Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Aschheim M, Black EF (2000) Yield point spectra for seismic design and rehabilitation, Earthquake Spectra, 16(2), pp. 317–335.
Applied Technology Council (1985) ATC-13: Earthquake damage evaluation data for California, ATC, Redwood City, California.
Applied Technology Council (1996) ATC-40: Seismic evaluation and retrofit of concrete buildings, ATC, Redwood City, California.
Chopra AK, Goel RK (1999) Capacity-demand-diagram methods for estimating seismic deformation of inelastic structures: SDF systems, PEER-1999/02, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Berkeley, California.
Chryssanthopoulos MK, Dymiotis C, Kappos AJ (2000) Probabilistic evaluation of behaviour factors in EC8-designed R/C frames, Engineering Structures, 22(8), pp. 1028–1041.
Erberik MA, Elnashai AS (2004) Fragility analysis of flat-slab structures, Engineering Structures, 26(7), pp. 937–948.
Fajfar P, Fischinger M (1988) N2 – A method for non-linear seismic analysis of regular structures, In: Proceedings of the 9th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Tokyo-Kyoto, Japan, 5, p. 111.
Federal Emergency Management Agency (1997) FEMA-273: NEHRP guidelines for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings, FEMA, Washington, DC.
Geysken P, Der Kiureghian A, Monteiro P (1993) BUMP: Bayesian updating of model parameters, UBS/SEM-93/06, University of California at Berkeley.
Jeong SH, Elnashai AS (2007) Probabilistic fragility analysis parameterized by fundamental response quantities, Engineering Structures, 29(6).
Kwon OS, Elnashai AS (2005) The effect of material and ground motion uncertainty on the seismic vulnerability curves of RC structures, Engineering Structures, 28(2), pp. 289–303.
Lang K (2002) Seismic vulnerability of existing buildings. IBK Bericht, Bd. 273, Institute of Structural Engineering, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, Zurich, Switzerland.
National Institute of Building Sciences (1995) Development of a standardized earthquake loss estimation methodology, FEMA, Washington DC.
Pinto PE, Giannini R, Franchin P (2004) Seismic reliability analysis of structures, IUSS Press.
Romero S, Rix GJ (2002) Site response in the upper Mississippi embayment, In: Proceedings of the 7th U.S. National Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Boston, MA.
Rossetto T, Elnashai AS (2003) Derivation of vulnerability functions for European-type RC structures based on observational data, Engineering Structures, 25(10), pp. 1241–1263.
Saiidi M, Sozen MA (1981) Simple nonlinear seismic analysis of RC structures, Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, 107(5), pp. 937–953.
Singhal A, Kiremidjian AS (1996) Method for probabilistic evaluation of seismic structural damage, Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, 122(12), pp. 1459–1467.
Shinozuka M, Feng MQ, Kim HK, Kim SH (2000) Nonlinear static procedure for fragility curve development, Journal of Engineering Mechanics, ASCE, 126(12), pp 1287–1295.
Wen YK, Ellingwood BR, Bracci J (2004) Vulnerability function framework for consequence-based engineering, MAE Report 04-04, Mid-America Earthquake Center, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2009 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Elnashai, A., Jeong, SH. (2009). Rapid Probabilistic Assessment of Structural Systems in Earthquake Regions. In: The 1755 Lisbon Earthquake: Revisited. Geotechnical, Geological, and Earthquake Engineering, vol 7. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8609-0_21
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8609-0_21
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-8608-3
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-8609-0
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)