Skip to main content

Most scheduling problems are NP-hard, the time required to solve the problem optimally increases exponentially with the size of the problem. Scheduling problems have important applications, and a number of heuristic algorithms have been proposed to determine relatively good solutions in polynomial time. Recently, genetic algorithms (GA) are successfully used to solve scheduling problems, as shown by the growing numbers of papers. GA are known as one of the most efficient algorithms for solving scheduling problems. But, when a GA is applied to scheduling problems various crossovers and mutations operators can be applicable. This paper presents and examines a new concept of genetic operators for scheduling problems. A software tool called hybrid and flexible genetic algorithm (HybFlexGA) was developed to examine the performance of various crossover and mutation operators by computing simulations of job scheduling problems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Goldberg DE (1989) Genetic Algorithms in Search, Optimization and Machine Learning. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Thomas ME, Pentico DW (1993) Heuristic Scheduling Systems. John Wiley & Sons, ISBN: 0471578193, New York

    Google Scholar 

  3. Baker KR (1974) Introduction to Sequencing and Scheduling. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  4. Syswerda G (1991) Scheduling optimization using genetic algorithms. In: Davis L (ed) Handbook of Genetic Algorithms, pp 332–349, Van Nostrand Reimhold, New York

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ferrolho A, Crisóstomo M (2005) Genetic Algorithms: Concepts, Techniques and Applications. WSEAS Transactions on Advances in Engineering Education 2:12–19, January, ISSN:1790–1979

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ferrolho A, Crisóstomo M (2005) Scheduling and Control of Flexible Manufacturing Cells Using Genetic Algorithms. WSEAS Transactions on Computers 4:502–510, June, ISSN:1109–2750

    Google Scholar 

  7. Manderick B, Spiessens P (1994) How to select genetic operators for combinatorial optimization problems by analyzing their fitness landscape. In: Zurada JM, Marks II RJ, Robinson CJ (eds) Computational Intelligence Imitating Life, pp 170–181, IEEE Press

    Google Scholar 

  8. Lawer EL (1977) A Pseudopolinomial Algorithm for Sequencing Jobs to Minimize Total Tardiness. Annals of Discrete Mathematics 1977:331–342

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Abdul-Razaq TS, Potts CN, Van Wassenhove LN (1990) A Survey for the Single-Machine Scheduling Total WT Scheduling Problem. Discrete Applied Mathematics 26:235–253

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Potts CN, Van Wassenhove LN (1991) Single Machine Tardiness Sequencing Heuristics. IIE Transactions 23(4)346–354

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Oliver J, Smith D, Holland J (1987) A study of permutation crossover operators on the traveling salesman problem. In: Proceedings of the Second ICGA, pp 224–230, ISBN:960-8457-29-7, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ, USA

    Google Scholar 

  12. Murata T, Ishibuchi H (1994) Performance evaluation of genetic algorithms for flowshop scheduling problems. In: Proceedings of the 1st IEEE International Conference on Evolutionary Computation, pp 812–817

    Google Scholar 

  13. Murata T, Ishibuchi H (1996) Positive and negative combination effects of crossover and mutation operators in sequencing problems. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Evolutionary Computation, pp 170–175, ISBN: 0-7803-2902-3, Nagoya, Japan

    Google Scholar 

  14. Madureira A, Ramos C, Silva S (2001) A GA based scheduling system for dynamic single machine problem. In: Proceedings of the 4th IEEE International Symposium on Assembly and Task Planning Soft Research Park, pp 262–267, ISBN: 0-7803-7004-x, Fukuoka, Japan

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to António Ferrolho .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ferrolho, A., Crisóstomo, M. (2009). Scheduling Jobs with Genetic Algorithms. In: Machado, J.A.T., Pátkai, B., Rudas, I.J. (eds) Intelligent Engineering Systems and Computational Cybernetics. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8678-6_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8678-6_17

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-8677-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-8678-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics