Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Contingent Propositions and Leibniz’s Analysis of Juridical Dispositions

  • Chapter
Leibniz: What Kind of Rationalist?

Part of the book series: Logic, Epistemology, and The Unity Of Science ((LEUS,volume 13))

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Aristotle. 1980. Nicomachean Ethics. Tr. W.D. Ross, rev. J.L. Ackrill and J.O. Urmson, Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dear, P. 1987. Jesuit mathematical science and the reconstruction of experience in the early seventeenth century. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 18: 121–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Euclid. 1956. The Thirteen Books of the Elements. Transl. T.L.Heath. New York: Dover.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hintikka, J. and Remes, U. 1974. The Method of Analysis. Its Geometrical Origin and Its General Significance. Dordrecht: Reidel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalinowski, G. 1977. La logique juridique de Leibniz. Conception et contenu. Studia Leibnitiana 9(2): 168–189.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pappus of Alexandria. 1986. Book 7 of the Collection, vol. 1. Ed. A. Jones. (Sources in the History of Mathematics and Physical Sciences, 8). Springer: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Proclus. 1792. The philosophical and mathematical Commentaries of Proclus on the first book of Euclid’s Elements. Tr. Thomas Taylor, with as Translator’s preface his dissertation on the Platonic theory of ideas, and further material. London: Published for the author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schepers, H. 1975. Leibniz’ Disputationen ‘De Conditionibus’: Ansätze zu einer juristischen Aussagenlogik. Akten des II. Internationaler Leibniz-Kongress, vol. 4., Wiesbaden: Steiner: 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tannery, P. 1887. La géométrie grecque. Paris: Gauthier-Villars.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vargas, E. 2001. Analysis and final causes in Leibniz. In H. Poser (ed.), Nihil sine ratione (VII. Internationaler Leibniz-Kongress), vol. 3. Berlin: Leibniz Gesellschaft, pp. 1306–1312.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of La Plata, La Plata, Argentina

    Evelyn Vargas

Authors
  1. Evelyn Vargas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Philosophy, Tel Aviv University, 69978 Tel Aviv, Israel

    Marcelo Dascal (Prof) (Prof)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Vargas, E. (2008). Contingent Propositions and Leibniz’s Analysis of Juridical Dispositions. In: Dascal, M. (eds) Leibniz: What Kind of Rationalist?. Logic, Epistemology, and The Unity Of Science, vol 13. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8668-7_17

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation