Skip to main content

Consumer Rights to Food Ethical Traceability

  • Chapter
Ethical Traceability and Communicating Food

Regulatory and scientific discourse about traceability in food production chains hitherto predominantly focused on the development of traceability schemes as a means towards the end of managing food-borne health risks. The overall aim of developing traceability schemes within this context of risk management in production chains has been to ensure that consumers can trust that their consumption of food products as provided in the market is not risky in terms of health consequences (see Chapter 2 for an overview of conceptual and operational aspects of traceability).

The chapter starts by introducing the basic liberal distinctions to be used subsequently. It then argues that the operational domain for ethical traceability should be positioned somewhere between needs like food safety that entail positive unconditional rights of consumers and positive unconditional duties of producers and regulators with respect to the provision and traceability of food products, and non-reasonable and/or superficial wants with respect to food that do not entail any rights and duties. The basic argument is that ethical traceability is operational within the domain of reasonable and non-superficial wants with respect to food, which entail conditional rights of consumers and conditional duties of producers and regulators. Before concluding, the chapter asks whether calls for the development of ethical traceability schemes are not better – if cynically – understood as veiled attempts to increase corporate power in food production chains.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Allen, J. (2001) ‘The place of negative morality in political theory’. Political Theory, 29/3: 337–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beekman, V. (2000) ‘You are what you eat: Meat, novel protein foods, and consumptive freedom’. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 12/2: 185–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beekman, V., E. de Bakker, H. Baranzke, O. Baune, M. Deblonde, E.-M. Forsberg, R. de Graaff, H.-W Ingensiep, J. Lassen, B. Mepham, A. Porsborg Nielsen, S. Tomkins, E. Thorstensen, K. Millar, B. Skorupinski, F. Brom, M. Kaiser, and P. Sandoe (2006) Ethical Bio-technology Assessment Tools for Agriculture and Food Production. Final Report Ethical Bio-TA Tools (QLG6-CT-2002–02594). The Hague: LEI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bracke, M.B.M., K. H. de Greef, and H. Hopster (2005) ‘Qualitative stakeholder analysis for the development of sustainable monitoring systems for farm animal welfare’. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 18/1: 27–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brom, F.W.A. (2000) ‘Food, consumer concerns, and trust: Food ethics for a globalizing market’. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 12/2: 127–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feinberg, J. (1987) Harm to Others. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1998) The Third Way. The Renewal of Social Democracy. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, K. (2004) ‘Does autonomy count in favor of labelling genetically modified food?’. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 17/1: 67–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirschauer, N. (2004) ‘A model-based approach to moral hazard in food chains. What contribution do principal-agent-models make to the understanding of food risks induced by opportunistic behaviour’. Agrarwirtschaft – German Journal of Agricultural Economics, 53: 192–205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Honneth, A. (1995) ‘Moral consciousness and class domination: Some problems in the analysis of hidden morality’ in C.W. Wright (ed.) The Fragmented World of the Social: Essays in Social and Political Philosophy by Axel Honneth. New York: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Korthals, M. (2001) ‘Taking consumers seriously: Two concepts of consumer sovereignty’. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 14/2: 201–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuiper, H.A., G. A. Kleter, A. Konig, W. P. Hammes, and I. Knudsen (eds.) (2004) ‘Safety assessment, detection and traceability, and societal aspects of genetically modified foods’. Food and Chemical Toxicology, 42/7: 1043–1202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kymlicka, W. (1990) Contemporary Political Philosophy: An Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lang, T. and M. Heasman (2004) Food Wars: The Global Battle for Minds, Mouths, and Markets. London: Earthscan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michalopoulos, T. (2006) ‘The citizen goes shopping: What do the peers have to say about it?’, pp. 483–487 in M. Kaiser and M. E. Lien (eds.) Ethics and the Politics of Food. Wageningen: Wageningen Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nestlé, M. (2002) Food Politics: How the Food Industry Influences Nutrition and Health. Berkeley/Los Angeles: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J. (1972) A Theory of Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J. (1993) Political Liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raz, J. (1986) The Morality of Freedom. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rippe, K.P. (2000) ‘Novel foods and consumer rights. Concerning food policy in a liberal state’. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 12/2: 71–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rubel, A. and R. Streiffer (2005) ‘Respecting the autonomy of European and American consumers: Defending positive labels on GM foods’. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 18/1: 75–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Selznick, P. (1992) The Moral Commonwealth. Social Theory and the Promise of Community. Berkeley/Los Angeles: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlosser, E. (2001) Fast Food Nation. What the All-American Meal is Doing to the World. London: Allen Lane/Penguin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wall, S. and G. Klosko (eds.) (2003) Perfectionism and Neutrality. Essays in Liberal Theory. Boston: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer Science + Business Media B.V

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Beekman, V. (2008). Consumer Rights to Food Ethical Traceability. In: Coff, C., Barling, D., Korthals, M., Nielsen, T. (eds) Ethical Traceability and Communicating Food. The International Library of Environmental, Agricultural and Food Ethics, vol 15. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8524-6_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics