This paper presents a learning and inference mechanism for unsupervised learning of semantic concepts from purely syntactical examples of design optimization formulation data. Symbolic design formulation is a tough problem from computational and cognitive perspectives, requiring domain and mathematical expertise. By conceptualizing the learning problem as a statistical pattern extraction problem, the algorithm uses previous design experiences to learn design concepts. It then extracts this learnt knowledge for use with new problems. The algorithm is knowledge-lean, needing only the mathematical syntax of the problem as input, and generalizes quickly over a very small training data set. We demonstrate and evaluate the method on a class of hydraulic cylinder design problems.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Papalambros PY, Wilde DJ (2000) Principles of optimal design. Cambridge University Press
Nath G, Gero JS (2004) Learning while designing. AIEDAM 18 (4): 315–341
Gelsey A, Schwabacher M, Smith D (1998) Using modeling knowledge to guide design space search. Artificial Intelligence 101: 35–62
Suwa M, Gero JS, Purcell T (2000) Unexpected discoveries and s-inventions of design requirements: important vehicles for a design process. Design Studies 21(6): 539–567
Moss J, Cagan J, Kotovsky K (2004) Learning from design experience in an agent-based system. Research in Engineering Design 15: 77–92
Strang G (2003) Introduction to linear algebra. Wellesley-Cambridge Press
Kalman D (1996) A singularly valuable decomposition: the SVD of a matrix. The College Mathematics Journal 27 (1): 2–23
Balachandran M, Gero JS (1987) A knowledge based approach to mathematical design modeling and optimization. Engineering Optimization 12(2): 91–115
Mackenzie CA, Gero JS (1987) Learning design rules from decisions and performances. Artificial Intelligence in Engineering 2(1): 2–10
Schwabacher M, Ellman T, Hirsh H (1998) Learning to set up numerical optimizations of engineering designs. AIEDAM 12: 173–192
Ellman T, Keane J, Banerjee A, Armhold G (1998) A transformation system for interactive reformulation of design optimization strategies. Research in Engineering Design 10(1): 30–61
Campbell MI, Cagan J, Kotovsky K (2003) The A-design approach to managing automated design synthesis. Research in Engineering Design 14: 12–24
Landauer T K, Dumais S T (1997) A solution to Plato's problem: The latent semantic snalysis theory of acquisition, induction and representation of knowledge. Psychological Review, 104(2): 211 – 240
Dong A, Agogino AM: (1997) Text analysis for constructing design representations. Artificial Intelligence in Engineering, 11 (2): 65–75
Hill A, Song S, Dong A, Agogino A (2001) Identifying shared understanding in design teams using document analysis. 13th International Conference on Design Theory and Methodology, DETC2001/ DTM-21713, ASME Press, Chicago, IL
Moss J, Kotovsky K, Cagan J (2004) Cognitive investigations into knowledge representation in engineering design. In JS Gero (ed), Design Computing and Cognition '04, Kluwer: 97–116
Michelena N, Agogino A (1988) Multiobjective hydraulic cylinder design, Journal of Mechanisms. Transmissions and Automation in Design 110: 81–87
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2008 Springer Science+Business Media B.V
About this paper
Cite this paper
Sarkar, S., Dong, A., Gero, J.S. (2008). Learning Symbolic Formulations in Design Optimization. In: Gero, J.S., Goel, A.K. (eds) Design Computing and Cognition '08. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8728-8_28
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8728-8_28
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-8727-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-8728-8
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)