Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Philosophy and Medicine ((PHME,volume 101))

While protection of society and individuals is essential, it is also impor tant that legal and regulatory measures applied to nanotechnologies in medicine are rational and do not unnecessarily blunt the proliferation of valuable modalities. In most respects the existing U.S. legal and regulatory structure is flexible and suffi ciently adaptive to accommodate the challenges posed by the use nanotechnology in medicine. In product liability and medical malpractice in particular, currently existing theories and approaches should apply to this revolutionary technology without fundamental revision. The regulatory and approval structure, too, should be mostly serviceable as well. However, the p?tential of biomedical nanotechnologies to have a wide range of post-approval, unintended and un-discoverable conse quences pose a special challenge. As a result, an integrated, national post-approval registry tracking the use of nanotechnologies should be created. Because different nanosubstances used for different purposes may have similar ill-effects, it is impor tant that the registry utilize a centralized repository in which all medical uses of nanotechnologies can be analyzed across uses and technologies and uncover p?tfalls and limitations in the shortest possible period.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • American Law Institute (1965). Restatement of Torts (Second). Philadelphia, PA: American Law Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourne, M. (2005). Product of the Quarter. The Bourne Report Medical Device Quarterly, Fourth Quarter 2005, 1-10.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Ville, K.A. (1998). Medical Malpractice in Twentieth Century United States: The Interaction of Technology, Law and Culture. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care 14, 197-211.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Ville, K.A. (2000). The Ethical and Legal Implications of Handheld Medical Computers. The Journal of Legal Medicine 22, 447–466.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Douthwaite, G. (1992). Jury Instructions on Medical Issues. 4th Edition. Charlottesville, VA: Michie.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eaton, A.T. (1995). The Interface Between Medical Malpractice and Product Liability. Medical Malpractice: Law & Strategy 12, 1–3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engelhardt, H.T. Jr. & Jotterand, F. (2004). The Precautionary Principle: A Dialectic Reconsideration. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 293, 301–312.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • FDA News (March 2006). Bourne Releases Report on BIOMEMS and Nanotechnology. FDA News Device Daily Bulletin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fielder, F.A. & Reynolds, G.H. (1994). Legal Problems of Nanotechnology: An Overview. Southern California Interdisciplinary Law Journal 3, 593–629.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flattum, J. (2006). Nanomedicine. Human Evolution, available at: http://www.human.evolution.org/nano_medicine.php [accessed on Nov 2, 2007].

  • Food and Drug Administration (2006). FDA and Nanotechnology. Administration, available at: http://www/fda/gov/nanotechnology/faqs.htm [accessed Nov 2, 2007].

  • General Accounting Office (GAO) (2006). Drug Safety Improvement Needed in FDA’s Postmarket Decision-Making and Oversight Process. GAO-06-402. Washington, DC: GAO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grady, M.F. (1988). Why Are People Negligent? Technology, Nondurable Precautions, and the Medical Malpractice Explosion. Northwestern Law Review 82, 293–334.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grimes, D.A. (1993). Technological Follies: The Uncritical Acceptance of Medical Innovation. Journal of the American Medical Association 269, 3030–3033.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hursh, R.D. & Bailey, H.J. (1965). American Law of Products Liability. 2nd Edition. Vol. 2. Rochester, NY: Lawyers Co-operative Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iglehart, J.K. (2001). America’s Love Affair with Medical Innovation. Health Affairs 205, 6–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobson, P.D. (2005). Medical Liability and the Culture of Technology. The Pew Charitable Trust, available at: www.medliabilitypa.org [accessed Nov 2, 2007].

  • Kacmar, D.E. (1997). The Impact of Computerized Medical Literature Databases on Medical Malpractice Litigation: A Time for Another Helling v. Carey Wake-Up Call?. Ohio State Law Journal 58, 716–654.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahn, J. (2006). Nano’s Big Future. National Geographic 2096, 98–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lagnese, J. (1993). Applying Product Liability Theories to Physicians. Medical Malpractice: Law & Strategy 1011, 1–3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Masci, D. (2004). Nanotechnology. CQ Researcher 1422, 517–540.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mastroianni, A.C. (2006). Liability, Regulation and Policy in Surgical Innovation: The Cutting Edge of Research and Therapy. Health Matrix 162, 351–442.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Merkle, R.C. (2006). Nanotechnology and Medicine. ALCOR, available at: http://alcor.org/Library/html/NanotechnologyAndMedicine.html [accessed on Nov 2, 2007].

  • Miller, J. (2003). Beyond Biotechnology: FDA Regulation of Nanomedicine. Columbia Science & Technology Law Review 4, 5–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pease, P. (2006). Brush up on your nanotechnology. BBC NEWS June 12, 2006, available at: http://newsvote.bbc.co.uk/mpapps/pagetools/print/news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/4085214.stm [accessed on Nov 2, 2007].

  • Phoenix, C. & Treder, M. (2003). Safe Utilization of Advanced Nanotechnology. CRN: Center for Responsible Nanotechnology, December 2003, available at: http://www.crnano.org/safe.htm [last accessed on Nov 2, 2007].

  • Preiser, S.E., Wecht, C.H., & Preiser, M.L. (1989). Preparing and Winning Medical Negligence Cases. Vol. 1. Charlottesville, VA: Miche.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothman, D.J. (1997). Beginnings Count: The Technological Imperative in American Health Care. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sidawi, D. (2004). Nanotechnology Takes Medical Intervention to a New Level. R & D 2004 4610, 28–29 [accessed on Nov 2, 2007].

    Google Scholar 

  • Till, M.C., Simkin, M.M., & Maebius, S. (2005). Nanotech Meets the FDA: A Success Story About the First Nanoparticulate Drugs Approved by the FDA. Nanotechnology Law & Business 22, 163–167.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer Science + Business Media B.V

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

De Ville, K.A. (2008). Law, Regulation and the Medical Use of Nanotechnology. In: Jotterand, F. (eds) Emerging Conceptual, Ethical and Policy Issues in Bionanotechnology. Philosophy and Medicine, vol 101. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8649-6_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8649-6_11

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-8648-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-8649-6

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics