Advertisement

The Accuracy of Molecular Processes

The Case of Homologous Recombination
Conference paper
  • 527 Downloads
Part of the NATO Science for Peace and Security Series B: Physics and Biophysics book series (NAPSB)

Abstract

Recombination is arguably one of the most fundamental mechanisms driving genetic diversity during evolution. Recombination takes place in one way or another from viruses such as HIV and polio, to bacteria, and finally to man. In both prokaryotes and eukaryotes, homologous recombination is assisted by enzymes, recombinases, that promote the exchange of strands between two segments of DNA, thereby creating new genetic combinations. In bacteria, homologous recombination takes place as a pathway for the repair of DNA lesions and also during horizontal or lateral gene transfer processes, in which cells take in exogenous pieces of DNA. This allows bacteria to evolve rapidly by acquiring large sequences of DNA, a process which would take too long by gene duplications and single mutations. I will survey recent results on the fidelity of homologous recombination as catalyzed by the bacterial recombinase RecA. These results show discrimination up to the level of single base mismatches, during the initial stages of the recombination process. A cascaded kinetic proofreading process is proposed to explain this high discrimination. Kinetic proofreading ideas are also reviewed.

Keywords

Homologous recombination DNA RecA FRET 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Spratt, B.G., Hanage, W.P. and Feil, E.J. (2001) The relative contributions of recombination and point mutation to the diversification of bacterial clones. Curr. Opin. Microbiol., 4, 602–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bianchi, M.E. and Radding, C.M. (1983) Insertions, deletions and mismatches in heteroduplex DNA made by recA protein. Cell, 35, 511–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Morel, P., Stasiak, A., Ehrlich, S.D. and Cassuto, E. (1994) Effect of length and location of heterologous sequences on RecA-mediated strand exchange. J. Biol. Chem., 269, 19830–19835.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bucka, A. and Stasiak, A. (2001) RecA-mediated strand exchange traverses substitutional heterologies more easily than deletions or insertions. Nucleic Acids Res., 29, 2464–2470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Feng, G., Tsui, H.C.T. and Winkler, M.E. (1996) Depletion of the cellular amounts of the MutS and MutH methyl-directed mismatch repair proteins in stationary-phase Escherichia coli K-12 cells. J. Bacterial., 178, 2388–2396.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bregeon, D., Matic, I., Radman, M. and Taddei, F. (1999) Inefficient mismatch repair: genetic defects and down regulation. J. Genet., 78, 21–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Masson, J.Y. and West, S.C. (2001) The Rad51 and Dmc1 recombinases: a non-identical twin relationship. Trends Biochem. Sci., 26, 131–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sagi, D., Tlusty, T. and Stavans, J. (2006) High fidelity of RecA-catalyzed recombination: a watchdog of genetic diversity. Nucleic Acids Res., 34, 5021–5031.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bazemore, L.R., FoltaStogniew, E., Takahashi, M. and Radding, C.M. (1997) RecA tests homology at both pairing and strand exchange. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 94, 11863–11868.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Malkov, V.A., Sastry, L. and Camerini-Otero, R.D. (1997) RecA protein assisted selection reveals a low fidelity of recognition of homology in a duplex DNA by an oligonucleotide. J. Mol. Biol., 271, 168–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Majewski, J. and Cohan, F.M. (1999) DNA sequence similarity requirements for interspecific recombination in bacillus. Genetics, 153, 1525–1533.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Shen, R and Huang, H.V. (1986) Homologous recombination in Escherichia coli: dependence on substrate length and homology. Genetics, 112, 441–457.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ninio, J. (1975) Kinetic amplification of enzyme discrimination, Biochimie, 57, 587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hopfield, J.J. (1974) Kinetic Proofreading: A New Mechanism for Reducing Errors in Biosnythetic Processes Requiring High Specificity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 71(10), 4135–4139.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media B.V 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Physics of Complex SystemsWeizmann Institute of ScienceRehovotIsrael

Personalised recommendations