Skip to main content

Analysis of Numerical Error Reduction in Explicitly Filtered LES Using Two-Point Turbulence Closure

  • Chapter
Quality and Reliability of Large-Eddy Simulations

Part of the book series: Ercoftac Series ((ERCO,volume 12))

Abstract

Numerical errors in large-eddy simulation (LES) are investigated using the eddy-damped quasi-normal Markovian (EDQNM) modeling approach, for finite differences of order 2 to 14, and for optimized differentiation schemes. An EDQNM-LES model is derived to evaluate numerical errors, namely the aliasing and the differentiation errors. The results show that the aliasing errors are negligible whereas the interactions between wavenumbers close to the mesh cut-off wavenumber are responsible for a major part of the differentiation errors. In addition, the accuracy of a LES calculation is seen to be improved when explicit filtering of the higher part of the turbulence spectrum is introduced.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Geurts B (2003) Elements of direct and large-eddy simulation. Edwards, Flourtown

    Google Scholar 

  2. Smagorinsky J (1963) Mon Wea Rev 91:99–163

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. Lesieur M, Métais O (1996) Annu Rev Fluid Mech 28:45–82

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. Pope S (2204) New J Phys 6:1–24

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ghosal S (1996) J Comput Phys 125:187–206

    Article  MATH  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Park N, Mahesh K (2007) J Comput Phys 222:194–216

    Article  MATH  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Comte-Bellot G, Corrsin S (1971) J Fluid Mech 48:273–337

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. Bogey C, Bailly C (2004) J Comput Phys 194:194–214

    Article  MATH  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. Lesieur M (1987) Turbulence in fluids. Kluwer, Dordrecht

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Kraichnan R (1976) J Atmos Sci 33:1521–1536

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. Chollet J-P (1984) Two-point closures as a subgrid-scale modeling tool for large-eddy simulations. In: Durst F, Launder BE (eds) Turbulent Shear Flows IV. Springer, Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  12. Tam C (1995) AIAA J 33:1788–1797

    Article  MATH  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Berland, J., Bogey, C., Bailly, C. (2008). Analysis of Numerical Error Reduction in Explicitly Filtered LES Using Two-Point Turbulence Closure. In: Meyers, J., Geurts, B.J., Sagaut, P. (eds) Quality and Reliability of Large-Eddy Simulations. Ercoftac Series, vol 12. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8578-9_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics