Skip to main content

Investigating the Relationship Between Complex Systematic Concepts

  • Chapter
Intelligent Engineering Systems and Computational Cybernetics

When a user or a designer tries to describe a system or a service provided by that system, then he/she faces some confusion in choosing the right qualitative and/or quantitative performance concepts. In fact, many concepts are used by many research and study groups in different ways; yet these same concepts are inconsistently used. Therefore, these qualitative/quantitative characteristic keep growing without limits and need to be clarified. This paper provides clear insights to the general problem of understanding these concepts and their relationship by integrating them into a one structure. It lays the foundation for achieving a unified design model for these characteristics, which will formulate the basic issues to develop unified quantitative approaches, tools, or evaluation methods. The expected outcomes would benefit many different entities in enhancing the design or optimizing it for achieving better systems and networks.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Kyriakopoulos N, Wilikens M (2001) Dependability and complexity: exploring ideas for studying open systems. Report EUR 19797 EN, JRS, Brussels

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ellison R, Fischer D, Linger R, Lipson H, Longstaff T, Mead N (2001) Survivable network systems: an emerging discipline. Report CMU/SEI-2001-TN-001, Software Engineering Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh

    Google Scholar 

  3. Zolfaghari A, Kaudel F (1994) IEEE Selected Areas in Communication 12:46–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Reznik L (2003) Which models should be applied to measure computer security and information assurance?. In: 12th IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems St. Louis, MO, 2:1243–1248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Orlandi E (1990) Computer security: a consequence of information technology quality. In: IEEE International Carnahan Conference on Crime Countermeasures, Security Technology, IEEE, New York NY, 109–112

    Google Scholar 

  6. Trivedi K (2002) Performance and availability of computers and networks. Course materials, Duke University, Durham, NC

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kyamakya K, Jobmann K, Meincke M (2000) Security and survivability of distributed systems: an overview. In: 21st Century Military Commissions Conference, Los Angeles, CA, 1:449–454

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kyriakopoulos N, Wilikens M (2000) Dependability of complex open systems: a unifying concept for understanding internet-related issues. In: 3rd Information Survivability Workshop, Boston, MA

    Google Scholar 

  9. Perkins T, Peterson R (2003) Cross Talk Jour of Defense Software Engineering 16:9–12

    Google Scholar 

  10. McCabe J (1998) Practical Computer Network Analysis and Design. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco, CA

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Jonsson E (1998) An integrated framework for security and dependability. In: 1998 New Security Paradigm Workshop, Charlottesville, VA

    Google Scholar 

  12. Pradhan D (1996) Fault-Tolerant Computer System Design. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  13. Oliveto F (1997) The Four steps to achieve a reliable design. In: National Aerospace and Electronics Conference, Dayton, OH, 1:446–453

    Google Scholar 

  14. Iyer R (2004) Dependable and Secure Computing 1:2–3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Avizienis A, Laprie J-C, Randell B, Landwehr C (2004) Dependable and Secure Computing 1:11–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Nicol D, Sanders W, Trivedi K (2004) Dependable and Secure Computing 1:48–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Martin-Flatin J-P, Sventek J, Geihs K (2005) Topics in the IFIP/IEEE International Workshop on Self-Managed Systems and Services, Nice, France

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Al-Kuwaiti, M.H., Kyriakopoulos, N. (2009). Investigating the Relationship Between Complex Systematic Concepts. In: Machado, J.A.T., Pátkai, B., Rudas, I.J. (eds) Intelligent Engineering Systems and Computational Cybernetics. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8678-6_27

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8678-6_27

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-8677-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-8678-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics