Nordenfelt has authored an interesting and useful book, identifying various theories of human and animal health and welfare (though less has been written about animal health than human health), and suggesting shortcomings of each theory.1 This he does in the first two parts of the book, consisting of 21 relatively short chapters. He puts forth his own view in the third part, consisting of two chapters. There is also an Appendix examining the similarities and differences between his own view and Amartya’s Sen’s theory of functionings and capabilities. In the first two parts of the book, he often compares elements of the views he is examining with his own view, so we get hints of what his own theory is throughout the book.
KeywordsAnimal Welfare Sign Language Environmental Ethic Nonhuman Animal Pleasurable Sensation
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Appleby, M. C. and P. Sandoe (2002), “Philosophical Debate on the Nature of Well-being: Implications for Animal Welfare.” Animal Welfare 11, 283–294.Google Scholar
- Nordenfelt, L. (2006), Animal and Human Health and Welfare. A Comparative Philosophical Analysis. Oxford: CABI.Google Scholar
- Nussbaum, M. C. (2004), “Beyond ‘Compassion and Humanity’: Justice for Nonhuman Animals.” In C. R. Sunstein and M. C. Nussbaum (eds.), Animal Rights. Current Debates and New Directions. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 299–320.Google Scholar
- Sandoe, P. (1996), “Animal and Human Welfare ? Are They the Same Kind of Thing?” Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica Section A, Animal Science. Supplementum 27: 11–15.Google Scholar
- Sapontzis, S. F. (ed.) (2004), Food for Thought. The Debate over Eating Meat. Amherst, NY: Prometheus.Google Scholar
- Sumner, L. W. (1996), Welfare, Happiness, and Ethics. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar