Skip to main content

Watershed Management in the United States

  • Conference paper
Sustainable Use and Development of Watersheds

Abstract

A watershed approach provides an effective framework for dealing with water resources challenges. Watersheds provide drinking water, recreation, and ecological habitat, as well as a place for waste disposal, a source of industrial cooling water, and navigable inland water transport. Consequently, much depends on the health of watersheds. Watersheds are threatened by wastewater and nonpoint source runoff that load surface waters with excess organic matter, nutrients, pathogens, solids, and toxic substances. Physical alterations, such as paving and stream channelization, change both the hydrologic regime and habitat. Estuaries are of particular importance, since they have great economic, ecological, recreational, and aesthetic value. An approach to the protection, management, and restoration of these water resources in the United States, and the respective roles of federal, state, and local governments, as well as the private sector and volunteer groups, is discussed. Protecting and sustaining watersheds requires that water resource goals be prioritized within a coordinating framework.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Bernhardt, E.S., M.A. Palmer, J.D. Allan, G. Alexander, K. Barnas, S. Brooks, J. Carr, S. Clayton, C. Dahm, J. Follstad-Shah, D. Galat, S. Gloss, P. Goodwin, D. Hart, B. Hassett, R. Jenkinson, S. Katz, G.M. Kondolf, P.S. Lake, R. Lave, J.L. Meyer, T.K. O’Donnell, L. Pagano, B. Powell, and E. Sudduth. 2005. Synthesizing U.S. river restoration efforts. Science 308: 636-637.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bierman, V.J. Jr., S.C. Hinz, D.W. Zhu, W.J. Wiseman Jr., N.N. Rabalais, and R.E. Turner. 1994. A preliminary mass balance model of primary productivity and dissolved oxygen in the Mississippi River Plume/Inner Gulf Shelf Region. Estuaries 17(4): 886-899.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Borsuk, M.E., C.A. Stow, and K.H. Reckhow. 2003. An integrated approach to TMDL devel-opment for the Neuse River estuary using a Bayesian probability network model “Neu-BERN”. Journal of Water Resource Planning and Management Division of American Society of Civil Engineering 129(4): 271-282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowen, J.D. and J.W. Hieronymus. 2003. A CE-Qual-W2 model of the Neuse Estuary for Total Maximum Daily Load development. Journal of Water Resource Planning and Management Division of American Society of Civil Engineering 129(4): 283-294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowen, J.D. and J. Hieronymus. 2000. Neuse River estuary modeling and monitoring project stage 1: Predictions and uncertainty analysis of response to nutrient loading using a mechanistic eutrophication model. Rep. No. 325-D, October 2000. University of North Carolina, Charlotte, NC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, K. 2000. Urban Stream Restoration Practices: An Initial Assessment. The Center for Watershed Protection. Elliot City, MD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burns, L.A., D.M. Cline, and R.R. Lassiter. 1982. Exposure Analysis Modeling System (EXAMS): User Manual and System Documentation. EPA/600/3-82/023. Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Athens, GA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, S.R. and C. Folke. 2006. Ecology for transformation. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 21: 309-315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, D.D. 1996. Trends in nutrient inflows to the Gulf of Mexico from streams draining the conterminous United States 1972-1993. U.S. Geological Survey, Water Resources Investigations Report 96-4113. Prepared in cooperation with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Gulf of Mexico Program, Nutrient Enrichment Issue Committee, U.S. Geological Survey, Austin, TX, 60 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • FISRWG. 1998. Stream Corridor Restoration: Principles, Processes, and Practices. Federal Interagency Stream Restoration Working Group (FISRWG) (15 Federal agencies of the U.S. government). GPO Item No. 0120-A; SuDocs No. A 57.6/2:EN 3/PT.653.

    Google Scholar 

  • Francis, R.C., M.A. Hixon, M.E. Clarke, S.A. Murawski, and S. Ralston. 2007. Ten commandments for ecosystem-based fisheries scientists. Fisheries 32(5): 217-233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goolsby, D.A., W.A. Battaglin, G.B. Lawrence, R.S. Artz, B.T. Aulenbach, R.P. Hooper, D.R. Keeney, and G.J. Stensland. 1999. Flux and sources of nutrients in the MississippiAtchafalaya River basin. Topic 3 Report of the Integrated Assessment on Hypoxia in the Gulf of Mexico. NOAA Coastal Ocean Program Decision Analysis Ser. No. 17, NOAA Coastal Ocean Program, Silver Spring, MD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goolsby, D.A., W.A. Battaglin, B.T. Aulenbach, and R.P. Hooper. 2001. Nitrogen input to the Gulf of Mexico. Journal of Environmental Quality 30: 329-336.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hamrick, J. M. 1996. Users Manual for the Environmental Fluid Dynamics Computer Code. Special Rep. 331 in Applied Marine Science and Ocean Engineering, Virginia Institute of Marine Sciences, College of William and Mary, Williamsburg, VA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Killam, G. 2005. The Clean Water Act Owner’s Manual, 2nd Edition. River Network, Portland, OR.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leibowitz, S.G., P.J. Wigington Jr., M.C. Rains, and D.M. Downing. 2008. Non-navigable streams and adjacent wetlands: addressing science needs following the Supreme Court’s Rapanos decision. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 6, doi: 10.1890/070068.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, J.L., D.L. Strayer, J.B. Wallace, S.L. Eggert, G.S. Elfman, and N.E. Leonard. 2007. The contribution of headwater streams to biodiversity in river networks. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 43: 86-103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mississippi River/Gulf of Mexico Watershed Nutrient Task Force. 2001. Action Plan for Reducing, Mitigating, and Controlling Hypoxia in the Northern Gulf of Mexico. Office of Wetlands, Oceans, and Watersheds, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • NOAA. 2005. New Priorities for the 21st Century - Updated for FY 2006-FY 2011. NOAA’s Strategic Plan. Office of Program Planning and Integration, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Washington, DC. http://www.ppi.noaa.gov/pdfs/Strategic_Plans/Strategic_Plan_2006_FINAL_04282005.pdf).

  • Rabalais, N.N. and R.E. Turner. 2001. Hypoxia in the northern Gulf of Mexico: Description, causes, and change. In N.N. Rabalais and R.E. Turner (Eds.) Coastal and Estuarine Studies 58. American Geophysical Union, pp. 1-36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rabalais, N.N., R.E. Turner, and D. Scavia. 2002. Beyond science into policy: Gulf of Mexico hypoxia and the Mississippi River. BioScience 52: 129-142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosgen, D. 1996. Applied River Morphology, 2nd Edition. Wildland Hydrology, Fort Collins, CO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scavia, D., N.N. Rabalais, R.E. Turner, D. Justic, and W.J. Wiseman Jr. 2003. Predicting the response of Gulf of Mexico hypoxia to variations in Mississippi River nitrogen load. Limnology and Oceanography 48(3): 951-956.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • SIWI. 2007. Decision supports systems and IWRM. 2006 World Water Week Synthesis. Stockholm International Water Institute, Stockholm, p. 17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, R.E. and N.N. Rabalais. 2004. Suspended sediment, C, N, P, and Si yields from the Mississippi River Basin. Hydrobiologia 511: 79-89.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Code. 1972a. Marine Protection, Research and Sanctuaries Act of 1972. (Public Law 92-532; October 23, 1972; 86 Stat. 1052 and 1061. Titles I and II are codified at 33 U.S.C. 1401-1445. Title III is codified at 16 U.S.C. 1431-1445.)

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Code.1972b. Coastal Zone Management Act, 16 U.S.C. 1451 et seq. (1972). http://coast-almanagement.noaa.gov/.

  • U.S. Code. 1973. Title 16—Conservation, Chapter 35—Endangered Species. 7 U.S.C. 136; 16.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S.C. 460 et seq. (1973). http://www.access.gpo.gov/uscode/title16/chapter35_.html.

  • U.S. Code. 1974. Safe Drinking Water Act, 42U.S.C. s/s 300f et seq. (1974). At http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/getdoc.cgi?dbname=browse_usc&docid=Cite:+42USC300f.

  • U.S. Code. 1976a. Toxic Substances Control Act. 5 U.S.C. s/s 2601 et seq.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Code.1976b. Resource Conservation and Recovery Act.42 U.S.C. s/s 6901 et seq.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Code. 1977. Clean Water Act. 33 U.S.C. ss/1251 et seq. (1977). At http://www.access.gpo. gov/uscode/title33/chapter26_.html.

  • U.S. Code. 1980. Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act. 42 U.S.C. s/s 9601 et seq.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Code. 1988. Ocean Dumping Ban Act. Public Law 100-688, title I. (MPRSA Section 104B(a) ).

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Code. 1996. Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act. 7 U.S.C. s/s 136 et seq. USDA (U.S. Department of Agriculture). 2006. Natural Resources Conservation Service. Watershed Protection and Flood Prevention Act. 1954. (P.L.83-566). http://www.nrcs. usda.gov/programs/watershed/pl56631705.pdf.

  • U.S. EPA. 1994. Non-point source management programs (33 USC Sec1329).http://www.epa. gov/owow/nps/sec319cwa.html.

  • U.S. EPA. 1995. Section 319 National Monitoring Program: An Overview. http://www.epa. gov/OWOW/NPS/Section319/319over.html.

  • U.S. EPA. 1996. Watershed approach framework. http://www.epa.gov/owow/watershed/framework/.

  • U.S. EPA. 1997. Volunteer Stream Monitoring: A Methods Manual. EPA 841-B-97-003. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. EPA. 2000a. Beaches Environmental Assessment and Coastal Health Act of 2000. http://www.epa.gov/waterscience/beaches/rules/act.html.

  • U.S. EPA.2000b. Watershed Characterization System(WCS): User’s Manual. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4, Atlanta, GA.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. EPA. 2003. http://www.epa.gov/npdes/pubs/watershed-permitting-policy.pdf.

  • U.S. EPA. 2004. Classification Framework for Coastal Systems. EPA 600/R-04/061. National Health and Environmental Effects Research Laboratory, Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC, 66 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. EPA. 2005. Handbook for Developing Watershed Plans to Restore and Protect Our Waters. EPA 841-B-05-005, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. EPA. 2007a. National Estuary Program Coastal Condition Report. http://www.epa.gov/owow/oceans/nepccr/index.html.

  • U.S. EPA. 2007b. Water Headlines. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. August 13, 2007. The tool can be accessed at http://efc.boisestate.edu/efc/.

  • U.S. EPA. 2007c. Watershed-Based National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permitting Technical Guidance. EPA 833-B-07-004. Office of Wastewater Management, Water Permits Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, 75 p. http://www.epa.gov/npdes/pubs/watershed_techguidance.pdf).

  • U.S. EPA. 2007d. National Estuary Program Anniversary Fact Sheet. http://www.epa.gov/owow/estuaries/anniversaryfactsheet.pdf.

  • U.S. FWS. 2007. The Endangered Species Program. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. www.fws.gov/endangered/.

  • U.S. NMFS. 2007. NOAA Fisheries. Office of Protected Resources, National Marine Fisheries Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. http://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/.

  • Wool, T.A., S.R. Davie, and H.N. Rodriguez. 2003. Development of three dimensional hydro-dynamic and water quality model to support total maximum daily load decision process for the Neuse River Estuary, North Carolina. American Society of Civil Engineers, Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management 129(4): 295-306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer Science + Business Media B. V

About this paper

Cite this paper

Russo, R.C., Rashleigh, B., Ambrose, R.B. (2008). Watershed Management in the United States. In: Gönenç, İ.E., Vadineanu, A., Wolflin, J.P., Russo, R.C. (eds) Sustainable Use and Development of Watersheds. NATO Science for Peace and Security Series. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8558-1_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics