Skip to main content

Declarative vs. Procedural Rules for Religious Controversy: Leibniz’s Rational Approach to~Heresy

  • Chapter
Leibniz: What Kind of Rationalist?

Part of the book series: Logic, Epistemology, and The Unity Of Science ((LEUS,volume 13))

  • 771 Accesses

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Baruzi, J. 1909. Leibniz. Avec de nombreux textes inédits. Paris: Librairie Bloud.

    Google Scholar 

  • Correspondance avec Thomasius. French translation by R. Bodéüs. Paris: Vrin, 1990 [= BO].

    Google Scholar 

  • Systema Theologicum (= Examen religionis christianae; A VI 4 2355–2455). French translation by M. Emery, Exposition de la doctrine de Leibniz sur la religion. Paris, 1819 [= ST].

    Google Scholar 

  • Essais de Théodicée (GP 6 1–487). Edited by A. Farrar, translated by E.M. Huggard; La Salle, IL: Open Court, 1985 [= T].

    Google Scholar 

  • Adams, R.M. 1994. Leibniz. Determinist, Idealist, Theist. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baruzi, J. 1907. Leibniz et l’organisation religieuse de la terre. Paris: Felix Alcan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dascal, M. 1987. Leibniz. Language, Signs and Thought. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dascal, M. 2001. Nihil sine ratione ↔ blandor ratio. In H. Poser (ed.), Nihil sine ratione (VII. Internationaler. Leibniz Kongress), vol. 1. Berlin: Leibniz Gesellschaft, pp. 276–280.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dascal, M. 2005. The balance of reason. In D. Vandervecken (ed.), Logic, Thought and Action. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 27–47.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Grua, G. 1953. Jurisprudence universelle et théodicée chez Leibniz. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pichler, A. 1870. Die Theologie des Leibnizs, aus gedruckten und ungedruckten Quellen mit besonderer Rücksicht auf die kirchlichen Zustände der Gegenwart. München: J. C. Cotta.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newman, J.-H. 1846. An Essay in the Development of Christian Doctrine. London: J. Toovey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riley, P. 1996. Leibniz’s Universal Jurisprudence. Justice as the Charity of the Wise. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Nef, F. (2008). Declarative vs. Procedural Rules for Religious Controversy: Leibniz’s Rational Approach to~Heresy. In: Dascal, M. (eds) Leibniz: What Kind of Rationalist?. Logic, Epistemology, and The Unity Of Science, vol 13. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8668-7_25

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics