Skip to main content

A Comparison of Software for Architectural Simulation of Natural Light

  • Conference paper
Advances in Computer and Information Sciences and Engineering

Abstract

This paper reports a study with daylighting simulation in the architectural design process, through the evaluation of two simulation tools – ECOTECT 5.5 (as interface to RADIANCE) and RELUX2006 VISION. This study was developed from the architect’s point of view and in the context of the design process. The evaluation was conducted taking into account criteria such as User Interface, Geometry, Output, Daylight Parameters, Material Description, Processing, Validation, and User Support. Among these criteria, User Interface is especially important for the architect. It is the best way to overcome the natural barriers in using digital processes in architectural design, with the objective of reaching environmental comfort and energy efficiency. The methodology used includes a large number of simulations in tropical climate, aiming at testing the simulation tools in different daylight conditions in Brazil. The results of this evaluation show a great potential for improving the use of simulation tools in the design process, through a better understanding of these tools.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Erlich, Charles K. “Computer Aided Perception: A Method to Evaluate the Representation of Glare in Computer Graphics Imagery”, 2002. Masters Dissertation – University of California, Berkley, USA, 2002

    Google Scholar 

  2. Amorim, Claudia N.D. “Iluminação natural, conforto ambiental e eficiência energética no projeto de arquitetura: estratégias projetuais e tecnológicas para climas tropicais”. Brasilia. Research Project (Edital CT - Energ/CNPq 01/2003), Brasilia, 2003

    Google Scholar 

  3. Mendes, Nathan, Lamberts, Roberto and NETO, José A. B. C. “Building Simulation in Brazil” in IBPSA, August, 2001

    Google Scholar 

  4. International Energy Agency. IeA, Daylight in Buildings: A Source Book on Daylighting Systems and Components: A Report of Iea Task 21/ Ecbcs, Annex 29, July, 2000

    Google Scholar 

  5. Christakou, Evangelos D. “A simulação computacional da luz natural aplicada ao projeto de arquitetura”, Masters Dissertation, Brasilia, DF, Brazil, 2004

    Google Scholar 

  6. Altman, Kurt and Apian-Bennewitz, Peter, “Report on an Investigation of the Application and Limits of Currently Available Programme Types for Photorealistic Rendering of Light and Lighting in Architecture” - The Kimbell Art Museum as a Case Study for Lightscape, Radiance and 3D-Studio MAX - April 7, 2001

    Google Scholar 

  7. Khoudolev, Andrei. “Comparison of Two Methods of Global Illumination Analysis”. Keldysh Institute of Applied Mathematics, Russian Academy of Sciences - Moscow, 1996

    Google Scholar 

  8. Inanici, Mehlika N. “Application of the State-of-the-Art Computer Simulation and Visualization in Architectural Lighting Research”. In: Building Simulation - Seventh International IBPSA Conference, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, August, 2001

    Google Scholar 

  9. Roy, Geoffrey G. “A Comparative Study of Lighting Simulation Packages Suitable for Use in Architectural Design”. [S.L.]: Murdoch University, Australia, 2000. http://wwweng.murdoch.edu.au/FTPsite/daylighting.html

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this paper

Cite this paper

Christakou, E., Silva, N. (2008). A Comparison of Software for Architectural Simulation of Natural Light. In: Sobh, T. (eds) Advances in Computer and Information Sciences and Engineering. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8741-7_25

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8741-7_25

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-8740-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-8741-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics