Advertisement

Designing Business Education for Ukraine: Lessons Learned

  • S.L. Smith
  • V.M. Mikelonis
Part of the Advances in Business Education and Training book series (ABET, volume 1)

Abstract

This paper delineates a seven-year program in Ukraine that took a systemic approach to initiating change in the design of undergraduate, post-diploma, and MBA, business programs. Five design principles guided the process: (1) designing curriculum based on stakeholder needs and accreditation standards; (2) determining the appropriate balance of hard and soft skills in the curriculum; (3) focusing on attitude change, the need for continuing education, and ‘learning how to learn;’ (4) designing integrative rather than exclusively discipline-based education; and (5) developing partnerships with a variety of stakeholders in Ukraine, the United States, and Poland.

Key Words

Ukraine business education economic development CEUME Center for Nations in Transition 

References

  1. Archibald, S. O., Banu, L., & Bochniarz, Z. (2005), Market liberalisation and sustainability in transition: turning points and trends in Central and Eastern Europe. In J. Carmin, & S. Van Deveer (Eds.). EU Enlargement and the Environment: Institutional Change and Environmental Policy in Central and Eastern Europe, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  2. Barnes, L. R., Christensen, J., & Hansen, A. (1994). Teaching and the Case Method. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  3. Bochniarz, Z. (2005). Critical Factors for Success: Building human capital for a competitive economy in Ukraine, Ukrainian Management Education Journal Synergy, 1(12), 38–43.Google Scholar
  4. CEUME. (2001). Business Management Education in Ukraine: A Blueprint for Action. Kyiv: CEUME.Google Scholar
  5. CEUME. (2002). Business Management Education in Ukraine: An Action Update. Kyiv: CEUME.Google Scholar
  6. CEUME. (2005). Business Management Education in Ukraine: Achieving. Results on the Road to Sustainable Development, 2002–2005. Minneapolis, MN: Center for Nations in Transition, University of Minnesota.Google Scholar
  7. CEUME. (2005b). Business Management Education in Ukraine: Progress Dynamics. 2005 Research Yearbook. Kyiv: CEUME.Google Scholar
  8. Halpern, D. F. (1997). Critical Thinking Across the Curriculum (3rd Ed.). Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  9. Karpin, D. (1995). Enterprising Nation: Renewing Australia's Managers to Meet the Challenge of the Asia-Pacific Century. Canberra: AGPS.Google Scholar
  10. Knowles, M. S., Holton, E. F., & Swanson, R. A. (1998). The Adult Learner: The Definitive Classic in Adult Education and Human Resource Development (5th Ed.). Houston, TX: Gulf Publishing.Google Scholar
  11. Kolb, D. A. (1995). Organizational Behavior: An Experiential Approach to Human Behavior in Organizations. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  12. Krazhan, A. (2005). Ukrainian management education: stakeholders’ perspectives, needs and practices. Ukrainian Management Education Journal Synergy, 1(12), 11–15.Google Scholar
  13. Mikelonis, V. M. (2002). Re-inventing the academy in Ukraine, Ukrainian Management Education Journal Synergy, 3(3), 113–126.Google Scholar
  14. Pea, R. D. (1994). Seeing what we build together: distributed multimedia learning environments for transformative communications, The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 3(3), 285–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Rogers, E.M. (1995). Diffusion of Innovations (4th Ed.). New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  16. Smith, S. L. & Mikelonis, V. M. (in press). Incorporating ‘shock and aha!’ into curriculum design: Internationalizing technical communication courses. In St. K. Amant, & B. Thatcher (Eds.) Teaching Intercultural Rhetoric and Technical Communication: Theories, Curriculum, Pedagogies, and Practice. Amityville, NY: Baywood Publishers.Google Scholar
  17. Wiggins, G., & McTighe, J. (1998). Understanding by Design. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.Google Scholar
  18. Wilson, B. & Cole, P. (1997). Cognitive models of teaching. In D. H. Jonassen (Ed.) Handbook of Research in Instructional Technology. New York: MacMillan.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • S.L. Smith
    • 1
  • V.M. Mikelonis
  1. 1.University of MinnesotaUSA

Personalised recommendations