Abstract
This paper introduces ubiquitous learning and a methodological model called Learning Activity Model and associated procedures, which will help instructional designers to produce innovative ubiquitous learning scenarios.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
T. Waite, J. Kirkley, R. Pendleton, and L. Turner, “MUSEpad: Supporting information accessibility through mobile location-based technology,” TechTrends, Vol. 49, No. 3, 2005, pp. 76-82.
S. Robertson, J. Calder, P. Fung, A. Jones and T. O’Shea, “The use and effectiveness of palmtop computers in education,” British Journal of Educational Technology, Vol. 28, No. 3, 1997, pp. 177-189.
S. Kim, K. Holmes, and C. Mims, “Mobile wireless technology use and implementation: Opening a dialogues on the new technologies in Education,” TechTrends, Vol. 49, No. 3, 2005, pp. 54-63.
K. Sakamura and N. Koshizuka, “Ubiquitous computing technologies for ubiquitous learning,” IEEE International Workshop on Wireless and Mobile Technologies in Education, Nov. 2005, pp. 11-20.
E. Dieterle, C. Dede, and K. Schrier, “Neomillennial learning styles propagated by wireless handheld devices,” in Ubiquitous and pervasive knowledge and learning management: Semantics, social networking and new media to their full potential, M. Lytras and A. Naeve, Eds. Hershey, PA: Idea Group, Inc., in press.
M. P. Driscoll, Psychology of learning for instruction, 2nd Ed. Needham Heights, MA: A Pearson Education Company, 1994.
T. M. Duffy and D. J. Cunningham, “Constructivism: Implications for the design and delivery of instruction,” in Handbook of research for educational communications and technology, D. H. Jonassen, Ed. New York: Macmillan LIBRARY Reference USA, 1996, pp. 170-198.
D. H. Jonassen and L. R. Ronhrer-Murphy, “Activity theory as a framework for designing constructive learning environments,” Educational Technology Research and Development, Vol. 47, No. 1, 1999, pp. 61-79.
Y. Engestrom, Learning by expanding. Helsinki: Orienta-konsultit, 1987
Y. Engestrom, “Activity theory and individual and social transformation,” in Perspectives on activity theory, Y. Engeström, R. Miettinen and R. Punamaki, Eds. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press, 1999, pp. 19-38.
C. Quintana, B. J. Reiser, E. A. Davis, J. Krajcik, E. Fretz, R. G. Duncan, E. Kyza, D. Edelson, and E. Soloway, “A scaffolding design framework for software to support science inquiry,” The Journal of the Learning Sciences, Vol. 13, No. 3, 2004, pp. 337-386.
J. P. Gee, What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2003.
B. Collis and A. Margaryan, “Applying activity theory to computer-supported collaborative learning and work-based activities in corporate settings,” Educational Technology Research and Development, Vol. 52, No. 4, 2004, pp. 38-52.
G. Zurita and M. Nussbaum, “A conceptual framework based on activity theory for mobile CSCL,” British Journal of Educational Technology, Vol. 38, No. 2, 2007, pp. 211-235.
J. An, S. Kim, M. Park, C. Kim, and E. Ki. “Developing ubiquitous computing service scenarios,” Korean Society of Human-Computer Interaction, Jan. 2005, CD-ROM.
W. Dick and L. Carey, The systematic Design of Instruction, 3rd Ed. New York: HarperCollins College Publishers, 1996.
J. M. Keller, “Development and use of the ARCS model of motivational design,” Journal of Instructional Development, Vol. 10, No. 3, 1987, pp. 2-10.
A. Shepherd, “Hierarchical task analysis and training decisions,” Innovations in Education and Teaching International, Vol. 22. No. 2, 1985, pp. 162-176.
J. An, “Human activity model and information architecture for the development of ubiquitous computing services,” unpublished.
D. Kulak and E. Guiney, Use cases: Requirements in context. New York: ACM Press, 2000.
W. Tumminello, Exploring storyboarding. Thomson Delmar Learning, 2005.
E. De Bono, Six thinking hats, 2nd Ed. Penguin Books Ltd., 2000.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2008 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this paper
Cite this paper
An, J. (2008). Activity Theory for Designing Ubiquitous Learning Scenarios. In: Iskander, M. (eds) Innovative Techniques in Instruction Technology, E-learning, E-assessment, and Education. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8739-4_37
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8739-4_37
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-8738-7
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-8739-4
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)