Quantitative Research Surveys of Fish Stocks

  • Kenneth G. Foote


Fish Stock Acoustic Doppler Current Profiler Autonomous Underwater Vehicle Numerical Density Target Strength 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Aasen O (1958) Estimation of the stock strength of the Norwegian herring. J Cons Int Explor Mer 24:95–110Google Scholar
  2. Akiba T, Kakui Y (2000) Design and testing of an underwater microscope and image processing system for the study of zooplankton distribution. IEEE J Oceanic Eng 25:97–104Google Scholar
  3. Allen B, Stokey R, Austin T, Forrester N, Goldsborough R, Purcell M, von Alt C (1997) REMUS: a small, low cost AUV; system description, field trials and performance results. Proc MTS/IEEE Oceans 1997, pp 994–1000Google Scholar
  4. Andersen LN (2001) The new Simrad EK60 scientific echo sounder system. J Acoust Soc Am 109:2336Google Scholar
  5. Andersen LN, Berg S, Gammelsæter OB, Lunde EB (2006) New scientific multibeam systems (ME70 and MS70) for fishery research applications. J Acoust Soc Am 120:3017Google Scholar
  6. Anthony VC, Waring G (1980) The assessment and management of the Georges Bank herring fishery. Rapp P-v Réun Cons Int Explor Mer 177:72–111Google Scholar
  7. Aoki Y, Sato T, Zeng P, Iida K (1991) Three-dimensional display technique for fish-finder with fan-shaped multiple beams. In: Lee H, Wade G (eds) Acoustical Imaging. Plenum Press, New York, Vol. 18, pp 491–499 Google Scholar
  8. Ashjian CA, Davis CS, Gallager SM, Alatalo P (2001) Distribution of plankton, particles, and hydrographic features across Georges Bank described using the Video Plankton Recorder. Deep-Sea Res II, 48:245–282Google Scholar
  9. Ashjian CA, Davis CS, Gallager SM, Alatalo P (2005) Characterization of the zooplankton community, size composition, and distribution in relation to hydrography in the Japan/East Sea. Deep-Sea Res II 52:1363–1392Google Scholar
  10. Astthorsen OS, Gislason A, Gudmundsdottir A (1994) Distribution, abundance, and length of pelagic juvenile cod in Icelandic waters in relation to environmental conditions. ICES Marine Science Symposia 198:529–541Google Scholar
  11. Astthorsen OS, Gislason A (1995) Long-term changes in zooplankton biomass in Icelandic waters in spring. ICES J Mar Sci 52:657–668Google Scholar
  12. Axelsen BE, Anker-Nilssen T, Fossum P, Kvamme C, Nøttestad L (2001) Pretty patterns but a simple strategy: predator-prey interactions between juvenile herring and Atlantic puffins observed with multibeam sonar. Can J Zool 79:1586–1596Google Scholar
  13. Bailey RS, Simmonds EJ (1990) The use of acoustic surveys in the assessment of the North Sea herring stock and a comparison with other methods. Rapp P-v Réun Cons int Explor Mer 189:9–17Google Scholar
  14. Baumgartner MF (2003) Comparisons of Calanus finmarchicus fifth copepodite abundance estimates from nets and an optical plankton counter. J Plank Res 25:855–868Google Scholar
  15. Benfield MC, Davis CS, Wiebe PH, Gallager SM, Lough RG, Copley NJ (1996) Video plankton recorder estimates of copepod, pteropod and larvacean distributions from a stratified region of Georges Bank with comparative measurements from a MOCNESS sampler. Deep-Sea Res II 43:1925–1945Google Scholar
  16. Benfield MC, Wiebe PH, Stanton TK, Davis CS, Gallager SM, Green CH (1998) Estimating the spatial distribution of zooplankton biomass by combining Video Plankton Recorder and single-frequency acoustic data. Deep-Sea Res II 45:1175–1199Google Scholar
  17. Benfield MC, Lavery AC, Wiebe PH, Greene CH, Stanton TK, Copley NJ (2003a) Distributions of physonect siphonulae in the Gulf of Maine and their potential as important sources of acoustic scattering. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 60:759–772Google Scholar
  18. Benfield MC, Schwehm CJ, Fredericks RG, Squyres G, Keenan SF, Trevorrow MV (2003b) Measurement of zooplankton distributions with a high-resolution digital camera system. In: Strutton P, Seuront L (eds) Handbook of Scaling Methods in Aquatic Ecology: Measurement, Analysis Simulation. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida, pp 17–30Google Scholar
  19. Benoit-Bird K, Au W (2003) Hawaiian spinner dolphins aggregate midwater food resources through cooperative foraging. J Acoust Soc Am 114:2300Google Scholar
  20. Blindheim J (1990) Arctic intermediate water in the Norwegian Sea. Deep-Sea Res 37:1475–1489Google Scholar
  21. Blindheim J (2004) Oceanography and climate. In: Skjoldal HR (ed) The Norwegian Sea Ecosystem. Tapir Academic Press, Trondheim, pp 65–96Google Scholar
  22. Bobber RJ (1970) Underwater electroacoustic measurements. Naval Research Laboratory, Washington, District of ColumbiaGoogle Scholar
  23. Bodholt H, Nes H, Solli H (1989) A new echo-sounder system. Proc Inst Acoust 11(3): 123–130Google Scholar
  24. Bonacito C, Constantini M, Picciulin M, Ferrero EA, Hawkins AD (2002) Passive hydrophone census of Sciaena umbra (Sciaenidae) in the Gulf of Trieste (Northern Adriatic Sea, Italy). Bioacoustics 12:292–294Google Scholar
  25. Broughton EA, Lough RG (2006) A direct comparison of MOCNESS and Video Plankton Recorder zooplankton abundance estimates: possible applications for augmenting net sampling with video systems. Deep-Sea Res II 53:2789–2807Google Scholar
  26. Burd AC, Holford BH (1971) The decline in the abundance of Downs herring larvae. Rapp P-v Réun Cons Int Explor Mer 160:99–100Google Scholar
  27. Burns DR, Queen CB, Sisk H, Mullarkey W, Chivers RC (1989) Rapid and convenient acoustic sea-bed discrimination. Proc Inst Acoust 11(3): 169–178Google Scholar
  28. Burwen D, Maxwell S, Pfisterer C (2004) Investigations into the application of a new sonar system for assessing fish passage in Alaskan rivers. J Acoust Soc Am 115:2547Google Scholar
  29. Caimi FM, Blatt JH, Grossman BG, Smith D, Hooker J, Kocak DM, Gonzalez F (1993) Advanced underwater laser systems for ranging size estimation, and profiling. Mar Technol Soc J 27(1): 31–41Google Scholar
  30. Carrera P, Churnside JH, Boyra G, Marques V, Scalabrin C, Uriarte (2006) Comparison of airborne lidar with echosounders: a case study in the coastal Atlantic waters of southern Europe. ICES J Mar Sci 63:1736–1750Google Scholar
  31. Checkley Jr DM, Ortner PB, Settle LR, Cummings SR (1997) A continuous, underway fish egg sampler. Fish Oceanogr 6:58–73Google Scholar
  32. Checkley Jr DM, Dotson RC, Griffith DA (2000) Continuous, underway sampling of eggs of Northern anchovy (Engraulis mordax) and Pacific sardine (Sardinops sagax) in Spring 1996 and 1997 off Southern and Central California. Deep-Sea Res II 47:1139–1155Google Scholar
  33. Christian K, Richter S (1994) The UNIX operating system. 3rd edn. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  34. Churnside JH, Hunter JR (1996) Laser remote sensing of epipelagic fishes. SPIE 2964:38–53Google Scholar
  35. Churnside JH, Wilson JJ, Tatarskii VV (2001) Airborne lidar for fisheries applications. Opt Eng 40:406–414Google Scholar
  36. Churnside JH, Demer DA, Mahmoudi B (2003) A comparison of lidar and echosounder measurements of fish schools in the Gulf of Mexico. ICES J Mar Sci 60:147–154Google Scholar
  37. Churnside JH, Wilson JJ (2004) Airborne lidar imaging of salmon. Appl Opt 43:1416–1424PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Churnside JH, Thorne RE (2005) Comparison of airborne lidar measurements with 420 kHz echo-sounder measurements of zooplankton. Appl Opt 44:5504–5511PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Clark CW, Ellison WT (1988) Numbers and distributions of bowhead whales, Balaena mysticetus, based on the 1985 acoustic study off Pt. Barrow, Alaska. Rep Int Whal Comm 38:365–370Google Scholar
  40. Clay CS, Medwin H (1977) Acoustical oceanography: principles and applications. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  41. Cochrane NA, Whitman JWE, Belliveau D (1988) Doppler current profilers. Can Tech Rep Fish Aquat Sci, (1641), 89–92Google Scholar
  42. Cochrane NA, Sameoto DD, Belliveau DJ (1994) Temporal variability of euphausiid concentrations in a Nova Scotia shelf basin using a bottom-mounted acoustic Doppler current profiler. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 107:55–66Google Scholar
  43. Cressie NAC (1991) Statistics for spatial data. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  44. Date CJ (1987a) A guide to INGRES. Addison-Wesley, Reading, Massa-chussetsGoogle Scholar
  45. Date CJ (1987b) A guide to SQL standard. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MassachussettsGoogle Scholar
  46. Davis CS, Gallager SM, Berman MS, Haury LR, Strickler JR (1992a) The Video Plankton Recorder (VPR): design and initial results. Arch Hydrobiol Beih Ergeb Limnol 36:67–81Google Scholar
  47. Davis CS, Gallager SM, Solow AR (1992b) Microaggregations of oceanic plankton observed by towed video microscopy. Science 257:230–232Google Scholar
  48. Davis CS, Gallager SM, Marra M, Stewart WK (1996) Rapid visualization of plankton abundance and taxonomic composition using the video plankton recorder. Deep-Sea Res II 43:1947–1970Google Scholar
  49. Davis CS, Hu Q, Gallager SM, Tang X, Ashjian CJ (2004) Real-time observation of taxa-specific plankton distributions: an optical sampling method. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 284:77–96Google Scholar
  50. Davis CS, Thwaites FT, Gallager SM, Hu Q (2005) A three-axis fast-tow digital Video Plankton Recorder for rapid surveys of plankton taxa and hydrography. Limnol Oceangr: Methods 3:59–74Google Scholar
  51. Davis CS, McGillicuddy DJ (2006) Transatlantic abundance of the N2-fixing colonial cyanobacterium Trichodesmium. Science 312:1517–1520PubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Dennett, MR, Caron DA, Michaels AE, Church M, Gallager SM, Davis CS (2002) Video Plankton Recorder reveals high abundance of colonial radiolaria in surface waters of the central north Pacific. J Plankt Res 24:797–805Google Scholar
  53. Diachok O (1999) Effects of absorptivity due to fish on transmission loss in shallow water. J Acoust Soc Am 105:2107–2128Google Scholar
  54. Diachok O (2000) Absorption spectroscopy: a new approach to estimation of biomass. Fish Res 47:231–244Google Scholar
  55. Dragesund O, Jakobsson J (1963) Stock strengths and rates of mortality of the Norwegian spring spawners as indicated by tagging experiments in Icelandic waters. Rapp P-v Réun Cons int Explor Mer 154:83–90Google Scholar
  56. Dragesund O, Haraldsvik S (1968) Norwegian tagging experiments in the north-eastern North Sea and Skagerak, 1964 and 1965. Fiskeridirektoratets Skrifter Serie Havundersøkelser 14:98–120Google Scholar
  57. Dybedal J (1993) TOPAS: parametric end-fire array used in offshore applications. In: Hobaek H (ed) Advances in Nonlinear Acoustics. World Scientific, Singapore, pp 264–275Google Scholar
  58. Ehrenberg JE (1974) Two applications for a dual-beam transducer in hydroacoustic fish assessment systems. Proc IEEE Conf Eng Ocean Environ 1:152–154Google Scholar
  59. Ehrenberg JE (1979) A comparative analysis of in situ methods for directly measuring the acoustic target strength of indivudual fish. IEEE J Oceanic Eng 4:141–152Google Scholar
  60. Ellertsen B, Fossum P, Solemdal P, Sundby S (1989) Relations between temperature and survival of eggs and first feeding larvae of the Arcto-Norwegian cod (Gadus morhua L.). Rapp P-v Réun Cons Int Explor Mer 191:209–210Google Scholar
  61. Engås A, Godø OR (1986) Influence of trawl geometry and vertical distribution of fish on sampling with bottom trawl. J Northw Atl Fish Sci 7:35–42Google Scholar
  62. Engås A, Godø OR (1989a) The effect of different sweep lengths on the length composition of bottom-sampling trawl catches. J Cons Int Explor Mer 45:263–268Google Scholar
  63. Engås A, Godø OR (1989b) Escape of fish under the fishing line of a Norwegian sampling trawl and its influence on survey results. J Cons Int Explor Mer 45:269–276Google Scholar
  64. Faran Jr JJ (1951) Sound scattering by solid cylinders and spheres. J Acoust Soc Am 23:405–418Google Scholar
  65. Fish MP (1964) Biological sources of sustained ambient sea noise. In: Tavolga WN (ed) Marine Bio-Acoustics. Pergamon Press, Oxford, pp 175–194Google Scholar
  66. Fish JP, Carr HA (1990) Sound underwater images, a guide to the generation and interpretation of side scan sonar data. 2nd edn. Lower Cape Publishing, OrleansGoogle Scholar
  67. Fish JP, Carr HA (2001) Sound reflections, advanced applications of side scan sonar. Lower Cape Publishing, OrleansGoogle Scholar
  68. Flagg CN, Smith SL (1989) On the use of the acoustic Doppler current profiler to measure zooplankton abundance. Deep-Sea Res 36:455–474Google Scholar
  69. Folds DL, Hanlin J (1975) Focusing properties of a solid four-element ultrasonic lens. J Acoust Soc Am 58:72–77Google Scholar
  70. Foote KG (1982) Optimizing copper spheres for precision calibration of hydroacoustic equipment. J Acoust Soc Am 71:742–747Google Scholar
  71. Foote KG (1983) Maintaining precision calibrations with optimal copper spheres. J Acoust Soc Am 73:1054–1063Google Scholar
  72. Foote KG (1990) Correcting acoustic measurements of scatterer density for extinction. J Acoust Soc Am 88:1543–1546Google Scholar
  73. Foote KG (1991) Acoustic sampling volume. J Acoust Soc Am 90:959–964Google Scholar
  74. Foote KG (1993) Application of acoustics in fisheries, with particular reference to signal processing. In: Moura JMF, Lourtie IMG (eds) Acoustic Signal Processing for Ocean Exploration. North-Holland, Dordrecht, pp 381–390Google Scholar
  75. Foote KG (1999) Extinction cross section of Norwegian spring-spawning herring. ICES J Mar Sci 56:606–612Google Scholar
  76. Foote KG (2000) Standard-target calibration of broadband sonars. J Acoust Soc Am 108:2484Google Scholar
  77. Foote KG (2006) Optimizing two targets for calibrating a broadband multibeam sonar. Proc MTS/IEEE Oceans 2006, electronic doc 060401-09, 4 ppGoogle Scholar
  78. Foote KG, Aglen A, Nakken O (1986) Measurement of fish target strength with a split-beam echo sounder. J Acoust Soc Am 80:612–621Google Scholar
  79. Foote KG, Knudsen HP, Vestnes G, MacLennan DN, Simmonds EJ (1987) Calibration of acoustic instruments for fish density estimation: a practical guide. ICES Coop Res Rep 144:1–69Google Scholar
  80. Foote KG, Knudsen HP, Korneliussen JR, Nordbø PE, Røang K (1991) Postprocessing system for echo sounder data. J Acoust Soc Am 90:38–47Google Scholar
  81. Foote KG, Ona E, Toresen R (1992) Determining the extinction cross section of aggregating fish. J Acoust Soc Am 91:1983–1989Google Scholar
  82. Foote KG, Stefánsson G (1993) Definition of the problem of estimating fish abundance over an area from acoustic line-transect measurements of density. ICES J Mar Sci 50:369–381Google Scholar
  83. Foote KG, Atkins PR, Bongiovanni C, Francis DTI, Eriksen PK, Larsen M, Mortensen T (1999) Measuring the frequency response function of a seven-octave-bandwidth echo sounder. Proc Inst Acoust 21(1): 88–95Google Scholar
  84. Foote KG, Stanton TK (2000) Acoustical methods. In: Harris RP, Wiebe PH, Lenz J, Skjoldal HR, Huntley M (eds) ICES Zooplankton Methodology Manual. Academic Press, London, pp 223–258Google Scholar
  85. Foote KG, Atkins PR, Francis DTI, Knutsen T (2005a) Measuring echo spectra of marine organisms over a wide bandwidth. In: Papadakis JS, Bjørnø L (eds) Proc Int Conf Underwater Acoustic Measurements: Technologies and Results. Heraklion, Crete, Greece, 28 June–1 July 2005, pp 501–508Google Scholar
  86. Foote KG, Chu D, Hammar TR, Baldwin KC, Mayer LA, Hufnagle Jr LC, Jech JM (2005b) Protocols for calibrating multibeam sonar. J Acoust Soc Am 117:2013–2027Google Scholar
  87. Foote KG, Hanlon RT, Iampietro PJ, Kvitek RG (2006) Acoustic detection and quantification of benthic egg beds of the squid Loligo opalescens in Monterey Bay, California. J Acoust Soc Am 119:844–856PubMedGoogle Scholar
  88. Foote KG, Francis DTI, Atkins PR (2007) Calibration sphere for low-frequency parametric sonars. J Acoust Soc Am 121:1482–1490PubMedGoogle Scholar
  89. Fossum P, Moksness E (1993) A study of spring- and autumn-spawned herring (Clupea harengus L.) larvae in the Norwegian Coastal Current during spring 1990. Fish Oceanogr 2:73–81Google Scholar
  90. Fréon P, Misund OA (1999) Dynamics of pelagic fish distribution and behaviour: effects on fisheries and stock assessment. Fishing News Books, Blackwell Science, Osney Mead, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  91. Fucile PD (2002) An expendable bioluminescence measuring bathy-photometer. Proc MTS/IEEE Oceans 2002, pp 1716–1721Google Scholar
  92. Furusawa M (1991) Designing quantitative echo sounders. J Acoust Soc Am 90:26–36Google Scholar
  93. Furusawa M, Takao Y, Sawada K, Odubo T, Yamatani K (1993) Versatile echo sounding system using dual beam. Nippon Suisan Gakkaishi 59:967–980Google Scholar
  94. Gallager SM, Bidwell JP, Kuzirian AM (1989) Strontium is required in artificial seawater for embryonic shell formation in two species of bivalve molluscs. In: Crick RE (ed) Origin, Evolution, and Modern Aspects of Biomineralization in Plants and Animals. Plenum Press, New York, pp 349–366Google Scholar
  95. Gallager SM, Davis CS, Epstein AW, Solow A, Beardsley RC (1996) High-resolution observations of plankton spatial distributions correlated with hydrography in the Great South Channel, Georges Bank. Deep-Sea Res II 43:1627–1663Google Scholar
  96. Gallienne CP, Robins DB (1998) Trans-oceanic characterization of zooplankton community size structure using an optical plankton counter. Fish Oceanogr 7:147–158Google Scholar
  97. Gerlotto F, Stéquert B (1983) Une méthode de simulation pour étudier la disribution des densités en poissons: application à deux cas réels. FAO Fish Rep 300:278–292Google Scholar
  98. Gerlotto F, Soria M, Fréon P (1999) From 2D to 3D: the use of multi-beam sonar for a new approach in fisheries acoustics. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 56:6–12Google Scholar
  99. Godø OR (1994) Factors affecting the reliability of groundfish abundance estimates from bottom trawl surveys. In: Fernö A, Olsen S (eds) Marine Fish Behaviour in Capture and Abundance Estimation. Fishing News Books, Oxford, pp 166–199Google Scholar
  100. Godø OR (1998) What can technology offer the future fisheries scientist – possibilities for obtaining better estimates of stock abundance by direct observations. J Northw Atl Fish Sci 23:105–131Google Scholar
  101. Godø OR, Engås A (1989) Swept area variation with depth and its influence on abundance indices of groundfish from trawl surveys. J Northw Atl Fish Sci 9:133–139Google Scholar
  102. Godø OR, Sunnanå K (1992) Size selection during trawl sampling of cod and haddock and its effect on abundance indices at age. Fish Res 13:93–310Google Scholar
  103. Godø OR, Walsh SJ (1992) Escapement of fish during bottom trawl sampling – implications for resource assessment. Fish Res 13:281–292Google Scholar
  104. Godø OR, Wespestad VG (1993) Monitoring changes in abundance of gadoids with varying availability to trawl and acoustic surveys. ICES J Mar Sci 50:39–51Google Scholar
  105. Gorsky G, Aldorf C, Kage M, Picheral M, Garcia Y, Favole J (1992) Vertical distribution of suspended aggregates determined by a new underwater video profiler. Annales de l'Institut oceanographique, Paris, 68:275–280 Google Scholar
  106. Greene CH, Wiebe PH, Burczynski J, Youngbluth MJ (1988) Acoustical detection of high-density krill demersal layers in the submarine canyons off Georges Bank. Science 241:359–361PubMedGoogle Scholar
  107. Greenspan M (1972) Acoustic properties of liquids. In: Gray DE (ed) American Institute of Physics handbook. McGraw-Hill, New York, pp 3-86–3-98Google Scholar
  108. Gunderson DR (1993) Surveys of fisheries resources. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  109. Hafsteinsson MT, Misund OA (1995) Recording the migration behavior of fish schools by multibeam sonar during conventional acoustic surveys. ICES J Mar Sci 52:915–924Google Scholar
  110. Hampton I, Armstrong MJ, Jolly GM, Shelton PA (1990) Assessment of anchovy spawner biomass off South Africa through combined acoustic and egg-production surveys. Rapp P-v Réun Cons Int Explor Mer 189:18–32Google Scholar
  111. Harden Jones FR, Margetts AR, Greer Walker M, Arnold GP (1977) The efficiency of the Granton otter trawl determined by sector-scanning sonar and acoustic transponding tags. Rapp P-v Réun Cons Int Explor Mer 170:45–51Google Scholar
  112. Hardy AC (1926) A new method of plankton research. Nature 118:630Google Scholar
  113. Harris BP, Stokesbury KDE (2006) Shell growth of sea scallops (Placopecten magellanicus) in the southern and northern Great South Channel, USA. ICES J Mar Sci 63:811–821Google Scholar
  114. Haug A, Nakken O (1977) Echo abundance indices of 0-group fish in the Barents Sea, 1965–1972. Rapp P-v Réun Cons Int Explor Mer 170:259–264Google Scholar
  115. Haury LR, Wiebe PH (1982) Fine-scale multi-species aggregations of oceanic zooplankton. Deep-Sea Res 29:915–921Google Scholar
  116. Heessen JJL, Rijnsdorp AD (1989) Investigations on egg production and mortality of cod (Gadus morhua L.) and plaice (Pleuronectes platessa L.) in the southern and eastern North Sea in 1987 and 1988. Rapp P-v Réun Cons Int Explor Mer 191:15–20Google Scholar
  117. Hempel I, Hempel G (1971) An estimate of mortality in eggs of North Sea herring (Clupea harengus L.). Rapp P-v Réun Cons Int Explor Mer 160:24–26Google Scholar
  118. Hempel G, Schnack D (1971) Larval abundance on spawning grounds of Banks and Downs herring. Rapp P-v Réun Cons Int Explor Mer 160:94–98Google Scholar
  119. Herman AW (1988) Simultaneous measurement of zooplankton and light attenuance with a new optical plankton counter. Cont Shelf Res 8:205–221Google Scholar
  120. Herman AW (1992) Design and calibration of a new optical plankton counter capable of sizing small zooplankton. Deep-Sea Res 39:395–415Google Scholar
  121. Herman AW, Sameoto DD, Shunnian C, Mitchell MR, Petrie B, Cochrane N (1991) Sources of zooplankton on the Nova Scotia Shelf and their aggregations within deep-shelf basins. Cont Shelf Res 11:211–238Google Scholar
  122. Herman AW, Cochrane NA, Sameoto DD (1993) Detection and abundance estimation of euphausiids using an optical plankton counter. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 94:165–173Google Scholar
  123. Herman AW, Beanlands B, Phillips EF (2004) The next generation of Optical Plankton Counter: the Laser-OPC. J Plank Res 26:1135–1145Google Scholar
  124. Hewitt RP, Smith PE, Brown JC (1976) Development and use of sonar mapping for pelagic stock assessments in the California current. Fish Bull 74:281–300Google Scholar
  125. Hewitt RP, Demer DA (2000) The use of acoustic sampling to estimate the dispersion and abundance of euphausiids, with an emphasis on Antarctic krill, Euphausia superba. Fish Res 47:215–229Google Scholar
  126. Heywood KJ, Scrope-Howe S, Barton ED (1991) Estimation of zooplankton abundance from shipborne ADCP backscatter. Deep-Sea Res 38:677–691Google Scholar
  127. Hickling R (1962) Analysis of echoes from a solid elastic sphere in water. J Acoust Soc Am 34:1582–1592Google Scholar
  128. Hjellvik V, Godø OR, Tjøstheim D (2004) Decomposing and explaining the variability of bottom trawl survey data from the Barents Sea. Sarsia 89:196–210Google Scholar
  129. Holliday DV (1980) Use of acoustic frequency diversity for marine biological measurements. In: Diemer FP, Vernberg FJ, Mirkes DZ (eds) Advanced Concepts in Ocean Measurements for Marine Biology. University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina, pp 423–460Google Scholar
  130. Holliday DV, Pieper RE (1980) Volume scattering strengths and zooplankton distributions at acoustic frequencies between 0.5 and 3 MHz. J Acoust Soc Amer 67:135–146Google Scholar
  131. Holliday DV, Pieper RE, Kleppel GS (1989) Determination of zooplankton size and distribution with multi-frequency acoustic technology. J Cons Int Explor Mer 46:52–61Google Scholar
  132. Houde ED, Ortner PB, Lubbers III L, Cummings SR (1989) Test of a camera-net system to determine abundance and heterogeneity in anchovy egg distributions. Rapp P-v Réun Cons Int Explor Mer 191:112–118Google Scholar
  133. Hu Q, Davis C (2006) Accurate automatic quantification of taxa-specific plankton abundance using dual classification with correction. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 306:51–61Google Scholar
  134. Hunter JR, Churnside JH (eds) (1995) Airborne fishery assessment technology – a National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration workshop report. SWFSC Administrative Rep No LJ-95-02, Southwest Fisheries Science Center, La Jolla, CaliforniaGoogle Scholar
  135. Hylen A, Korsbrekke K, Nakken O, Ona E (1995) Comparison of the capture efficiency of 0-group fish in pelagic trawls. In: Hylen A (ed) Precision and relevance of pre-recruit studies for fishery management related to fish stocks in the Barents Sea and adjacent waters. Proc 6th Russian-Norwegian Symp, Bergen, 14–17 June 1994, Institute of Marine Research, Bergen, NorwayGoogle Scholar
  136. Jakobsson J (1983) Echo surveying of the Icelandig summer spawning herring 1973–1982. FAO Fish Rep 300:240–248Google Scholar
  137. Jech JM, Foote KG, Chu D, Hufnagle Jr LC (2005) Comparing two 38-kHz scientific echosounders. ICES J Mar Sci 62:1168–1179Google Scholar
  138. Jech JM, Michaels WL (2006) A multifrequency method to classify and evaluate fisheries acoustics data. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 63:2225–2235Google Scholar
  139. Jenkins FA, White HE (1957) Fundamentals of optics. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  140. Johannesson KA, Robles AN (1977) Echo surveys of Peruvian anchoveta. Rapp P-v Réun Cons Int Explor Mer 170:237–244Google Scholar
  141. Johannesson KA, Mitson RB (1983) Fisheries acoustics. A practical manual for aquatic biomass estimation. FAO Fish Tech Pap 240:1–249Google Scholar
  142. Jones R (1976) The use of marking data in fish population analysis. FAO Fish Tech Pap 153:1–42Google Scholar
  143. Kaatz IM (2002) Multiple sound-producing mechanisms in teleost fishes and hypotheses regarding their behavioural significance. Bioacoustics 12:230–233Google Scholar
  144. Kamgar-Parsi B, Johnson B, Folds DL, Belcher EO (1997) High-resolution underwater acoustic imaging with lens-based systems. Int J Imag Syst Tech 8:377–385Google Scholar
  145. Kane J (1993) Variability of zooplankton biomass and dominant species abundance on Georges Bank, 1977–1986. Fish Bull 91:464–474Google Scholar
  146. Kane J (1997) Persistent spatial and temporal abundance patterns for late-stage copepodites of Centropages hamatus (Copepoda: Calanoida) in the U.S. northeast continental shelf ecosystem. Fish Bull 95:85–98Google Scholar
  147. Kasatkina SM (1997) Selectivity of commercial and research trawls in relation to krill. CCAMLR Sci 4:161–169Google Scholar
  148. Kernighan BW, Ritchie DM (1988) The programming language. 2nd edn. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New JerseyGoogle Scholar
  149. Kim K, Neretti N, Intrator N (2005) Mosaicing of acoustic camera images. IEE Proc-Radar Sonar Navig 152:263–270Google Scholar
  150. Knudsen HP (1990) The Bergen Echo Integrator: and introduction. J Cons Int Explor Mer 47:167–174Google Scholar
  151. Korneliussen RJ, Ona E (2002) An operational system for processing and visualizing multi-frequency acoustic data. ICES J Mar Sci 59:293–313Google Scholar
  152. Koslow JA, Kloser RJ, Williams A (1997) Pelagic biomass and community structure over the mid-continental slope off southeastern Australia based upon acoustic and midwater trawl sampling. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 146:21–35Google Scholar
  153. Lawson GL, Wiebe PH, Ashjian CJ, Gallager SM, Davis CS, Warren JD (2004) Acoustically-inferred zooplankton distribution in relation to hydrography west of the Antarctic Peninsula. Deep-Sea Res II 51:2041–2072Google Scholar
  154. Lawson GL, Wiebe PH, Ashjian CJ, Chu D, Stanton TK (2006) Improved parametrization of krill target strength models. J Acoust Soc Am 119:232–242PubMedGoogle Scholar
  155. Leaper R, Gillespie D, Papastavrou V (2000) Results of passive acoustic surveys for odontocetes in the Southern Ocean. J Cetacean Res Manage 2:187–196Google Scholar
  156. Lo NCH, Hunter JR, Churnside JH (2000) Modeling statistical performance of an airborne lidar survey system for anchovy. Fish Bull 98:264–282Google Scholar
  157. Lo NCH, Smith PE, Takahashi M (in press) Egg, larvae and juvenile surveys. In: Jakobsen T, Fogarty M, Megrey MA, Moksness E (eds) Fish Reproductive Biology and its implications for Assessment and Management. Blackwell, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  158. Lobel PS (2002) Diversity of fish spawning sounds and the application of passive acoustic monitoring. Bioacoustics 12:286–289Google Scholar
  159. Lough RG, Bolz GR, Pennington, M, Grosslein MD (1985) Larval abundance and mortality of Atlantic herring (Clupea harengus L.) spawned in the Georges Bank and Nantucket Shoals areas, 1971–1978 seasons, in relation to spawning stock size. J Northw Atl Fish Sci 6:21–35Google Scholar
  160. Luczkovich JJ, Sprague MW (2002) Using passive acoustics to monitor estuarine fish populations. Bioacoustics 12:289–291Google Scholar
  161. Mackenzie KV (1981) Nine-term equation for sound speed in the oceans. J Acoust Soc Am 70:807–812Google Scholar
  162. MacLennan DN (1990) Acoustical measurement of fish abundance. J Acoust Soc Am 87:1–15Google Scholar
  163. Mais KF (1977) Acoustic surveys of northern anchovies in the California Current system, 1966–1972. Rapp P-v Réun Cons int Explor Mer 170:287–295Google Scholar
  164. Makris NC, Ratilal P, Symonds DT, Jagannathan S, Lee S, Nero RW (2006) Fish population and behavior revealed by instantaneous continental shelf-scale imaging. Science 311:660–663PubMedGoogle Scholar
  165. Mann DA, Lobel PS (1995) Passive acoustic detection of sounds produced by the damselfish, Dascyllus albisella (Pomacentridae). Bioacoustics 6:199–213Google Scholar
  166. Mathisen OA, Croker TR, Nunnallee EP (1977) Acoustic estimation of juvenile sockeye salmon. Rapp P-v Réun Cons Int Explor Mer 170:279–286Google Scholar
  167. McClatchie S, Thorne RE, Grimes P, Hanchet S (2000) Ground truth and target identification for fisheries acoustics. Fish Res 47:173–191Google Scholar
  168. Medwin H, Clay CS (1998) Fundamentals of acoustical oceanography. Academic Press, BostonGoogle Scholar
  169. Midttun L, Nakken O (1977) Some results of abundance estimation studies iwth echo integrators. Rapp P-v Réun Cons int Explor Mer 170:253–258Google Scholar
  170. Misund OA (1993) Abundance estimation of fish schools based on a relationship between school area and school biomass. Aquat Liv Resourc 6:235–241Google Scholar
  171. Misund OA, Aglen A (1992) Swimming behaviour of fish schools in the North Sea during acoustic surveying and pelagic trawl sampling. ICES J Mar Sci 49:325–334Google Scholar
  172. Misund OA, Aglen A, Beltestad AK, Dalen J (1992) Relationships between the geometric dimensions and biomass of schools. ICES J Mar Sci 49:305–315Google Scholar
  173. Mitson RB (1983) Acoustic detection and estimation of fish near the sea-bed and surface. FAO Fish Rep 300:27–34Google Scholar
  174. Moffett MB, Konrad WL (1997) Nonlinear sources and receivers. In: Crocker MJ (ed) Encyclopedia of Acoustics. Wiley, New York, Vol. 1, pp 607–617Google Scholar
  175. Moursund RA, Carlson TJ, Peters RD (2003) A fisheries application of a dual-frequency indentification sonar acoustic camera. ICES J Mar Sci 60:678–683Google Scholar
  176. Munk P (1988) Catching large herring larvae: gear applicability and larval distribution. J Cons Int Explor Mer 45:97–104Google Scholar
  177. Munk P, Christensen V (1990) Larval growth and the separation of herring spawning groups in the North Sea. J Fish Biol 37:135–148Google Scholar
  178. Nakashima BS, Winters GH (1984) Selection of external tags for marking Atlantic herring (Clupea harengus harengus). Can J Fish Aquat Sci 41:1341–1348Google Scholar
  179. Nakken O, Hylen A, Ona E (1995) Acoustic estimates of 0-group fish abundance in the Barents Sea and adjacent waters in 1992 and 1993. In: Hylen A (ed) Precision and Relevance of Pre-recruit Studies for Fishery Management Related to Fish Stocks in the Barents Sea and Adjacent Waters. Proc 6th Russian-Norwegian Symp, Bergen, 14–17 June 1994, Institute of Marine Research, Bergen, NorwayGoogle Scholar
  180. Norrbin MF, Davis CS, Gallager SM (1996) Differences in fine-scale structure and composition of zooplankton between mixed and stratified regions of Georges Bank. Deep-Sea Res II 43:1905–1924Google Scholar
  181. Nøttestad L, Axelsen BE (1999) Herring schooling manoeuvres in response to killer whale attacks. Can J Zool 77:1540–1546Google Scholar
  182. Ona E, Godø OR (1990) Fish reaction to trawling noise: the significance for trawl sampling. Rapp P-v Réun Cons Int Explor Mer 189:159–166Google Scholar
  183. Ona E, Dalen J, Knudsen HP, Patel R, Andersen LN, Berg S (2006) First data from sea trials with the new MS70 multibeam sonar. J Acoust Soc Am 120:3017Google Scholar
  184. Orlowski A (1984) Application of multiple echoes energy measurements for evaluation of sea bottom type. Oceanologia 19:61–78Google Scholar
  185. Orlowski A (1989) Application of acoustic methods to correlaøtion of fish density distribution and the type of sea bottom. Proc Inst Acoust 11:179–185Google Scholar
  186. Overholtz WJ, Jech JM, Michaels WL, Jacobson LD (2006) Empirical comparisons of survey designs in acoustic surveys of Gulf of Maine-Georges Bank Atlantic herring. J Northw Atl Fish Sci 36:127–144Google Scholar
  187. Parker NC, Giorgi AE, Heidinger RC, Jester DB Jr, Prince ED, Winans GA (eds) (1990) Fish-Marking Techniques, American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, Maryland, USAGoogle Scholar
  188. Petitgas P (1993) Geostatistics for fish stock assessment: a review and an acoustic application. ICES J Mar Sci 50:285–298Google Scholar
  189. Picheral M, Grisoni J-M, Stemmann L, Gorsky G (1998) Underwater video profiler for the “in situ” study of suspended particulate matter. Proc MTS/IEEE Oceans 1998, pp 171–173Google Scholar
  190. Pilskaln C, Villareal T, Dennett M, Darkangelo-Wood C, Meadows G (2005) High concentrations of marine snow and diatom algal mats in the North Pacific Subtropical Gyre: implications for carbon and nitrogen cycles in the oligotrophic ocean. Deep-Sea Res I 52:2315–2332Google Scholar
  191. Pizarro O, Singh H (2003) Toward large-area mosaicing for underwater scientific applications. IEEE J Ocean Eng 28:651–672Google Scholar
  192. Planque B, Batten SD (2000) Calanus finmarchicus in the North Atlantic: the year of Calanus in the context of interdecadal change. ICES J Mar Sci 57:1528–1535Google Scholar
  193. Purcell M, von Alt C, Allen B, Austin T, Forrester N, Goldsborough R, Stokey R (2000) New capabilities of the REMUS autonomous underwater vehicle. Proc MTS/IEEE Oceans 2000, pp 147–151Google Scholar
  194. Randa K (1984) Abundance and distribution of 0-group Arcto-Norwegian cod and haddock 1965–1982. In: Godø OR, Tilseth S (eds) Reproduction and recruitment of Arctic cod, Proc 1st Russian–Norwegian Symp, Leningrad, 26–30 September 1983, Institute of Marine Research, Bergen, NorwayGoogle Scholar
  195. Reid DG (ed) (2000) Report on echo trace classification. ICES Coop Res Rep 238Google Scholar
  196. Reynolds JR, Highsmith RC, Konar B, Wheat CG, Doudna D (2001) Fisheries and fisheries habitat investigations using undersea technology. Proc MTS/IEEE Oceans 2001, pp 812–820Google Scholar
  197. Ricker WE (1948) Methods of estimating vital statistics of fish populations. Indiana University Publications Science Series 15:1–101Google Scholar
  198. Ricker WE (1975) Computation and interpretation of biological statistics of fish populations. Bull Fish Res Board Can 191:1–382Google Scholar
  199. Rivoirard J (1994) Introduction to disjunctive kriging and non-linear geostatistics. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  200. Rivoirard J, Simmonds J, Foote KG, Fernandes P, Bez N (2000) Geostatistics for estimating fish abundance. Blackwell Science, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  201. Roe HSJ, Griffiths G (1993) Biological information from an Acoustic Doppler Current Profiler. Mar Biol 115:339–346Google Scholar
  202. Roe HSJ, Griffiths G, Hartman M, Crisp N (1996) Variability in biological distributions and hydrography from concurrent Acoustic Doppler Current Profiler and SeaSSoar surveys. ICES J Mar Sci 53:131–138Google Scholar
  203. Roman C, Pizarro O, Eustice R, Singh H (2000) A new autonomous underwater vehicle for imaging research. Proc MTS/IEEE Oceans 2000, pp 153–156Google Scholar
  204. Rountree RA, Gilmore RG, Goudey CA, Hawkins AD, Luczkovich JJ, Mann DA (2006) Listening to fish: applications of passive acoustics to fisheries science. Fisheries 31:433–446Google Scholar
  205. Rusby JSM, Somers ML, Revie J, McCartney BS, Stubbs AR (1973) An experimental survey of a herring fishery by long-range sonar. Mar Biol 22:271–292Google Scholar
  206. Samson S, Hopkins T, Remsen A, Langebrake L, Sutton T, Patten J (2001) A system for high-resolution zooplankton imaging. IEEE J Ocean Eng 26:671–676Google Scholar
  207. Saville A (1971) The distribution and abundance of herring larvae in the northern North Sea, changes in recent years. Rapp P-v Réun Cons Int Explor Mer 160:87–93Google Scholar
  208. Sawada K, Furusawa M (1993) Precision calibration of echo sounder by integration of standard sphere echoes. J Acoust Soc Jap (E) 14:243–249Google Scholar
  209. Scott JS (1982) Selection of bottom type by groundfishes of the Scotian Shelf. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 39:943–947Google Scholar
  210. Seber GAF (1973) The estimation of animal abundance and related parameters. Griffin, LondonGoogle Scholar
  211. Sherman K, Smith WG, Green JR, Cohen EB, Berman MS, Marti KA, Goulet JR (1987) Zooplankton production and the fisheries of the northeast shelf. In: Backus RH (ed) Georges Bank. MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, pp 268–282Google Scholar
  212. Sherman K, Grosslein M, Mountain D, Busch D, O’Reilly J, Theroux R (1996) The Northeast Shelf Ecosystem: an initial perspective. In: Sherman K, Jaworsk NA, Smayda, TJ (eds) The Northeast Shelf Ecosystem: Assessment, Sustainability, and Management. Blackwell Science, Cambridge, Massachusetts, pp 103–126Google Scholar
  213. Sieracki, CK, Seiracki ME, Yentsch CS (1998) An imaging-in-flow system for automated analysis of marine microplankton. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 168:285–296Google Scholar
  214. Simmonds EJ, Williamson NJ, Gerlotto F, Aglen A (1992) Acoustic survey design and analysis prodecure: a comprehensive review of current practice. ICES Coop Res Rep 187:1–127Google Scholar
  215. Singh H, Pizarro O (2004) Advances in large-area mosaicking underwater. IEEE J Ocean Eng 29:872–886Google Scholar
  216. Singh H, Can A, Eustice R, Lerner S, McPhee N, Pizarro O, Roman C (2004a) Seabed AUV offers new platform for high-resolution imaging. Eos 85:289, 294–295Google Scholar
  217. Singh H, Armstrong R, Gilbes F, Eustice R, Roman C, Pizarro O, Torres J (2004b) Imaging coral I: imaging coral habitats with the SeaBED AUV. Subsurf Sens Technol Applic 5:25–42Google Scholar
  218. Squire JL, Krumboltz H (1981) Profiling pelagic fish schools using airborne optical lasers and other remote sensing techniques. Mar Technol Soc J 15:27–30Google Scholar
  219. Soria M, Fréon P, Gerlotto F (1996) Analysis of vessel influence on spatial behaviour of fish schools using a multi-beam sonar and consequences for biomass estimates by echo sounder. ICES J Mar Sci 53:453–458Google Scholar
  220. Sosik, HM, Olson RJ, Neubert MG, Shalapyonok A, Solow AR (2002) Time series observations of a phytoplankton community monitored with a new submersible flow cytometer. Proc Ocean Opt XVI, 12 ppGoogle Scholar
  221. Stevenson DK, Sherman KM, Graham JJ (1989) Abundance and population dynamics of the 1986 year class of herring along the Maine coast. Rapp P-v Réun Cons Int Explor Mer 191:345–350Google Scholar
  222. Stirling I, Calvert W, Cleator H (1983) Underwater vocalizations as a tool for studying the distribution and relative abundance of wintering pinnipeds in the high Arctic. Arctic 36:262–274Google Scholar
  223. Stokesbury KDE (2002) Estimation of sea scallop abundance in closed areas of Georges Bank, USA. Trans Am Fish Soc 131:1081–1092Google Scholar
  224. Stokesbury KDE, Harris BP, Marino II MC, Nogueira JI (2004) Estimation of sea scallop abundance using a video survey in off-shore US waters. J Shellfish Res 23:33–40Google Scholar
  225. Stokesbury KDE, Harris BP (2006) Impact of limited short-term sea scallop fishery on epibenthic community of Georges Bank closed areas. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 307:85–100Google Scholar
  226. Sundby S (1991) Factors affecting the vertical distribution of eggs. ICES Mar Sci Symp 192:33–38Google Scholar
  227. Sundby S, Bjørke H, Soldal AV, Olsen S (1989) Mortality rates during the early life stages and year-class strength of northeast Arctic cod (Gadus morhua L.). Rapp P-v Réun Cons Int Explor Mer 191:351–358Google Scholar
  228. Suthers IM, Frank KT (1989) Inter-annual distributions of larval and pelagic juvenile cod (Gadus morhua) in southwestern Nova Scotia determined with two different gear types. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 46:591–602Google Scholar
  229. Talbot JW (1977) The dispersal of plaice eggs and larvae in the Southern Bight of the North Sea. J Cons Int Explor Mer 37:221–248Google Scholar
  230. Tarifeño E, Andrade Y, Montesinos J (1990) An echo-acoustic method for assessing clam populations on a sandy bottom. Rapp P-v Réun Cons Int Explor Mer 189:95–100Google Scholar
  231. Tarling GA, Matthews JBL, David P, Guerin O, Buchholz F (2001) The swarm dynamics of northern krill (Meganyctiphanes norvegica) and pteropods (Cavolinia inflexa) during vertical migration in the Ligurian Sea observed by an acoustic Doppler current profiler. Deep-Sea Res I 48:1671–1686Google Scholar
  232. Thorne RE (1977) Acoustic assessment of Pacific hake and herring stocks in Puget Sound, Washington and southeastern Alaska. Rapp P-v Réun Cons Int Explor Mer 170:265–278Google Scholar
  233. Thorne RE (1983) Application of hydroacoustic assessment techniques to three lakes with contrasting fish distributions. FAO Fish Rep 00:269–277Google Scholar
  234. Thorne RE, Thomas GL, Foster MB (2003) Application of combined optical and acoustic technologies for fisheries and marine mammal research in Prince William Sound and Kodiak, Alaska. Proc MTS/IEEE Oceans 2003, electronic doc, 5 ppGoogle Scholar
  235. Thwaite FT, Davis CS (2002) Development of a towed, flyable fish for the Video Plankton Recorder. Proc MTS/IEEE Oceans 2002, pp 1730–1736Google Scholar
  236. Tiselius P (1998) An in situ video camera for plankton studies: design and preliminary observations. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 164:293–299Google Scholar
  237. Tollefsen CDS, Zedel L (2003) Evaluation of a Doppler sonar system for fisheries applications. ICES J Mar Sci 60:692–699Google Scholar
  238. Tracey GA, Saade E, Stevens B, Selvitelli P, Scott J (1998) Laser line scan survey of crab habitats in Alaskan waters. J Shellfish Res 17:1483–1486Google Scholar
  239. Traynor JJ, Nelson MO (1985) Methods of the U.S. hydroacoustic (echo integrator-midwater trawl) survey. Int N Pac Fish Commiss Bull 44:30–38Google Scholar
  240. Traynor JJ, Ehrenberg JE (1990) Fish and standard sphere measurements obtained with a dual-beam and split-beam echo-sounding system. Rapp P-v Reun Cons Int Explor Mer 189:325–333Google Scholar
  241. Trenkel V, Mazauric V, Berger L (2006) First results with the new scientific multibeam echo-sounder ME70. J Acoust Soc Am 120:3017Google Scholar
  242. Trevorrow MV (1998) Salmon and herring school detection in shallow waters using sidescan sonars. Fish Res 35:5–14Google Scholar
  243. Trevorrow MV (2001) An evaluation of a steerable sidescan sonar for surveys of near-surface fish. Fish Res 50:221–234Google Scholar
  244. Urick RJ (1983) Principles of underwater sound. 3rd edn. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  245. Wade G, Coelle-Vera A, Schlussler L, Pei SC (1975) Acoustic lenses and low-velocity fluids for improving Bragg-diffraction images. Acoust Hologr 6:345–362Google Scholar
  246. Walsh SJ (1992) Factors influencing distribution of juvenile yellowtail flounder (Limanda ferruginea) on the Grand Bank of Newfoundland. Netherlands J Sea Res 29:193–203Google Scholar
  247. Walsh SJ, Koeller PA, McKone WD (eds) (1993) Proceedings of the international workshop on survey trawl mensuration, Northwest Atlantic Fisheries Centre, St. John's, Newfoundland, March 18–19, 1991. Can Tech Rep Fish Aquat Sci 1911:1–114Google Scholar
  248. Warner AJ, Hayes GC (1994) Sampling by the Continuous Plankton Recorder survey. Prog Oceanogr 34:237–256Google Scholar
  249. Wespestad VG, Megrey BA (1990) Assessment of walleye pollock stocks in the eastern North Pacific Ocean: an integrated analysis using research survey and commercial fisheries data. Rapp P-v Réun Cons Int Explor Mer 189:33–49Google Scholar
  250. Westervelt PJ (1963) Parametric acoustic array. J Acoust Soc Am 35:535–537Google Scholar
  251. Westgård T (1989) Two models of the vertical distribution of pelagic fish eggs in the turbulent upper layer of the ocean. Rapp P-v Réun Cons Int Explor Mer 191:195–200Google Scholar
  252. Weston DE (1967) Sound propagation in the presence of bladder fish. In: Albers VM (ed) Underwater Acoustics. Plenum, New York, pp 55–88Google Scholar
  253. Weston DE (1972) Fisheries significance of the attenuation due to fish. J Cons Int Explor Mer 34:306–308Google Scholar
  254. Weston DE, Horrigan AA, Thomas SJL, Revie J (1969) Studies of sound transmission fluctuations in shallow coastal waters. Phil Trans Roy Soc London 265:567–607Google Scholar
  255. Weston DE, Revie J (1971) Fish echoes on a long range sonar display. J Sound Vib 17:105–112Google Scholar
  256. Wetherall JA (1982) Analysis of double-tagging experiments. Fish Bull 80:687–701Google Scholar
  257. Widder EA, Case JF, Bernstein SA, MacIntyre S, Lowenstine MR, Bowlby MR, Cook DP (1993) A new large volume bioluminescence bathyphotometer with defined turbulence excitation. Deep-Sea Res II 40:607–627Google Scholar
  258. Wiebe PH, Stanton TK, Greene CH, Benfield MC, Sosik HM, Austin T, Warren JD, Hammar T (2002) Biomapper-II: an integrated instrument platform for coupled biological and physical measurements in coastal and oceanic regimes. IEEE J Ocean Eng 27:700–716Google Scholar
  259. Wiebe PH, Benfield MC (2003) From the Hensen net toward four-dimensional biological oceanography. Prog Oceanogr 56:7–136Google Scholar
  260. Woodd-Walker RS, Gallienne CP, Robins DB (2000) A test model for optical plankton counter (OPC) coincidence and a comparison of OPC-derived and conventional measures of plankton abundance. J Plank Res 22:473–483Google Scholar
  261. Young DA (1994) The X window system: programming and applications with Xt. 2nd edn. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New JerseyGoogle Scholar
  262. Zedel L, Knutsen T (2000) Measurement of fish velocity using Doppler sonar. Proc MTS/IEEE Oceans 2000, pp 1951–1956Google Scholar
  263. Zorn HM, Churnside JH, Oliver CW (2000) Laser safety thresholds for cetaceans and pinnepeds. Mar Mamm Sci 16:186–200Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kenneth G. Foote
    • 1
  1. 1.Woods Hole Oceanographic InstitutionWoods HoleUSA

Personalised recommendations