Skip to main content

Virtual Teamwork: A Product of Globalization

Implications for University Education

  • Chapter

Part of the book series: Advances in Business Education and Training ((ABET,volume 1))

Abstract

With globalization, virtual teamwork is becoming the predominant type of labor organization within multinational companies. Empirical studies on this new form of teamwork show that besides requiring specific knowledge, this teamwork requires social skills, as well as media and methodological competencies. The Bologna-Process has produced, for European universities, a clear framework on how to prepare young professionals for the challenges of their future working lives by focusing on extra-curricular activities and developing personal core competencies. Accordingly, this chapter outlines how to prepare students for work in a virtual team environment, which requires fundamental reforms to university education. A key element of proposed reforms is the introduction of Collaborative Computer Supported Learning as the leading didactic principle, especially in postgraduate studies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    For a clear description of the growing complexity of systems (companies) cf the system theory developed by Niklas Luhmann. Accordingly, the system is defined as a set of elements and relations which are dependent upon each other. A company is insofar an Open System, as it exists in mutual relation (input and output relation) to its environment. The generic term globalization describes a development which implies a growing number of system elements with a theoretical geometric progression and an increasing number of relations. If one does not simply count the elements, but rather considers the qualitative diversity of these and the time dimension according to the variety of elements and relations, then the complexity of the economic systems (companies) becomes apparent (Luhmann, 1997).

  2. 2.

    Computer Supported Collaborative Learning is abbreviated to CSCL.

  3. 3.

    Collaborative and cooperative learning are not used as synonyms. In cooperative learning work, tasks are hierarchical in independent areas that are divided from each other; team work is needed only at the end for summarizing the single parts. In collaborative work, the division of the whole into parts is more or less impossible as the complexity of tasks requires a high degree of interdependence in work and solution processes.

References

  • Bell, B. S., & Kozlowski, S. W. J. (2002). A typology of virtual teams, implications for effective leadership. Journal of Group & Organization Management, 27(1), 14–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chur, D. (2006). (Aus-) Bildungsqualität durch Schlüsselkompetenzen – zur Konkretisierung eines integrativen Bildungsverständnisses. Forthcoming In N.Colin, A. Lattard, & J. Umlauf (Eds.). Germanistik – eine europäische Wissenschaft ? Der Bologna Prozess als Herausforderung. http://www.uni-heidelberg.de/studium/SLK/dokumente/paris2.pdf. Accessed 28 April, 2006.

  • European Union Commission. (2006). Implementing the renewed partnership for growth and jobs, developing a knowledge flagship: the European Institute of Technology. Communication from the Commission to the European Council, COM 77 final. http://europa.eu.int/eurlex/lex/LexUriServ/site/en/com/2006/com2006_0077en01.pdf. Accessed 28 April, 2006.

  • Hall, E. T., & Hall, M. R. (1987). Hidden differences. Garden city, New York: Anchor Press/Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, E. T., & Hall, M. R. (1990). Understanding cultural differences, Maine: Intcultural Press Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinds, P. J., & Bailey, D. E. (2003). Out of sight, out of sync: Understanding conflict in distributed teams, Journal of Organization Sciences, 14(6), 615–632.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, G. (1983). The cultural relativity of organizational practices and theories, Journal of International Business Studies, 14(2), 75–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirschner, P. A., Martens, R. L., & Strijbos, J. W. (2004). CSCL in higher education. In J. W. Strijbos, P. A. Kirschner & R. L. Martens (Eds.), What we know about computer-supported collaborative learning (CSCL)—And implementing it in higher education. (3–30). London: Kluwer Academic Publisher.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann, N. (1997). Die Gesellschaft der Gesellschaft, Band 1. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (2000). Knowledge management in the learning society. Paris: OECD Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (2001). The Definition and Selection of Key Competencies (DeSeCo). http://www.portal-stat.admin.ch/deseco/news.htm. Accessed 28. April 2006.

  • Orlikowski, B., Hertel, G., & Konradt, U. (2004). Führung und Erfolg in virtuellen Teams. Arbeit, 13(1) 33–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paavola, S., Lipponen, L., & Hakkarainen, K. (2004). Models of innovative knowledge communities and three metaphors of learning, Journal of Review of Educational Research, 74(4), 557–576.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Polanyi, M. (1967). The tacit dimension. Garden City, New York: Anchor Press/Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Redman, C. A. & Sankar, C. (2003). Results of an experiment comparing the analysis of Chick-fil—A case study by virtual teams versus face-to-face teams. Journal of SMET Education, 4(1&2), 55–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schäfers, B. (1999). Einführung in die Gruppensoziologie (3rd ed.). Wiesbaden: UTB.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strijbos, J. -W., Kirschner, P. A., & Martens, R. L. (2004). What we know about Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning (CSCL)—And implementing it in higher education. Boston, Dordrecht, New York, London: Kluwer Academic Publisher.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinkauf, K., & Woywode, M. (2004). Erfolgsfaktoren von virtuellen Teams—Ergebnisse einer aktuellen Studie. Zeitschrift für betriebswirtschaftliche Forschung 56(6), 393–492.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lenz, R., Machado, C. (2008). Virtual Teamwork: A Product of Globalization. In: Barsky, N.P., Clements, M., Ravn, J., Smith, K. (eds) The Power of Technology for Learning. Advances in Business Education and Training, vol 1. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8747-9_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics