Skip to main content

Monitoring Democratic Politics, a Market Economy, and Citizen Well-Being: The South Korea Barometer

  • Chapter
Barometers of Quality of Life Around the Globe

Part of the book series: Social Indicators Research Series ((SINS,volume 33))

  • 733 Accesses

Abstract

South Korea is regarded as the most influential and vigorous new democracy in East Asia. The country has not only transferred power peacefully to an opposition party but has also fully transformed its age-old crony capitalism into a competitive and transparent market economy. Yet the question remains: How much progress has Korea really made in democratizing its authoritarian institutions and its underlying cultural values that for nearly three decades supported the military dictatorships that ruled the country? To what extent has the country succeeded in restructuring its crony capitalism? How have these political and economic changes affected the quality of life that ordinary Koreans experience in the private and public spheres of their lives? This study addresses these questions by analyzing the Korea Democracy Barometer surveys conducted over the period of 1997–2004. The results of this analysis reveal that Korea has become a market democracy but its people do not experience any significant improvements in the quality of their lives.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Auh, Soo Young (1997), Value Change, Life, and Politics: Korea, Japan, the United States, and Mexico in Comparison (in Korean), Seoul: Ewha Woman’s University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barker, Ernest (ed. & trns.) (1962), The Politics of Aristotle, New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bratton, Michael and Robert Mattes (2001a), “Africans’ Surprising Universalism,” Journal of Democracy 12: 107–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bratton, Michael and Robert Matter (2001b), “Support for Democracy in Africa: Intrinsic or Instrumental?” British Journal of Political Science 31: 447–474.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bratton, Michael, Robert Mattes, E. Gyimah-Boadi (2005), Public Opinion,Democracy, and Market Reform in Africa. New York: Cambridge UniversityPress.

    Google Scholar 

  • Camp, Roderic Ai. (ed.) (2001), Citizen Views of Democracy in Latin America,Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Choi, Jang Jip (2005), Democracy After Democratization: The Korean Case. Seoul: Humanitas Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Choo, Jaewoo (2002), “New President for New Korea,” Asia Times (December 24).

    Google Scholar 

  • Chu,Yun-han, Larry Diamond, and Doh Chull Shin (2001), “Halting Progress in Korea and Taiwan,” Journal of Democracy 12: 122–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dahl, Robert A. (1992), “The Problems of Civic Competence,” Journal of Democracy 3: 45–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dalton, Russell (1999), “Political Support in Advanced Industrial Democracies,” in Pippa Norris (ed.) Critical Citizens, New York: Oxford University Press, 57–77.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Di Palman, Giuseppe (1990), To Craft Democracies, Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, Larry (1999), Developing Democracy – Toward Consolidation. Baltimore. Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, Larry and Byung-Kook Kim, eds., (2000), Consolidating Democracy in South Korea. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dong-A Ilbo (2003), “Public Opinion Survey: Survey on What the People experience,” Dong-A Ibo (February 24).

    Google Scholar 

  • Duch, Raymond (1999), “Economic Chaos and the Fragility of Democratic Transition in Former Communist Regimes,” Journal of Politics, 57 (1995): 121–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuchs, Dieter (1999), “The Democratic Culture of Unified Germany,” in Pippa Norris (ed.), Critical Citizens: Global Support for Democratic Governance. New York:Oxford University Press, 1999, 57–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuchs, Dieter, Giovanna Guidorossi, and Palle Svensson (1995), “Support for the Democratic System,” in Hans-Dieter Klingemann and Dieter Fuchs eds., Citizens and the State, New York: Oxford University Press, 323–353.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, James (1996), “A Mile Wide but an Inch Deep (?): the Structure of Democratic Commitments in the Former USSR,” American Journal of Political Science 40 (1996): 396–420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huntington, Samuel P. (1991), The Third Wave: Democratization in the Late Twentieth Century, Norman, OK: University of Oklahoma Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Im, Hyug Baeg (2004). “Faltering Democratic Consolidation in South Korea: Democracy at the end of the ‘Three Kims’ Era,” Democratization 11(5): 179–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inglehart, Ronald and Christian Welzel (2005), Modernization, Cultural Change, and Democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joong-Ang Ilbo (2003), “Poll Shows Koreans are Shifting to the Left,” Joong Ang Ilbo (February 11).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kihl, Young W. (2005), Transforming Korean Politics: Democracy, Reform, and Culture. New York: M. E. Sharpe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, Dae Jung (1999), Djnomics: A New Foundation for the Korean Economy, Seoul: Ministry of Finance and Economy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lagos, Marta (1997), “Latin America’s Smiling Mask,” Journal of Democracy 8: 125–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lagos, Marta (2001), “Between Stability and Crisis in Latin America,” Journal of Democracy 12: 137–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linz, Juan and Alfred Stepan (1996), Problems of Democratic Transition and Consolidation, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mattes, Robert and Doh Chull Shin (2005), “The Democratic Impact of Cultural Values in Africa and Asia,” The University of Cape Town Center for Social Science Research Working Paper No. 128.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonough, Peter, Samuel Barnes, and Antonio Lopez Pina (1998), The Cultural Dynamics of Democratization in Spain. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mueller. J. (1999), Capitalism and Ralph’s Pretty Good Grocery. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • McFaul, Michael (2002), “The Fourth Wave of Democracy and Dictatorship,” World Politics 54: 212–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mishler, William and Richard Rose (1996), “Trajectories of Fear and Hope: Support for Democracy in Post-Communist Europe,” Comparative Political Studies 28: 553–581.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montero, Jose Ramon (1993), “Revisiting Democratic Success: Legitimacy and the Meaning of Democracy in Spain,” in Richard Gunther, (ed.), Politics, Society, and Democracy: The Case of Spain. Boulder, CO: Westview.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norris, Pippa (ed.) (1999), Critical Citizens: Global Support for Democratic Governance, New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pharr, Susan and Robert Putnam (2000), Disaffected Democracies, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, Richard (1998), New Democracies Barometer IV. Studies in Public Policy No. 306, Glasgow: Center for the Study of Public Policy, University of Strathclyde.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, Richard (2000), New Russia Baromerter IV. Studies in Public Policy No. 330 Glasgow: Center for the Study of Public Policy, University of Strathclyde.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, Richard, William Mishler, and Christian Haepfer (1998), Democracy and Its Alternatives, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, Richard and Doh Chull Shin (2001), “Democratization Backwards,” in British Journal of Political Science 31: 331–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sachs, Jeffrey D., Aaron Tornell, and Andres Velasco (1996), “Financial Crisis in Emerging Markets: The Lessons from 1995,” Brookings Papers on Economic Activity 1: 147–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shin, Doh Chull (1994), “On the Third Wave of Democratization: A Synthesis and Evaluation of Recent Theory and Research,” World Politics 47: 135–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shin, Doh Chull (1999), Mass Politics and Culture in Democratizing Korea, New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shin, Doh Chull (2001), “Democratic Consolidation in Korea,” Japanese Journal of Political Science 2: 177–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shin, Doh Chull (2007), “Democratization: Perspectives from Global Citizenries,” in Russell J. Dalton and Hans-Dieter Klingemann, eds., The Oxford Handbook of Political Behavior. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 259–282.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shin, Doh Chull, Chong-Min Park, Ah Ran Hwang, Hyun Woo Lee, and Jiho Jang (2003), “The Democratization of Mass Political Orientations in South Korea,” International Journal of Public Opinion Research 15(3): 265–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shin, Doh Chull, Chong-Min Park, and Jiho Jang (2005), “Assessing the Shifting Qualities of Democratic Citizenship: The Case of South Korea,” Democratization 12: 202–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shin, Doh Chull and Richard Rose (1999), 1999 New Korea Barometer Survey. Studies in Public Policy No. 327, Glasgow: Center for the Study of Public Policy, University of Strathclyde.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shin, Doh Chull, Conrad P. Rutkowski, and Chong-Min Park (eds.) (2003b), The Quality of Life in Korea: Comparative and Dynamic Perspectives, Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shin, Doh Chull and Huoyan Shyu (1997), “Political Ambivalence in South Korea and Taiwan,” Journal of Democracy 8: 109–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shin, Doh Chull and Jason Wells (2005), “Has Democracy Become the Only Game in Town? Testing the Notion of Democratic Consolidation in East Asia,” Journal of Democracy 16(2): 88–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strange, Susan (1996), The Retreat of the State, New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, John (1993), “Democracy and the ‘Washington Consensus’,” World Development 21: 92–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Shin, D.C. (2008). Monitoring Democratic Politics, a Market Economy, and Citizen Well-Being: The South Korea Barometer. In: Møller, V., Huschka, D., Michalos, A.C. (eds) Barometers of Quality of Life Around the Globe. Social Indicators Research Series, vol 33. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8686-1_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics