Skip to main content

Factors for E-Services System Acceptance: A Multivariate Analysis

  • Conference paper
Advances in Computer and Information Sciences and Engineering
  • 1875 Accesses

Abstract

This study investigates factors that influence the acceptance and use of e-Services. The research model includes factors such as user experience, user motivation, perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use in explaining the process of e-Services acceptance, use and continued use. The two core variables of the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM), perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use, are integrated into the Electronic Services Acceptance Model (E-SAM).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bhattacherjee, A. (2001). “Understanding Information Systems continuance.” MIS Quarterly 25(3): 351-370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. D’Ambra, J., and Rice, R.E. (2001). “Emerging factors in user evaluation of the world wide web.” Inf. and Mgt 38: 373-84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Karahanna, E., Straub, D.W., and Chervany, N.L., (1999). “Information Technology Adoption Across Time: A Cross-Sectional Comparison of Pre-Adoption and Post-Adoption Beliefs.” MIS Quarterly 23(2): 183-213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. M., and Liu, V. (2003). “Satisfaction with Internet-Based Services: The Role of Expectations and Desires”. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 7(2):31-49.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Xue, M., Harker, P.T., and Heim, G.R. (2004). “Incorporating the dual customer roles in e-Service design.” The working paper series. The Wharton Financial Institutions Center.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hsu, M., and Chu, C. (2004). “Predicting electronic service continuance with a decomposed theory of planned behaviour.” Behaviour and Information Technology, September–October 2004, 23(5): 359–373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Chin, W. W. (1998). “The partial least squares approach for structural equation modelling.” Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Rummel, R. J. (1970). “Applied factor analysis.” Evanston, ILL: Northwestern University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Koufaris, M. (2002). “Applying the Technology Acceptance Model and Flow Theory to Online Consumer Behaviour.” Info. Systems Research 13(2): 205-223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Cronbach, L. J. (1971). “Test validation. Education Measurement.” American council on education, Washington D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Nunnally, J. C. (1978). “Psychometric theory.” McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Dillon, A., and Gabbard, R. (1998). “Hypermedia as an Educational Technology: A Review of the Quantitative Research Literature on Learner Comprehension, Control, and Style.” Review of Educational Research, 68(3): 322-349.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1975). “Beyond boredom and anxiety.” Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Venkatesh, V., and Spier, C. (2000). “Computer technology training in the workplace: A longitudinal investigation of the effect of mood.” Organisational Behaviour and Human Decision Processes, forthcoming.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Venkatesh, V. (1999). “Creation of favourable user perceptions: Exploring the role of intrinsic motivation.” MIS Quarterly 23(2): 239-60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Davis, F. D. (1989). “Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology.” MIS Quarterly 13(2): 319-40.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Bandura, A. (1986). “Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory.” Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Heijden, H. (2000). “Using the Technology Acceptance Model to predict Website Usage: Extension and empirical test.” Research Memorandum, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Hair, J. F., Anderson, R.E., Tatham, R.L., and Black, W.C. (1995). “Multivariate data analysis with reading.” Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Gelderman, M. (1998). “The relation between user satisfaction, usage of information systems and performance.” Information and Management 34: 11-18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Bianchinia, D., Antonellisa, V., Pernicib, B., and Plebanib, P. (2006). “Ontology-based methodology for e-service discovery.” Information Systems 31 (2006) 361–380”

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this paper

Cite this paper

Sandhu, K. (2008). Factors for E-Services System Acceptance: A Multivariate Analysis. In: Sobh, T. (eds) Advances in Computer and Information Sciences and Engineering. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8741-7_41

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8741-7_41

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-8740-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-8741-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics