Skip to main content

From Global Environmental Discourse to Local Adaptations and Responses: A Desertification Research Agenda for Central Asia

Desertification Research Agenda for Central Asia

  • Conference paper
The Socio-Economic Causes and Consequences of Desertification in Central Asia

Part of the book series: NATO Science for Peace and Security Series ((NAPSC))

Abstract

The UN Convention to Combat Desertification was one of the key conventions emerging from the 1992 Conference on Environment and Development. At this meeting, inter-governmental organisations, NGOs and scientists agreed that desertification and land degradation are ‘major economic, social and environmental problems in all regions of the world’ and that they ‘should be addressed through a United Nations Convention to Combat Desertification’ (Chapter 12, Agenda 21; UNCCD, 1994). This chapter outlines the early stages of a novel research project that aims to explore the links between this global environmental discourse on desertification and the practical, local socio-economic impacts and responses to land degradation in the Central Asia region. It first explores the changing role of science in combating desertification. Second, it provides some background to the UN Convention to Combat Desertification, highlighting three key features of its approach: decentralisation, participation and the importance of local knowledge in anti-desertification activities. It then reviews the historical links between the environmental, social, political and economic dimensions of land degradation and desertification in Central Asia. A programme of activities is presented next, which is designed to investigate how the international approaches outlined in the UN Convention to Combat Desertification may impact upon national and local projects and policies to reduce land degradation and improve rural livelihoods. The paper concludes that there is a growing need for detailed, empirical case study research which reflects more intently on the tensions between international and local discourses of desertification. This is paramount in order to better understand the local challenges posed by the desertification issue, as well as contributing towards the creation of more appropriate and effective mitigation strategies at a regional level.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Agnew, C., and Warren, A., 1996, A framework for tackling drought and land degradation, Journal of Arid Environments, 33:309–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Agrawal, A., and Gibson, C. C., 1999, Enchantment and disenchantment: the role of community in natural resource conservation, World Development, 27:629–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alam, A., and Banerji, A., 2000, Uzbekistan and Kazakhstan: a tale of two transition paths?, World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, 2472.

    Google Scholar 

  • Babaev, A. G., (Ed.) 1985, Map of anthropogenic desertification of arid zones of the USSR, Ashgabat, Turkmenistan: Institute of Deserts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bäckstrand, K., 2004, Science, Uncertainty and Participation, Environmental Politics 13(3):650–656.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Batterbury, S. P. J., Behnke, R. H., Doll, P. M., Ellis, J. E., Harou, P. A., Lynam, T. J. P., Mtimet, A., Nicholson, S. E., Obando, J. A., and Thornes, J. B., 2002, Responding to desertification at the national scale, in: Global Desertification: Do Humans Cause Deserts?, J. F. Reynolds, and D. M. Stafford-Smith, ed., Dahlem University Press, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brookfield, H., 1995, Postscript: the ‘population-environment nexus’ and PLEC, Global Environmental Change 5, pp. 381–393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chasek, P. S., and Corell, E., 2002, Addressing desertification at the international level, in: Global Desertification: Do Humans Cause Deserts? J. F. Reynolds, and D. M. S. Stafford-Smith, ed., Dahlem University Press, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cherp, A., and Mnatsakanian, R., 2003, Environmental degradation in Eastern Europe, Caucasus and Central Asia: past roots, present transition and future hopes, Central European University, Budapest.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahlberg, A. C., 2000, Interpretations of environmental change and diversity: a critical approach to indications of degradation—the case of Kalakamate, northeast Botswana, Land Degradation & Development, 11(6):549–562.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daniels, S. E., and Walker, G. B., 1996, Collaborative learning: improving public deliberation in ecosystem-based management, Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 16:71–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dregne, H., Kassas, M., and Rozanov, B., 1991, Status of desertification and implementation of the United Nations Plan to Combat Desertification, Desertification Control Bulletin, 20(6).

    Google Scholar 

  • Eden, S., 1998, Environmental issues: knowledge, uncertainty and the environment, Progress in Human Geography 22:425–432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forsyth, T., 2003, Critical Political Ecology, Routledge, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holling, C. S., 1978, Adaptive environmental assessment and management, Wiley, New York, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kazakhstan NAP, 1997, Kazakhstan National Action Programme for Combating Desertification and Mitigating the Effects of Drought.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerven, C., Alimaev, I. I., Behnke, R., Davidson, G., Franchois, L., Malmakov, N., Mathijs, E., Smailov, A., Temirbekov, S., and Wright, I., 2004, Retraction and expansion of flock mobility in central Asia: costs and consequences, African Journal of Range and Forage Science, 21(3):91–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiker, C. F., Milon, J. W., and Hodges, A. W., 2001, Adaptive learning for science-based policy: the Everglades restoration, Ecological Economics, 37:403–416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kjellen, B., 2003, The saga of the Convention to Combat Desertification: The Rio/Johannesburg process and the global responsibility for the drylands. RECEIL, 12:127–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kyrgyzstan NAP, 2000, Kyrgyzstan National Action Programme for Combating Desertification and Mitigating the Effects of Drought.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larson, A. M., and Ribot, J. C., 2004, Democratic decentralisation through a natural resource lens: an introduction, European Journal of Development Research, 16:1–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leach, M., and Mearns, R., 1996, The Lie of the Land, The International African Institute in association with James Currey, Heinemann, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcussen, H. S., 2002, International conventions and the environment: what future for the international Convention to Combat Desertification?, in: Proceedings of the CCD Workshop, 26–27 February 2002, H. S. Marcussen, I. Nygaard, and A. Reenberg, eds., Denmark.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKendrick, J. H., 1999, Multi-method research: an introduction to its application in population geography., Professional Geographer, 51:40–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raissova, A., and Sartbayeva-Peleo, A., 2004, From Rio to Johannesburg: Comparing Sustainable Development in Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, and the Kyrgyz Republic, in: In the Tracks of Tamerlane: Central Asia’s Path to the 21st Century, D. L. Burghart, and T. Sabonis-Helf, ed., pp. 245–258.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, J. F., and Stafford-Smith, D. M., 2002, Do humans cause deserts? in: “Global Desertification: Do Humans Cause Deserts?, J. F. Reynolds, and D. M. S. Stafford-Smith, ed., Dahlem University Press, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ribot, J., 2004, Waiting for Democracy: Politics of Choice in Natural Resource Decentralization, World Resources Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robbins, P., 2000, The practical politics of knowing: state environmental knowledge and local political economy, Economic Geography 76:126–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, S., Milner-Gulland, E. J., Alimaev, A., 2003, Rangeland degradation in Kazakhstan during the Soviet era: re-examining the evidence, Journal of Arid Environments, 53:419–439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roe, E. M., 1991, Development narratives, or making the best of blueprint development, World Development, 19:287–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saiko, T. A., 1995, Implications of the disintegration of the former Soviet Union for desertification control, Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 37:289–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spoor, M., 1999, Agrarian transition in former Soviet central Asia: a comparative study of Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan and Uzbekistan, Working paper 298, Institute of Social Studies, The Hague.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiles, D., 1995, Social aspects of sustainable dryland management, Wiley, Chichester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stringer, L. C., and Reed, M. S., 2007. Land degradation assessment in southern Africa: integrating local and scientific knowledge bases. Land Degradation and Development 18:99–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sutton, R., 1999, The Policy Process: an Overview, Overseas Development Institute, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suleimenov, M., and Oram, P., 2000, Trends in feed, livestock production and rangelands during the transition period in three central Asian countries, Food Policy, 25:681–700.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tajikistan NAP, 2001, Tajikistan National Action Programme for Combating Desertification and Mitigating the Effects of Drought.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, D. S. G., and Middleton, N. J., 1994, Desertification: Exploding the Myth, Wiley, Chichester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toulmin, C., 1995, Combating desertification by conventional means, Global Environmental Change, 5:455–457.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turkmenistan NAP, 1997, Turkmenistan National Action Programme for Combating Desertification and Mitigating the Effects of Drought.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNEP, 1992, World Atlas of Desertification, Edward Arnold, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Convention to Combat Desertification, 1994, United Nations Convention to Combat Desertification in Those Countries Experiencing Serious Drought and/or Desertification Particularly in Africa: Text with Annexes UNEP, Nairobi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uzbekistan NAP, 1999, Uzbekistan National Action Programme for Combating Desertification and Mitigating the Effects of Drought.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warren, A., 2002, Land degradation is contextual, Land Degradation and Development, 13:449–459.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warren, A., and Batterbury, S., 2004, Desertification, in: The Routledge Encyclopaedia of International Development. T. Forsyth, ed., Routledge, London Accessed on 25 August 2005; http://www.u.arizona.edu/batterbu/papers/desertificationforsythweb.htm

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lindsay C. Stringer .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer Science + Business Media B.V

About this paper

Cite this paper

Stringer, L.C. (2008). From Global Environmental Discourse to Local Adaptations and Responses: A Desertification Research Agenda for Central Asia. In: Behnke, R. (eds) The Socio-Economic Causes and Consequences of Desertification in Central Asia. NATO Science for Peace and Security Series. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8544-4_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics