Recently, more realistic 3D displays have been designed as new, more ecologically valid alternatives to conventional 2D visual displays. However, research has thus far provided inconsistent evidence regarding their effectiveness in promoting learning and task performance. We are interested in the contribution of immersion to 3D image transformations and compare subjects' performance on mental rotation tasks in traditional 2D, 3D non-immersive (3DNI - anaglyphic glasses), and 3D-immersive (3DI - head mounted display with position tracking) environments. Our findings suggest that 2D and 3DNI environments might encourage the use of more “artificial” encoding strategies where the 3D images are encoded with respect to a scene-based frame of reference (i.e. computer screen). On the other hand, 3D immersive environments can provide necessary feedback for an individual to use the same strategy and egocentric frame of reference that he/she would use in a real-world situation. Overall, the results of this study suggest that immersion might be one of the most important aspects to be considered in the design of learning and training environments.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Lee JH, Lim Y, Wiederhold BK, Graham SJ (2005) A functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) study of cue-induced smoking craving in virtual environments. Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback 30: 195–204
Lee JH, Ku J, Kim K, Kim B, Kim IY, Yang BH, et al (2003) Experimental application of virtual reality for nicotine craving through cue exposure. Cy-berPsychol Behav 6: 275–280
Lo Priore C, Castelnuovo G, Liccione D, Liccione D (2003) Experience with V-STORE: Considerations on presence in virtual environments for effective neuropsychological rehabilitation of executive functions. CyberPsychol Behav 6: 281–287
Haskell ID, Wickens CD (1993) Two- and three-dimensional displays for aviation: A theoretical and empirical comparison. Int J of Aviat Psychol 3: 87–109.
Van Orden KF, Broyles JW (2000) Visuospatial task performance as a function of two- and three-dimensional display presentation techniques. Displays 21: 17–24
Kosslyn SM (1980) Image and Mind. Harvard University Press, Cambridge
Pylyshyn ZW (1973) What the mind's eye tells the mind's brain: A critique of mental imagery. Psychol Bull 80: 1–24
Kosslyn SM, Thompson WL, Ganis G (2006) The case for mental imagery. Oxford University Press, New York
Kosslyn SM, Thompson WL, Wraga M, Alpert NM (2001) Imagining rotation by endogenous and exogenous forces: Distinct neural mechanisms for different strategies. Neuroreport 12: 2519–2525
Pylyshyn Z (2003) Return of the mental image: Are there really pictures in the brain? Trends Cogn Sci 7: 113–118
Pylyshyn Z, Dupoux E (2001) Is the imagery debate over? If so, what was it about? MIT Press, Cambridge
Pylyshyn ZW (1981) The imagery debate: Analogue media versus tacit knowledge. Psychol Rev 88: 16–45
Pylyshyn ZW (2002) Mental imagery: In search of a theory. Behav Brain Sci 25: 157–238
Marr D (1982) Vision, Freeman and Company Publishing, San Francisco
Hinton GE (1979) Imagery without arrays. Behav Brain Sci 2: 555–556
Shepard RN, Metzler J (1971) Mental rotation of three-dimensional objects. Science 171: 701–703
Gauthier I, Hayward WG, Tarr MJ, Anderson AW, Skudlarski P, Gore JC (2002) BOLD Activity during Mental Rotation and Viewpoint-Dependent Object Recognition. Neuron 34: 161–171
Kawamichi H, Kikuchi Y, Ueno S (2007) Spatio-temporal brain activity related to rotation method during a mental rotation task of three-dimensional objects: An MEG study. Neuroimage 37: 956–965
Parsons LM (1987) Visual discrimination of abstract mirror-reflected three-dimensional objects at many orientations. Percept Psychophys 42: 49–59
Parsons LM (1995). Inability to reason about an object's orientation using an axis and angle of rotation. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 21: 1259–1277
Hinton GE, Parsons LM (1988) Scene-based and viewer-centered representations for comparing shapes. Cognition 30: 1–35
Loomis JM, Blascovich JJ, Beall AC (1999) Immersive virtual environment technology as a basic research tool in psychology. Behav Res Methods In-strum Comput 31(4), 557–564
WorldViz (2006) Precision position tracker
WorldViz (2007) Vizard VR Toolkit R3: www.worldviz.com.
Pausch R, Proffitt D,Williams G (1997) Quantifying immersion in virtual reality, in Proceedings of SIGGRAPH, ACM
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2008 Springer Science+Business Media B.V
About this paper
Cite this paper
Kozhevnikov, M., Royan, J., Blazhenkova, O., Gorbunov, A. (2008). The Role of Immersivity in Three-Dimensional Mental Rotation. In: Gero, J.S., Goel, A.K. (eds) Design Computing and Cognition '08. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8728-8_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8728-8_8
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-8727-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-8728-8
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)