Advertisement

Virtual Teamwork: A Product of Globalization

Implications for University Education
  • Rainer Lenz
  • Carlos Machado
Part of the Advances in Business Education and Training book series (ABET, volume 1)

Abstract

With globalization, virtual teamwork is becoming the predominant type of labor organization within multinational companies. Empirical studies on this new form of teamwork show that besides requiring specific knowledge, this teamwork requires social skills, as well as media and methodological competencies. The Bologna-Process has produced, for European universities, a clear framework on how to prepare young professionals for the challenges of their future working lives by focusing on extra-curricular activities and developing personal core competencies. Accordingly, this chapter outlines how to prepare students for work in a virtual team environment, which requires fundamental reforms to university education. A key element of proposed reforms is the introduction of Collaborative Computer Supported Learning as the leading didactic principle, especially in postgraduate studies.

Key Words

Virtual teamwork competences computer-supported collaborative learning 

References

  1. Bell, B. S., & Kozlowski, S. W. J. (2002). A typology of virtual teams, implications for effective leadership. Journal of Group & Organization Management, 27(1), 14–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Chur, D. (2006). (Aus-) Bildungsqualität durch Schlüsselkompetenzen – zur Konkretisierung eines integrativen Bildungsverständnisses. Forthcoming In N.Colin, A. Lattard, & J. Umlauf (Eds.). Germanistik – eine europäische Wissenschaft ? Der Bologna Prozess als Herausforderung. http://www.uni-heidelberg.de/studium/SLK/dokumente/paris2.pdf. Accessed 28 April, 2006.
  3. European Union Commission. (2006). Implementing the renewed partnership for growth and jobs, developing a knowledge flagship: the European Institute of Technology. Communication from the Commission to the European Council, COM 77 final. http://europa.eu.int/eurlex/lex/LexUriServ/site/en/com/2006/com2006_0077en01.pdf. Accessed 28 April, 2006.
  4. Hall, E. T., & Hall, M. R. (1987). Hidden differences. Garden city, New York: Anchor Press/Doubleday.Google Scholar
  5. Hall, E. T., & Hall, M. R. (1990). Understanding cultural differences, Maine: Intcultural Press Inc.Google Scholar
  6. Hinds, P. J., & Bailey, D. E. (2003). Out of sight, out of sync: Understanding conflict in distributed teams, Journal of Organization Sciences, 14(6), 615–632.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hofstede, G. (1983). The cultural relativity of organizational practices and theories, Journal of International Business Studies, 14(2), 75–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Kirschner, P. A., Martens, R. L., & Strijbos, J. W. (2004). CSCL in higher education. In J. W. Strijbos, P. A. Kirschner & R. L. Martens (Eds.), What we know about computer-supported collaborative learning (CSCL)—And implementing it in higher education. (3–30). London: Kluwer Academic Publisher.Google Scholar
  9. Luhmann, N. (1997). Die Gesellschaft der Gesellschaft, Band 1. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  10. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (2000). Knowledge management in the learning society. Paris: OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
  11. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (2001). The Definition and Selection of Key Competencies (DeSeCo). http://www.portal-stat.admin.ch/deseco/news.htm. Accessed 28. April 2006.
  12. Orlikowski, B., Hertel, G., & Konradt, U. (2004). Führung und Erfolg in virtuellen Teams. Arbeit, 13(1) 33–47.Google Scholar
  13. Paavola, S., Lipponen, L., & Hakkarainen, K. (2004). Models of innovative knowledge communities and three metaphors of learning, Journal of Review of Educational Research, 74(4), 557–576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Polanyi, M. (1967). The tacit dimension. Garden City, New York: Anchor Press/Doubleday.Google Scholar
  15. Redman, C. A. & Sankar, C. (2003). Results of an experiment comparing the analysis of Chick-fil—A case study by virtual teams versus face-to-face teams. Journal of SMET Education, 4(1&2), 55–61.Google Scholar
  16. Schäfers, B. (1999). Einführung in die Gruppensoziologie (3rd ed.). Wiesbaden: UTB.Google Scholar
  17. Strijbos, J. -W., Kirschner, P. A., & Martens, R. L. (2004). What we know about Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning (CSCL)—And implementing it in higher education. Boston, Dordrecht, New York, London: Kluwer Academic Publisher.Google Scholar
  18. Weinkauf, K., & Woywode, M. (2004). Erfolgsfaktoren von virtuellen Teams—Ergebnisse einer aktuellen Studie. Zeitschrift für betriebswirtschaftliche Forschung 56(6), 393–492.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rainer Lenz
    • 1
  • Carlos Machado
  1. 1.University of Applied Sciences BielefeldGermany

Personalised recommendations