Skip to main content

Political Norms, Markets and Social Capital

  • Chapter
Political Legitimization without Morality?

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Adler, P.S. and Kwon, S.W. (2000): “Social Capital: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly”, in: Lesser, E.E. (eds.): Knowledge and Social Capital: Foundations and Applications, Boston: pp. 89–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banfield, E.C. (1958): The Moral Basis of a Backward Society, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baurmann, M. (1997a): “Liberal Society and Planned Morality?” in: Associations 1, pp. 81–102; reprinted in: Morscher, E. and Neumaier, O. (eds.), (1998): Applied Ethics in a Troubled World, Dordrecht, pp. 203–223.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baurmann, M. (1997b): “Universalisierung und Partikularisierung der Moral. Ein individualistisches Erklörungsmodell” in: Hegselmann, R. and Kliemt, H. (eds.): Moral und Interesse. Zur interdisziplinören Erneuerung der Moralwissenschaften, München, pp. 65–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baurmann, M. (1999): “Solidarity as a Social Norm and as a Constitutional Norm” in: Bayertz, K. (ed.): Solidarity, Dordrecht, pp. 243–272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baurmann, M. (2000a [1996]): Der Markt der Tugend – Recht und Moral in der liberalen Gesellschaft, Tübingen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baurmann, M. (2000b): “Legal Authority as a Social Fact” in: Law & Philosophy 19, pp. 247–262.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baurmann, M. (2002a): “Vertrauen und Anerkennung. Wie weiche Anreize ein Vertrauen in Institutionen fördern können” in: Maurer, A. and Schmid, M. (eds.): Neuer Institutionalismus. Beitröge zur soziologischen Erklörung von Organisation, Moral und Vertrauen, Frankfurt, pp. 107–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baurmann, M. (2002b): The Market of Virtues. Morality and Commitment in a Liberal Society, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baurmann, M. (2003): “Majority Without Morality? Why Democratic Decisions Demand Ethical Principles” in: The Tampere Club (ed.): The Future of Democracy. Essays of the Tampere Club, Tampere, pp. 97–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baurmann, M. (2005): “Korruption, Recht und Moral”, in: Alemann, U. von (ed.): Dimensionen politischer Korruption, Politische Vierteljahresschrift, Sonderheft 35, pp. 164–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baurmann, M. and Lahno, B. (2002): “Vertrauen, Kooperation und groβe Zahlen”, in:Schmalz-Bruns, R. and Zintl, R. (eds.): Politisches Vertrauen, Baden Baden, pp. 191–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braithwaite, V. and Levi, M. (eds.), (1998): Trust and Governance, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brennan, G. (1995): “Economising on Virtue”, in: Constitutional Political Economy 6, pp. 35–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brennan, G. and Lomasky, L. (1993): Democracy and Decision, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brennan, G. and Hamlin, A. (2000): Democratic Devices and Desires, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brennan, G. and Pettit, P. (2004): The Economy of Esteem, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, J.M. and Congleton, R.D. (1998): Politics By Principle, Not Interest, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, J.S. (1987): “Norms as Social Capital”, in: Radnitzky, G. and Bernholz, P. (eds.): Economic Imperialism: The Economic Approach Applied Outside the Field of Economics, New York, pp. 133–155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, J.S. (1988): “Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital”, in: American Journal of Sociology 94, Supplement, pp. 95–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cook, K.S. (ed.), (2001): Trust in Society, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curtis, J.E., Baer, D.E. and Grabb, E.G. (2001): “Nations of Joiners: Explaining Voluntary Association. Membership in Democratic Societies”, in: American Sociological Review 66, pp. 783–805.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dasgupta, P. (2000): “Economic Progress and the Idea of Social Capital”, in: Dasgupta, P. and Serageldin, I. (eds.): Social Capital: A Multifaceted Perspective, Washington, World Bank, pp. 325–424.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dekker, P. and Uslaner, E.M. (eds.), (2001): Social Capital and Participation in Everyday Life, London–New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Etzioni, A. (1993): The Spirit of Community. Rights, Responsibilities, and the Communitarian Agenda, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fukuyama, F. (1995): Trust: The Social Virtues and the Creation of Prosperity, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fukuyama, F. (2000): “Social Capital and Civil Society”, International Monetary Fund Working Paper, WP/00/74, pp. 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gambetta, D. (ed.), (1988): Trust: Making and Breaking Cooperative Relations, Oxford-New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gambetta, D. (1993): The Sicilian Mafia: the Business of Private Protection, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Granovetter, M.S. (1973): “The Strength of Weak Ties”, in: American Journal of Sociology 78, pp. 1360–1380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Granovetter, M.S. (1985): “Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness”, in: American Journal of Sociology 91, pp. 481–510.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hardin, R. (1995): One for All. The Logic of Group Conflict, Princeton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardin, R. (1999): “Do We Want Trust in Government?” in: Warren, M. (ed.): Democracy and Trust, Cambridge, pp. 22–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirschman, A.O. (1977): The Passions and the Interests. Political Arguments for Capitalism before its Triumph, Princeton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lahno, B. (2002): Der Begriff des Vertrauens, Paderborn.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levi, M. (1996): “Social and Unsocial Capital: A Review Essay of Robert Putnam’s ‘Making Democracy Work”’, in: Politics & Society 24, pp. 45–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacIntyre, A. (1981): After Virtue, A Study in Moral Theory, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Misztal, B.A. (1996): Trust in Modern Societies, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newton, K. (1997): “Social Capital and Democracy”, in: American Behavioral Scientist 40, pp. 575–586.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Offe, C. and Fuchs, S. (2001): “Schwund des Sozialkapitals? Der Fall Deutschland”, in: Putnam, R.D. (ed.): Gesellschaft und Gemeinsinn. Sozialkapital im internationalen Vergleich, Gütersloh, pp. 417–514.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom, E. (1990): Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom, E. and Ahn, T.K. (eds.), (2003): Foundations of Social Capital, Cheltenham/Northampton: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom, E. and Ahn, T.K. (eds.): Foundations of Social Capital, Cheltenham/Northampton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paxton, P. (2002): “Social Capital and Democracy: An Interdependend Relationship”, in: American Sociological Review 67, pp. 254–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pettit, P. (1997): Republicanism: A Theory of Freedom and Government, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Portes, A. and Landolt, P. (1996): The Downside of Social Capital, in: The American Prospect 26, pp. 18–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, R.D. (1993): Making Democracy Work. Civic Traditions in Modern Italy, Princeton 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, R.D. (2000): Bowling Alone. The Collapse and Revival of American Community, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, R.D. (ed.), (2001): Gesellschaft und Gemeinsinn. Sozialkapital im internationalenVergleich, Gütersloh.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, R.D. and Goss, K.A. (2001): “Einleitung”, in: Putnam, R.D. (ed.): Gesellschaft und Gemeinsinn. Sozialkapital im internationalen Vergleich, Gütersloh, pp. 15–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stolle, D. (1998): “Bowling Together, Bowling Alone: The Development of Generalized Trust in Voluntary Associations”, in: Political Psychology 19, pp. 497–525.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stolle, D. and Rochon, T.R. (1998): “Are All Associations Alike? Member Diversity, Associational Type, and the Creation of Social Capital”, in: American Behavioral Scientist 42, pp. 47–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uslaner, E.M. (2002): The Moral Foundations of Trust, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warren, M.E. (ed.), (1999): Democracy and Trust, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warren, M.R. (2001): Dry Bones Rattling. Community Building to Revitalize American Democracy, Princeton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woolcock, M. (1998): “Social Capital and Economic Development”, in: Theory and Society 27, pp. 151–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woolcock, M. and Narayan, D. (2000): “Social Capital: Implications for Development Theory, Research, and Policy”, in: The World Bank Research Observer 15, pp. 225–49.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Baurmann, M. (2008). Political Norms, Markets and Social Capital. In: Kühnelt, J. (eds) Political Legitimization without Morality?. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8576-5_14

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics