This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Chemla, K. 1998. Lazare Carnot et la généralité en géométrie. Variations sur le théorème dit de Menelaus. Revue d’histoire des mathématiques 10: 257–318.
Chemla, K. 2003. Generality above abstraction. The general expressed in terms of the paradigmatic in mathematics in ancient China. Science in Context 16: 413–458.
Garver, E. 2004. For the Sake of Argument: Practical Reasoning, Character, and the Ethics of Belief. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Grosholz, E.R. 1991. Cartesian Method and the Problem of Reduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Grosholz, E.R. 2005. Constructive ambiguity in mathematical reasoning. In C. Cellucci and D. Gillies (eds.), Mathematical Reasoning and Heuristics. London: King’s College Publications, pp. 1–23.
Grosholz, E.R. 2007. Representation and Productive Ambiguity in Mathematics and the Sciences. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Grosholz, E.R. and Yakira, E. 1998. Leibniz’s Science of the Rational (Studia Leibnitiana Sonderheft 26). Stuttgart: Steiner Verlag.
Hintikka, J. 2000. Knowledge of functions in the growth of mathematical knowledge. In E.R. Grosholz and H. Breger (eds.), The Growth of Mathematical Knowledge. Dordrecht: Kluwer, pp. 1–15.
Holmes, O.W. 1984. Codes and the arrangement of the law. In F.R. Kellogg (ed.), The Formative Essays of Justice Holmes: The Making of an American Legal Philosophy. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, pp. 77–89.
Holmes, O.W. 1991. The Common Law. New York: Dover.
Hume, D. 1978. A Treatise of Human Nature. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kemp, C. 2002. Law’s inertia: custom in logic and experience. In A. Sarat and P. Ewick (eds.), Studies in Law, Politics and Society. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science, pp. 135–149.
Levi, E. 1978. An Introduction to Legal Reasoning. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Locke, J. 1959. An Essay Concerning Human Understanding. New York: Dover.
Poincaré, H. 1970. La valeur de la science. Paris: Flammarion.
Robadey, A. 2004. Exploration d’un mode d’écriture de la généralité: l’article de Poincaré sur les lignes géodésiques des surfaces convexes (1905). Revue d’histoire des mathématiques 10: 257–318.
Van Fraassen, B.C. 2000. The Empirical Stance. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2008 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Grosholz, E.R. (2008). Locke, Leibniz, and Hume on Form and Experience. In: Dascal, M. (eds) Leibniz: What Kind of Rationalist?. Logic, Epistemology, and The Unity Of Science, vol 13. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8668-7_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8668-7_11
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-8667-0
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-8668-7
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawPhilosophy and Religion (R0)