Skip to main content

Novices' Satisfactory Design, Some implications for Performance and Satisficing in Character Design

  • Conference paper
Design Computing and Cognition '08
  • 1482 Accesses

Researches indicate that problem decomposition strategy and visual analogy are helpful for novices to improve their design quality. However, whether novices could attain satisficing level or evaluate designs critically basing on these strategies are unknown. Hence, we try to uncover this through a character design task. Comparing novices' self-assessment with the experts' judgement, the results suggest novices achieve better performance with analogy and explicit index requirements in design solution. Nevertheless, index requirements are not effective for novices to self-evaluate critically. Although there is satisficing level gap between novices and experts, their evaluations of the design still maintain a positive correlation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Simon HA (1973) The structure of ill structured problems. Artificial Intelligence 4(3-4):181–201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ho C-H (2001) Some phenomena of problem decomposition strategy for design thinking: differences between novices and experts. Design Studies 22(1): 27–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ball LJ, Ormerod TC, Morley NJ (2004) Spontaneous analogising in engineering design: a comparative analysis of experts and novices. Design Studies 25(5): 495–508

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Brand-Gruwel S, Wopereis I, Vermetten Y (2005) Information problem solving by experts and novices: analysis of a complex cognitive skill. Computers in Human Behavior 21(3): 487–508

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Chen S-C (2001) Analysis of the use of computer media by expert and novice designers. International Journal of Design Computing 2000–2001(3): 1–10

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cross N (2004) Expertise in design: an overview. Design Studies 25(5): 427– 441

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Christiaans H, Dorst C (1992) Cognitive models in industrial design engineering: a protocol study. Paper presented at the International Conference on Design Theory and Methodology

    Google Scholar 

  8. Lloyd P, Scott P (1994) Discovering the design problem. Design Studies 15(2): 125–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Casakin H, Goldschmidt G (1999) Expertise and the use of visual analogy: implications for design education. Design Studies 20(2): 153–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Goldschmidt G (2001) Visual analogy--a strategy for design reasoning and learning. In C. Eastman, M. McCracken & W. Newstetter (eds), Design Knowing and Learning: Cognition in Design Education, Elsevier Science, Oxford: 199–219

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Heylighen A, Verstijnen IM (2003) Close encounters of the architectural kind. Design Studies 24(4): 313–326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Beiman N (2007) Prepare to board! Creating story and characters for animation features and shorts. Focal Press, St. Louis

    Google Scholar 

  13. Simon HA (1996) The sciences of the artificial, 3rd ed. MIT Press, MA

    Google Scholar 

  14. Jansson DG, Smith SM (1991) Design fixation. Design Studies 12(1): 3–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Purcell AT, Gero JS (1996) Design and other types of fixation. Design Studies 17(4): 363–383

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Guindon R (1990) Knowledge exploited by experts during software system design. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies 33(3): 279–304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. McCracken M, Newstetter W, Chastine J (1999) Misconceptions of designing: a descriptive study. Paper presented at the ACM SIGCSE Bulletin

    Google Scholar 

  18. Verstijnen IM, van Leeuwen C, Goldschmidt G, Hamel R, Hennessey JM (1998) Creative discovery in imagery and perception: combining is relatively easy, restructuring takes a sketch. Acta Psychologica 99(2): 177–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Güth W (2007) Satisficing in portfolio selection—Theoretical aspects and experimental tests. Journal of Socio-Economics 36(4): 505–522

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Simon HA (1955) A behavioral model of rational choice. Quarterly Journal of Economics 69: 99–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Byron M (2005) Simon's revenge: or, incommensurability and satisficing. Analysis 65(4): 311–315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Christiaans H, Venselaar K (2005) Creativity in design engineering and the role of knowledge: modelling the expert. International Journal of Technology and Design Education 15(3): 217–236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Bancroft T (2006) Creating characters with personality. Watson-Guptill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  24. Hamm J (1986) Cartooning the head and figure. Perigee Trade, New York

    Google Scholar 

  25. Gentner D (1983) Structure-mapping: A theoretical framework for analogy. Cognitive Science 7(2): 155–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Akin O, Akin C (1996) Frames of reference in architectural design: analysing the hyperacclamation (A-h-a-!). Design Studies 17(4): 341–361

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer Science+Business Media B.V

About this paper

Cite this paper

Mou, TY., Ho, CH. (2008). Novices' Satisfactory Design, Some implications for Performance and Satisficing in Character Design. In: Gero, J.S., Goel, A.K. (eds) Design Computing and Cognition '08. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8728-8_25

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8728-8_25

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-8727-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-8728-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics