Successful revegetation of severely disturbed mine lands can be achieved by using “biological tools” mycorrhizal fungi inoculated tree seedlings, shrubs, and grasses. This chapter discusses the different types of mycorrhizas, which play an essential function in altering disturbed lands into productive lands, the mechanisms by which disturbed ecosystem benefits through symbiotic associations and their interactions in the rhizosphere. The importance of reinstallation of mycorrhizal systems in the rhizosphere is emphasized and their impact in landscape regeneration and in bioremediation of contaminated soils are discussed.

Keywords

Land reclamation and revegetation disturbed mined lands mycorrhizal inoculation symbiotic association 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Al-Karaki, G.N., Hammad, R., and Rusan, M., 2001, Response of two tomato cultivars differing in salt tolerance to inoculation with mycorrhizal fungi under salt stress. Mycorrhiza 11: 43-47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Allen, M.F., Allen, E.B., and Gómez-Pompa, A., 2005, Effects of mycorrhizae and non-target organisms on restoration of a seasonal tropical forest in Quintano Roo, Mexico: factors limiting tree establishment. Restor. Ecol. 13: 325-533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Amaranthus, M.P., and Perry, D.A., 1987, Effect of soil transfer on ectomycorrhizal formation and the survival and growth of conifer seedlings on old, reforested clear-cuts. Can. J. For. Res. 17: 944-950.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Azcón-Aguilar, C., and Barea, J.M., 1996, Arbuscular mycorrhizas and biological control of soil-borne plant pathogens: an overview of the mechanisms involved. Mycorrhiza 6: 457-464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bécard, G., and Piché, Y., 1992, Establishment of vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhiza in root organ culture: review and proposed methodology. In: Techniques for the study of mycorrhiza, J., Norris, D., Read, and A., Verma eds., Academic, New York, pp. 89-108.Google Scholar
  6. Bois, G., Bertrand, A., Piché, Y., Fung, M., and Khasa, D.P., 2006, Growth, compatible solute and salt accumulation of five mycorrhizal fungal species grown over a range of NaCl concentrations. Mycorrhiza 16: 99-109.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Bois, G.Y., Piché, Fung, M.Y.P., and Khasa, D.P., 2005, Mycorrhizal inoculum potentials of pure reclamation materials and revegetated tailing sands from the Canadian oil sand industry. Mycorrhiza 15: 149-158.Google Scholar
  8. Bradley, R., Burt, A.J., and Read, D.J., 1982, The biology of mycorrhiza in the Ericaceae VIII. The role of mycorrhizal infection in heavy metal resistance. New Phytol. 91: 197-209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Browning, M.H.R., and Whitney, R.D., 1992, Field performance of black spruce and jack pine inoculated with selected species of ectomycorrhizal fungi. Can. J. For. Res. 22: 1974-1982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Browning, M.H.R., and Whitney, R.D., 1993, Infection of containerized jack pine and black spruce by Laccaria species and Thelephora terristris and seedling survival and growth after outplanting. Can. J. For. Res. 23: 330-333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Brundrett, M., Bougher, N., Dell, B., Grove, T., and Malajczuk, N., 1996, Working with mycorrhizas in forestry and agriculture. ACIAR, Canbera Australia.Google Scholar
  12. Brunner, I.L., Brunner, F., and Miller, O.K., 1990, Ectomycorrhizal synthesis with Alaskan Alnus tenuifolia. Can. J. Bot. 68: 761-767.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Budi, S., Caussanel, J., Trouvelot, A., and Gianinazzi, S., 1998, The biotechnology of mycor-rhizas. In: Microbial interactions in agriculture and forestry, N.S. Subba Rao, and Y.R. Dommergues eds., Science Publishers, New Delhi, India, pp. 149-162.Google Scholar
  14. Cairney, J.W.G., and Meharg, A.A., 2003, Ericoid mycorrhiza: a partnership that exploits harsh edaphic conditions. Europ. J. Sol. Sci. 54: 735-740.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Caravaca, F., Barea, J.M., Palenzuela, J., Figuerosa, D., alguacil, M.M., and Roldán, A., 2003, Establishment of shrub species in a degraded semiarid site after inoculation with native or allochthonous arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Appl. Soil Ecol. 22: 103-111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Chan, F.J., and R.M. Wong, 1989, Reestablishment of native riparian species at an altered high elevation site. In: Proceedings of California Riparian Systems Conference, Protection, management, and restoration for the 1990’s, pp. 428-435.Google Scholar
  17. Colpaert, J.V., and Van Assche, J.A., 1992, The effects of cadmium and cadmium-zinc inter-actions on the axenic growth of ectomycorrhizal fungi. Plant Soil 145: 237-243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Colpaert, J.V., and Van Assche, J.A., 1993, The effects of cadmium on mycorrhizal Pinus sylvestris L. New Phytol. 123: 325-333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Cooke, J.C., and Lefor, M.W., 1990, Comparison of veiscular-arbuscular mycorrhizae in plants from disturbed and adjacent undisturbed regions of a costal salt marsh in Clinto, Connecticut, USA. Environ. Manage. 14: 212-137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Cordell, C.E., Marx, D.H., and Caldweii, C., 1991, Operational application of specific ecto-mycorrhizal fungi in mineland reclamation. In: Proceedings of National Meeting of American Society on Surface Mining and Reclamation, Durango, Colorado, May 14-17.Google Scholar
  21. Coughlan, A.P., and Piché, Y., 2005, Cistus incanus root organ cultures: a valuable tool for studying mycorrhizal associations. In: In vitro culture of mycorrhizas, S., Declerck, D.-G., Strullu, and A., Fortin eds., Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, Soil Biol. 4: pp. 235-252.Google Scholar
  22. Dalpé, Y., and Monreal, M., 2004, Arbuscular mycorrhiza inoculum to support sustainable cropping systems. Online. Crop Manage. doi:10.1094/CM-2004-0301-09-RV.Google Scholar
  23. Danielson, R.M., and Visser, S., 1989, Host response to inoculation and behaviour of induced and indigenous ectomycorrhizal fungi of jack pine grown on oil-sands tailings. Can. J. For. Res. 19: 1412-1421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Donnelly, P.K., and Fletcher, J.S., 1994, Potential use of mycorrhizal fungi as bioremediation agents. In: Bioremediation through rhizosphere technology, T.A., Anderson, and J.R., Coats eds., ACS Symposium Series, American Chemical Society, Washington, DC, Vol. 563, pp. 93-99.Google Scholar
  25. Dunabeitia, M., Rodriguez, N., Salcedo, I., and Sarrionandia, E., 2004, Field mycorrhization and its influence on the establishment and development of the seedlings in a broadleaf plantation in the Basque country. For. Ecol. Manage. 195: 129-139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Enkhtuya, B., Rydolvá, J., and Vosátka, M., 2000, Effectiveness of indigenous and non-indegenous isolates of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in soils from degraded ecosystems and man-made habitats. Appl. Soil Ecol. 14: 201-211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Fortin, J.A., Bécard, G., Declerck, S., Dalpé, Y., St-Arnaud, M., Coughlan, A.P., and Piché, Y., 2002, Arbuscular mycorrhiza on root-organ cultures. Can. J. Bot. 80: 1-20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Fung, M.Y.P., and Macyk, T.M., 2000, Reclamation of oil sand mining areas. In: Reclama-tion of drastically disturbed lands, R.I., Barnhisel, R.G., Darmody, and W.L., Daniels eds., American Society of Agronomy monographs, 2nd edition 41, pp. 755-744.Google Scholar
  29. Gadd, G.M., 1993, Interactions of fungi with toxic metals. New Phytol. 124: 25-60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Gagné, A., Jany, J-L., Bousquet, J., and Khasa, D.P., 2006, Ectomycorrhizal fungal com-munities of nursery-inoculated seedlings outplanted on clear-cut sites in northern Alberta. Can. J. For. Res. 36: 1684-1694.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Galli, U., Schuepp, H. and Brunold, C., 1994, Heavy metal binding by mycorrhizal fungi. Physiol. Plant. 92: 364-368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Gaur, A., and Adholeya, A., 2004, Prospect of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in phytore-mediation of heave metal contaminated soils. Curr. Sci. 86: 528-534.Google Scholar
  33. Gibson, B.R., and Mitchell, D.T., 2006, Sensitivity of ericoid mycorrhizal fungi and mycorrhizal Calluna vulgaris to copper mine spoil from Avoca County, Wicklow. Biol. Environ. Proc. Royal Irish Acad. 106B: 9-18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Göhre, V., and Paszkowski, U., 2006, Contribution of the arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis to heavy metal phytoremediation. Planta 223: 1115-1122.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Gould, A.B., Hendrix, J.W., and Richard, S.F., 1996, Relationship of mycorrhizal activity to time following reclamation of surface mine land in western Kentucky. 1. Propagule and spore population densities. Can. J. Bot. 74: 247-261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Gramss, G., Kirsche, B., Voigt, B., Günther, T., and Fritsche, W., 1999, Conversion rates of five polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in liquid cultures of fifty-eight fungi and the concomitant production of oxidative enzymes. Mycol. Res. 8: 1009-1018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Hibbs, D.E., and Cromack, K., 1990, Actinorhizal plants in Pacific northwest forests. In: The biology of Frankia and actinorhizal plants, C.R. Schwintzer, and J.D. Tjepkema eds, Academic, London, pp. 343-364.Google Scholar
  38. Jany, J.L., Bousquet, J., and Khasa, D.P., 2003, Microsatellite markers for Hebeloma species developed from expressed sequence tags in the ectomycorrhizal fungus Hebeloma cylindrosporum. Mole. Ecol. 3: 659-661.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Jany, J.L., Bousquet, J., Gagné, A., and Khasa, D.P, 2006, Simple sequence repeat (SSR) markers in the ectomycorrhizal fungus Laccaria bicolor for environmental monitoring of introduced strains and molecular ecology applications. Mycol. Res. 110: 51-59.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Jones, M.D., and Hutchinson, T.C., 1986, The effect of mycorrhizal infection on the response of Betula papyrifera to nickel and copper. New Phytol. 102: 429-442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Jones, M.D., and Hutchinson, T.C., 1988, Nickel toxicity in mycorrhizal birch seedlings infected with Lactarius rufus or Scleroderma flavidum. I. Effects on growth, photo-systhesis, respiration and transpiration. New Phytol. 108: 451-459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Kernaghan, G., Hambling, B., Fung, M., and Khasa, D.P., 2002, In vitro selection of Boreal ectomycorrhizal fungi for use in reclamation of saline-alkaline habitats. Restor. Ecol. 10: 1-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Kernaghan, G., Sigler, L., and Khasa, D.P., 2003, Mycorrhizal and root endophytic fungi of containerized Picea glauca seedling assessed by rDNA sequence analysis. Microb. Ecol. 45: 128-136.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Khan, A.G., 2006, Mycorrhizoremediation- an enhanced form of phytoremidiation. J Zhejiang. Univ. Science B 7: 503-514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Khasa, D.P., Chakarvarty, P., Robertson, B., Thomas, R., and Danick, B.P., 2002, The mycor-rhizal status of selected poplar clones introduced in Alberta. Biomass Bioener. 22: 99-104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Klironomos, J.N., 2003, Variation in plant response to native and exotic arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Ecology 84: 2292-2301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Koomen, I., McGrath, S.P., and Giller, K.E., 1990, Mycorrhizal infection of clover is delayed in soils contaminated with heavy metals from past sewage sludge applications. Soil Biol. Biochem. 22: 871-873.Google Scholar
  48. Kretzer, A.M., Molina, R., and Spatafora, J.W., 2000, Microsatellite markers for the ectomycorrhizal basiodiomycetes Rhizopogon vinicolor. Mole. Ecol. 9: 1190-1191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Kretzer, A.M., Dunham, S., Molina, R., and Spatafora, J.W., 2003, Microsatellite markers reveal the below ground distribution of genets in two species of Rhizopogon forming tuberculate ectomycorrhizas on Douglas fir. New Phytol. 161: 313-320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Kropp, B.R., and Langlois, C.G., 1990, Ectomycorrhizae in reforestation. Can. J. For. Res. 20: 438-451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Lacourt, I., D’Angelo, S., Girlanda, M., Turnau, K., Bonfante, P, and Perotto, S., 2000, Genetic polymorphism and metal sensitivity of Oidiodendron maius strains isolated from polluted soil. Annl. Microbiol. 50: 157-166.Google Scholar
  52. Lain, C., Hogetsu, T., Matsushita, N., Guerin-Laguette, A., Suzuki, K., and Yamada, A., 2003, Development of microsatellite markers from an ectomycorrhizal fungus, Tricholoma matsutake, by an ISSR-suppression-PCR method. Mycorrhiza 13: 27-31.Google Scholar
  53. Le Tacon, F., Jung, G., Mugnier, J., Michelot, P., and Mauperin, C., 1985, Efficiency in a forest nursery of an ectomycorrhizal fungus inoculum produced in a fermentor and entrapped in polymeric gels. Can. J. Bot. 63: 1664-1668.Google Scholar
  54. Le Tacon, F., Alvarez, I.F., Bouchard, D., Henrion, B., Jackson, M.R., Luff, S., Parledé, I.J., Pera, J., Stenström, E., Volleneuve, N., and Walker, C., 1994, Variations in field response of forest trees to nursery ectomycorrhizal inoculation in Europe. In: Mycorrhizas in eco-systems, D.J. Read et al. eds., CAB, Wallingford, pp. 119-134.Google Scholar
  55. Leake, J.R., Shaw, G., and Read, D.J., 1990, The biology of mycorrhiza in the Ericaceae XVI. Mycorrhiza and iron uptake in Calluna vulgaris (L.) Hull in the presence of two calcium salts. New Phytol. 114: 651-657.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Malajczuk, N., Redell, P., and Brundrett, M., 1994, The role of ectomycorrhizal fungi in minesite reclamation. In: Mycorrhizae and plant health, F.L. Pfleger and R.G. Linderman eds., The American Phytopathological Society, St Paul, MN.Google Scholar
  57. Marx, D.H., 1991, The practical significance of ectomycorrhizae in forest establishment. In: Ecophysiology of ectomycorrhizae of forest trees, The Marcus Wallenberg Foundation ed., Stockholm, Sweden, Symposium Proceedings, 7, pp. 54-90.Google Scholar
  58. Marx, D.H., and Kenney, D.S., 1982, Production of ectomycorrhizal inoculum. In: Methods and principles of mycorrhizal research, N.C. Schenck ed., The American Phyto-pathological Society, St Paul, MN, pp. 131-146.Google Scholar
  59. Marx, D.H., Cordell, C.E., and Clark, IIIA, , 1988, Eight-year performance of loblolly pine with Pisolithus ectomycorrhizae on a good quality forest site. South. J. Am. For. 12: 275-280.Google Scholar
  60. Marx, D.H., Ruehle, J.L., and Cordell, C.E., 1991, Methods for studying nursery and field response of trees to specific ectomycorrhiza. In: Techniques for mycorrhizal research, J.R. Norris, D. Read, and A.K. Varma eds., Academic, California, pp. 384-411.Google Scholar
  61. Mauperin, C., Mortier, F., Garbaye, J., LeTacon, F., and Carr, G., 1987, Viability of an ecto-mycorrhizal inoculum produced in liquid medium and entrapped in a calcium alginate get. Can. J. Bot. 65: 2326-2329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Meharg, A.A., and Cairney, J.W.G., 2000, Ectomycorrhizas- extending the capabilities of rhizosphere remediation? Soil Biol. Biochem. 32: 1475-1484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Miller, R.M., and Jastrow, J.D., 1992, The application of VA mycorrhizae to ecosystem restoration and reclamation. In: Mycorrhizal functioning, M., Allen ed., Chapman & Hall, New York.Google Scholar
  64. Mitchell, D.T., and Gibson, B.R., 2006, Ericoid mycorrhizal association: ability to adapt to a broad range of habitats. Mycologist 20: 2-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Molina, R., and Trappe, J.M., 1982. Patterns of ectomycorrhizal host specificity and potential among Pacific Northwest conifers and fungi. For. Sci. 28: 423-458.Google Scholar
  66. Molina, R., and Trappe, J.M., 1984. Mycorrhiza management in bareroot nurseries. In: Forest nursery manual: production of bareroot seedlings. Martinus Nijhoff/Dr. W. Junk Publishers, The Hague, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
  67. Moora, M., Opik, M., and Zobel, M., 2004, Performance of two Centaurea species in response to different root-associated microbial communities and to alterations in nutrient availability. Ann. Bot. Fennici. 41: 263-271.Google Scholar
  68. Moynahan, O.S., Zabinski, C.A., and Gannon, J.E., 2002, Microbial community structure and carbon-utilization diversity in a mine tailings revegetation study. Restor. Ecol. 10: 77-87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Newsham, K.K., Fitter, A.H., and Watkinson, A.R., 1995, Multi-functionality and biodiversity in arbuscular mycorrhizas. Trends Ecol. Evol. 10: 407-411.Google Scholar
  70. Oliveira R.S., Vosátka, M., and Dodd, J.C., 2005, Studies on the diversity of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and the efficacy of two native isolates in a highly alkaline anthropogenic sediment. Mycorrhiza 16: 23-31.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. Ortega, U., Dunabeitia, M., Menendez, S., Gonzalez-Muria, C., and Majada, J., 2004, Effectiveness of mycorrhizal inoculation in the nursery on growth and water relation of Pinus radiate in different water regimes. Tree Physiol. 24: 64-73.Google Scholar
  72. Pera, J., Alvarez, I.F., Rincon, A.M., and Parlardé, J., 1999, Field performance in northern Spain of Douglas-fir seedlings inoculated with ectomycorrhizal fungi. Mycorrhiza 9: 77-84.Google Scholar
  73. Pérez-Moreno, J., and Read, D.J., 2000, Mobilization and transfer of nutrients from litter to treeGoogle Scholar
  74. Perry, D.A., Molina, R., and Amaranthus, M.P., 1987, Mycorrhizae, mycorrhizospheres, and reforestation: current knowledge and research needs. Can. J. For. Res. 17: 929-940.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Peterson, R.L., Massicotte, H.B., and Melville, L.H., 2004, Mycorrhizas: anatomy and cell biology. CABI, NRC Research Press, Ottawa, Canada, NRC Monographs, 173 pp.Google Scholar
  76. Quoreshi, A.M., 2003, Nutritional preconditioning and ectomycorrhizal formation of Picea marina (Mill.) B.S.P. seedlings. Eurasian J. For. Res. 6(1): 1-63.Google Scholar
  77. Quoreshi, A.M., and Timmer, V.R., 1998, Exponential fertilization increases nutrition and ectomycorrhizal development of black spruce seedling. Can. J. For. Res. 28: 674-682.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Quoreshi, A.M., Khasa, D.P., Bois, G., Jany, J.L., Begrand, E., McCurdy, D., and Fung, M., 2005, Mycorrhizal biotechnology for reclamation of oil sand composite tailings and tailings land in Alberta. In: The thin green line: a symposium on the state-of-the-art in reforestation proceedings, S.J., Colombo ed.,. Thin Green Line Symposium - Thunder Bay, Ontario, Ontario Forest Research Institute, Forest Research Information Paper No. 160, pp. 122-127.Google Scholar
  79. Quoreshi, A.M., Roy, S., Greer, C.W., Beaudin, J., McCurdy, D., and Khasa, D.P., 2007, Inoculation of green alder (Alnus crispa) with Frankia-ectomycorrhizal fungal inoculants under commercial nursery production conditions. Native Plants J. 8(3): 271-280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Quoreshi, A.M., Kernanghan, G., and Hunt, G., 2008a, Mycorrhizal fungi in Canadian forest nurseries and the success of inoculated seedlings. NRC Monographs, Ottawa, Canada (in press).Google Scholar
  81. Quoreshi, A.M., Piché, Y., and Khasa, D.P., 2008b, Field performance of conifer and hard-wood species five years after nursery inoculation in the Canadian Prairie Provinces. New For. 35: 235-253.Google Scholar
  82. Rao, A.V., and Tak, R., 2002, Growth of different tree species and their nutrient uptake in limestone mine spoil as influenced by arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM)-fungi in Indian arid zone. J. Arid Environ. 51: 113-119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Read, D.J., 1991, Mycorrhizas in ecosystems. Experimen. 47: 74-84.Google Scholar
  84. Read, D.J., 1992, The mycorrhizal fungal community with special reference to nutrient mobilization. In: The fungal community: it’s organization and role in the ecosystem, 2nd edition,G.C., Carrol, and D.T., Wicklow eds., Marcel Dekker, New York, pp. 631-652.Google Scholar
  85. Read, D.J., Leake, J.R., and Langdale, A.R., 1989, The nitrogen nutrition of mycorrhizal fungi and their host plants. In: Nitrogen, phosphorus, and sulphur utilization by fungi, L. Boddy, R. Marchant, and D. J. Read eds., Cambridge University Press, England, pp. 181-204.Google Scholar
  86. Rowe, H.I., Brown, C.S., and Claassen, V.P., 2007, Comparisions of mycorrhizal res-ponsiveness with field soil and commercial inoculum for six native Montane species and Bromus tectorum. Restor. Ecol. 15: 44-52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Sarand, I., Timonen, S., Koivula, T., Peltola, R., Haahtela, K., Sen, R., and Romantschuk, M., 1999, Tolerance and biodegradation of m-toluate by Scots pine, a mycorrhizal fungus and fluorescent pseudomonads individually and under associative conditions. J. Appl. Microbiol. 86: 817-826.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  88. Sébastien R., Khasa, D.P., and Greer, C.W., 2007, Combining alders, frankiae, and mycorrhizae for the revegetation and remediation of contaminated ecosystems. Can. J. Bot. 85: 237-251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Sharma, S., and Dohroo, N.P., 1996, Vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizae in plant health and disease management. Int. J. Trop. Plant Dis. 14: 147-155.Google Scholar
  90. Smith, S.M., and Read, D., 1997, Mycorrhizal symbiosis, 2nd edition, Academic, London.Google Scholar
  91. Stenstrom, E., Ek, M., and Unestam, T., 1990, Variation in field response of Pinus sylvestris to nursery inoculation with four different ectomycorrhizal fungi. Can. J. For. Res. 20: 1796-1803.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Sylvia, D.M., and Williams, S.E., 1992, Vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizae and environmental stress. In: Mycorrhizae in sustainable agriculture, R.G., Linderman, and G.J., Bethlenfalvay eds., Special Publication No. 54, American Society of Agronomy Madison, WI, pp. 101-124.Google Scholar
  93. Trappe, J.M., 1977, Selection of fungi for ectomycorrhizal inoculation in nurseries. Ann. Rev. Phytopathol. 15: 203-222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Ursic, M., Peterson, R.L., and Husband, B., 1997, Relative abundance of mycorrhizal fungi and frequency of root rot on Pinus strobus seedlings in a southern Ontario nursery. Can. J. For. Res. 27: 54-62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Van den Driessche, R., 1991, Effects of nutrients on stock performance in the forest. In: Mineral nutrition of conifer seedlings. CRC, Boca Ration, FL/Ann Arbor, MI/Boston, MA, pp. 229-260.Google Scholar
  96. Villeneuve, N., LeTacon, F., and Bouchard, D., 1991, Survival of inoculated Laccaria bicolor in competition with native ectomycorrhizal fungi and effects on the growth of outplanted Douglas-fir seedlings. Plant Soil 135: 95-107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Yamanaka, T., Li, C.-Y., Bormann, B.T., and Okabe, H., 2002, Triplicate association in an alder: effects of Frankia and Alpova diplophloeus on the growth, nitrogen fixation and mineral acquisition of Alnus tenuifolia. Plant Soil 254: 179-186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Yu, T.E. J.-C., Egger, K.N., and Peterson, R.L., 2001, Ectoendomycorrhizal associations -characteristics and functions. Mycorrhiza 11: 167-177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Zak, J.C., and Parkinson, D., 1983, Effect of surface emendations on vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal development of slender wheatgrass: a 4-year study. Can. J. Bot. 61: 798-803.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media B.V 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ali M. Quoreshi
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Symbiotech Research Inc.Canada
  2. 2.Department Sciences of Wood and the ForestUniversité LavalCanada

Personalised recommendations