Skip to main content

An Evolutionary Process Model for Design Style Imitation

  • Conference paper
  • 1491 Accesses

In this paper we propose a process model for producing novel constructs that fall within an existing design or artistic style. The process model is based on evolu tionary algorithms. We then present an implementation of the process model that we used in order to imitate the style of the Dutch painter Mondrian. Finally we explain and give the results of a cognitive experiment designed to determine the effectiveness of the process model, and provide a discussion of these results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Mitchell M (1998) An introduction to genetic algorithms. MIT Press, Cam bridge, MA

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Bentley P (ed) (1999) Evolutionary design by computers. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, San Francisco, CA

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Bentley P, Corne DW (eds) (2002) Creative evolutionary systems. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, San Francisco, CA

    Google Scholar 

  4. Todd S, Latham W (1999) The mutation and growth of art by computers. In Bentley P (ed), Evolutionary Design by Computers, Morgan Kaufmann Pub lishers, San Francisco, CA: 221–250

    Google Scholar 

  5. Witbrock T, Neil-Reilly S (1999) Evolving genetic art. In Bentley P (ed), Evolutionary Design by Computers, Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, San Fran cisco, CA: 251–259

    Google Scholar 

  6. Rowbottom A (1999) Evolutionary art and form. In Bentley P (ed), Evolu tionary Design by Computers. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, San Francisco, CA: 261–277

    Google Scholar 

  7. Rooke S (2002) Eons of genetically evolved algorithmic images. In Bentley P, Corne DW (eds), Creative Evolutionary Systems, Morgan Kaufmann Publish ers, San Francisco, CA: 339–365

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Pagliarini L, Lund HH (2002) Art, robots, and evolution as a tool for creativity. In Bentley P, Corne DW (eds), Creative Evolutionary Systems, Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, San Francisco, CA: 367–385

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Hancock PJB, Frowd CD (2002) Evolutionary generation of faces. In Bentley P, Corne DW (eds), Creative Evolutionary Systems, Morgan Kaufmann Pub lishers, San Francisco, CA: 409–424

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Eiben AE, Nabuurs R, Booij I (2002), The Escher evolver: evolution to the people. In Bentley P, Corne DW (eds), Creative Evolutionary Systems, Mor gan Kaufmann Publishers, San Francisco, CA: 425–439

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. McCorduck P (1991) Aaron's code. Freeman

    Google Scholar 

  12. Cha M—Y, Gero JS (1999) Style learning: inductive generalisation of architectural shape patterns. In Brown A, Knight M, Berridge P (eds), Architectural Computing from Turing to 2000, eCAADe, University of Liverpool, UK: 629– 644.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Gero JS, Jupp JR (2003) Feature based qualitative representation of architec tural plans. In A Choutgrajank, E Charoenslip, K Keatruangkamala and W Nakapan (eds), CAADRIA03, Rangsit University, Bangkok: 117–128

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ding L, Gero JS (2001) The emergence of the representation of style in de sign. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 28(5): 707–731

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Boden M (2003) The creative mind: myths and mechanisms. Routledge

    Google Scholar 

  16. Deicher S (1999) Mondrian. Benedikt Taschen Verlag GmbH, Cologne, Ger many

    Google Scholar 

  17. Bax M (2001) Complete Mondrian. Lund Humphries (Ashgate Publishing), Aldershot, UK

    Google Scholar 

  18. Gómez de Silva Garza A, Zamora Lores A (2005) Case-based art. In Muñoz-Ávila H, Ricci F (eds), Case-Based Reasoning Research and Development (ICCBR '05), Springer Verlag, Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany: 237–251

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  19. Gómez de Silva Garza A, Zamora Lores A (2004) A cognitive evaluation of a computer system for generating Mondrian—like artwork. In Gero JS (ed), Design Computing and Cognition '04, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, Netherlands: 79–96

    Google Scholar 

  20. Gero JS (1990) Design prototypes: a knowledge representation schema for de sign. AI Magazine 11(4): 26–36

    Google Scholar 

  21. Rosch E (1988) Principles of categorization. In Collins AC, Smith EE (eds), Readings in Cognitive Science, Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, San Mateo, CA: 312–322

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer Science+Business Media B.V

About this paper

Cite this paper

Garza, A.G.S., Lores, A.Z. (2008). An Evolutionary Process Model for Design Style Imitation. In: Gero, J.S., Goel, A.K. (eds) Design Computing and Cognition '08. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8728-8_22

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8728-8_22

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-8727-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-8728-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics