Skip to main content

Epistemic Structured Representation for Legal Transcript Analysis

  • Conference paper
Book cover Advances in Computer and Information Sciences and Engineering

Abstract

HTML based standards and the new XML based standards for digital transcripts generated by court recorders offer more search and analysis options than the traditional CAT (Computer Aided Transcription) technology. The LegalXml standards are promising opportunities for new methods of search for legal documents. However, the search techniques employed are still largely restricted to keyword search and various probabilistic association techniques. Rather than keyword and association searches, we are interested in semantic and inference-based search. In this paper, a process for transforming the semi-structured representation of the digital transcript to an epistemic structured representation that supports semantic and inference-based search is explored.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Li, Ping, and Kenneth W. Church, “A Sketch Algorithm for Estimating Two-Way and Multi-Way Associations”, Association for Computational Linguistics, Vol. 33. No 3, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Minker, Jack, “Control Structure of a Pattern-Directed Search System”, SIGART Newsletter, No. 63, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Lewis, C.I., “A Survey of Symbolic Logic,” Berkeley: University of California Press , 1918. \bibitem Kripke, S., “Semantical Considerations on Modal Logic,” Acta Philosophica Fennica, pp. 16, 83-94, 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Kripke, S., ``Semantical Considerations on Modal Logic,'' Acta Philosophica Fennica, pp. 16, 83-94, 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hintikka, J., “Individuals, Possible Worlds and Epistemic Logic,” Nous, pp. 1, 33-62, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hintikka, J., “Knowledge and Belief: An Introduction to the Logic of the Two Notions,” Cornell: Cornell University Press, 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Doignon, J.P., and J.C. Falmagne, “Knowledge Spaces,” Hiedelberg; Springer ISBN-3-540-64501-2, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Nirenburg, S., and V. Raskin, “Ontological Semantics,” MIT Press, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Sowa, J.F., “Semantics of Conceptual Graphs,” Proceeding of the 17th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computation Linguistics, pp. 39-44, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Brasil, S.M., and B.B. Garcia, “Modeling Legal Reasoning in a Mathematical Environment through Model Theoretic Semantics,” ICAIL ‘03. Edinburgh, Scotland, UK, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Minsky, M., “A framework for representing knowledge,” The psychology of computer vision. New York: McGraw-Hill, pp. 211-277, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Covington, M., “Natural Language Processing For Prolog Programmers,” Prentice Hall, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Cussens, J., and S. Pulman, “Incorporating Linguistics Constraints into Inductive Logic Programming,” Proceedings of CoNLL-2000 and LLL-2000, pp. 184-193. Lisbon, Portugal, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Bergadano, F., and D. Gunetti, “Inductive Logic Programming From Machine Learning to Software Engineering,” MIT Press, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Lehnert, W.G., “The Process of Question Answering,” Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., Publishers, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Gettier, E., “Is Justified True Belief Knowledge?,” Analysis, Vol.23, pp. 121-23. 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Dancy, J., “Contemporary Epistemology,” Basil Blackwell Inc., 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Chen, G., J. Choi, and C. Jo, “The New Approach to BDI Agent-Based Modeling,” ACM Symposium on Applied Computing ‘04. Nicosia, Cyprus, 2004. \bibitem Blackburn, P., and J. Bos, “Representation and Inference for Natural Language,” CSLI Publications, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Blackburn, P., and J. Bos, ``Representation and Inference for Natural Language,'' CSLI Publications, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Fagin, R., J. Halbern and M. Vard, “Model Theoretic Analysis of Knowledge,” Journal of Association for Computing Machinery,Vol 38. No. 2, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this paper

Cite this paper

Hughes, T., Hughes, C., Lazar, A. (2008). Epistemic Structured Representation for Legal Transcript Analysis. In: Sobh, T. (eds) Advances in Computer and Information Sciences and Engineering. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8741-7_19

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8741-7_19

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-8740-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-8741-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics