Abstract
Bernard E. Rollin has written several books on animal welfare and our moral obligation to respect it when using animals for research or for food related activities.1 Several themes run through these works. (1) Scientific agnosticism about nonhuman animal mentation is unjustified. (2) There is an emerging social ethics that increasingly sees nonhuman animals as having rights and this ethics can be given philosophical justification based on new discoveries in animal ethology. (3) Nonhuman animals have a telos or “nature” and the freedom to act in accord with this nature is an essential component of an animal’s welfare. (4) The emerging social ethics in the US has not been transferred from a concern about companion animals and animals used in research to farm animals in intensive production systems because the public has not become fully aware of these conditions and how they affect the animals subjected to them. (5) When the public does become aware that current intensive systems have replaced the husbandry systems of extensive agriculture, it will insist on regulations unless the industry begins to self-regulate (this point seems to be addressed largely to the industry). (6) The treatment of food animals in traditional husbandry systems is ethically warranted because of an implicit contract between the farmer and the animals, a contract in which both benefited equally, hence the contract model for animal use. In his earliest work, Animal Rights and Human Morality (1981), Rollin argues that non-human animals have a moral right to have their interests considered and they have a moral right to life. In subsequent works, the right to life is not mentioned. Rollin argues that animals should be admitted to the moral arena because they have needs and interests, and these should not be limited to merely pleasure and pain. What constitutes an animal’s life is its set of genetically encoded needs whose frustration and satisfaction matter to the animal and are experienced not only as pleasure and pain, but frustration, anxiety, malaise, listlessness, boredom, and anger.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Benson, G. J. and B. E. Rollin (eds.) (2004), The Well-Being of Farm Animals. Challenges and Solutions. Oxford: Blackwell.
Farm Animal Welfare Council (1982), Welfare of Poultry. HMSO.
Farm Animal Welfare Council (1984), Report on the Welfare of Livestock (Red Meat Animals) at the Time of Slaughter. HMSO.
Farm Animal Welfare Council (1985), Welfare of Farm Deer. HMSO.
Farm Animal Welfare Council (1986), Welfare of Livestock at Markets. HMSO.
Hemsworth, P. (1998), Human Livestock Interaction: The Stockperson and the Productivity and Welfare of Intensively Farmed Animals. New York: CABI.
Kilgour, R. (1978), “The Application of Animal Behavior and the Humane Care of Farm Animals.” Journal of Animal Science 46: 1478 ff.
Markowitz, H. (1981), Behavorial Enrichment in Zoos. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
Mason, J. W. (1971), “A Re-evaluation of the Concept of ‘Non-specificty’ in Stress Theory.” Journal of Psychiatry Research 8: 323–333.
Nerein, R. M. et al. (1980), “Social Environment as a Factor in Diet-Induced Atherosclerosis. Science 208: 1475–1476.
Patterson, C. (2002), Eternal Treblinka. Our Treatment of Animals and the Holocaust. Lantern Books, New York.
Rollin, B. E. (1981), Animal Rights and Human Morality. Buffalo, NY: Prometheus.
Rollin, B. E. (1995), Farm Animal Welfare. Social, Bioethical, and Research Issues. Ames, IA: Iowa State University Press.
Rollin, B. E. (1998), The Unheeded Cry. Animal Consciousness, Animal Pain, and Science. Ames, IA: Iowa State University Press.
Rollin, B. E. (1999), An Introduction to Veterinary Medical Ethics. Theory and Cases. Ames, IA: University of Iowa Press.
Rollin, B. E. (2004), “The ethical imperative to control pain and suffering in farm animals.” In G. John Benson and Bernard E. Rollin (eds.). The Well-Being of Farm Animals. Challenges and Solutions. Oxford Blackwell, pp. 3–19.
Rollin, B. E. (2005), “Reasonable Partiality and Animal Ethics.” Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 8: 105–121.
Weiss, J. (1972), “Psychological Factors in Stress and Disease.” Scientific American 226(March): 101–113.
Welmsefelder, F. (1993). “The Concept of Animal Boredom and Its Relationship to Stereotyped Behaviour.” In A. B. Lawrence and J. Rushen (eds.), Stereotypic Animal Behaviour: Fundamental and Applications to Welfare. Wallingford, UK: CABI.
Wemelsfelder, F. (1990), “Boredom and Laboratory Animal Welfare.” In B. E. Rollin (ed.), The Experimental Animal in Biomedical Research. Vol. I. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
Wood-Gush, D. G. M. and A. Stolba (1981), “Behavior of Pigs and the Design of a New Housing System.” Applied Animal Ethology 8: 583–585.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2008 Springer Science + Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
(2008). Rollin’s Theory of Animal Welfare and Its Ethical Implications. In: Haynes, R.P. (eds) Animal Welfare. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8619-9_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8619-9_9
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-8787-4
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-8619-9
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawSocial Sciences (R0)