The Great Siberian Forest: Challenges and Opportunities of Scale

  • Igor M. Danilin
  • Thomas R. Crow


The vastness or scale of the Siberian forest presents both an opportunity and a challenge. It is a major source of softwood fiber in a world in which softwood fiber is in great demand. Its vastness and isolation from markets make it more difficult to regulate harvesting and to get both raw material and processed wood to consumers. Both natural and anthropogenic disturbances (e.g., fire, climate change) greatly alter forest landscapes and complicate the management of the resource for sustainability. We characterize the current condition of the Siberian forest in Russia and recommend future directions for this globally-important resource. The future is promising because Siberia has a relatively well-developed forest infrastructure, along with highly-trained scientists, an existing structure of forest enterprises, and some protective and regulatory measures that serve as a basis for developing and sustaining the resource. However, investments directed at modernization, especially technological, are needed to enhance the country’s capacity to promote sustainable development in the forestry sector.


Forest Landscape Biomass Increment Forest Enterprise Insect Outbreak Grow Stock 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Crow TR (2005) Landscape ecology and forest management. In: Wiens J, Moss M (eds) Issues and perspectives in landscape ecology, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 201–207Google Scholar
  2. Crow TR (2008) Managing forest landscapes for climate change. In: Lafortezza R, Chen J, Sanesi G, Crow TR (eds) Patterns and processes in forest landscapes – Multiple use and sustainable management, SpringerGoogle Scholar
  3. Danilin IM (1995) Structure and biomass of larch stands regenerating naturally after clear cut logging. Water Air Soil Pollut, 82(12):125–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Danilin IM (2003) Morfologicheskaya struktura, produktivnost’ i distancionnye metody taksacii drevostoev Sibiri (Morphological structure, productivity and remote sensing methods for forest inventory of the Siberian tree stands). Dissertation, V.N. Sukachev Institute of Forest, Russian Academy of Sciences, Siberian Branch, Krasnoyarsk, Russia, 537p (in Russian)Google Scholar
  5. Danilin I, Kobayashi S, Abe N (1996) Growth dynamics and biodiversity of larch forest after wildfire at the north of Central Siberia. World Res Rev 8(2):215–230Google Scholar
  6. Danilin IM, Medvedev EM, Abe NI et al. (2005) Lesoustroistvo v zapovednikah – principy i metody. Podkhody k obobscheniyu opyta (Forest planning at natural reserves – principles and methods. Approaches for summarizing the experience). V.N. Sukachev Institute of Forest, Russian Academy of Sciences, Siberian Branch Publ., Krasnoyarsk, Russia, 118p (in Russian)Google Scholar
  7. Enciklopedia lesnogo khozyaistva (Encyclopedia of Forestry) (2006) VNIILM, Moscow V1 p 424 (in Russian)Google Scholar
  8. Isaev AS, Korovin GN, Zamolodchikov DG et al (1995) Carbon stock and deposition in phytomass of the Russian forests. Water Air Soil Pollut 82(1t2):247–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Organizaciya osobo okhranyaemykh prirodnykh territorii (Organization of especially protected natural areas) (2002) Sokolov VA, Farber SK, Danilin IM et al. Russian Academy of Sciences, Siberian Branch, Publ., Novosibirsk, Russia, p 264 (in Russian with abstract in English)Google Scholar
  10. Osnovy lesnoi politiki v Krasnoyarskom krae (Bases of forest policy at Krasnoyarsk territory) (2000) Sokolov VA, Semetchkin IV, Danilin IM et al. Russian Academy of Sciences, Siberian Branch, Publ., Novosibirsk, Russia, p 246 (in Russian with abstract in English)Google Scholar
  11. Pozdnyakov LK (1986) Les na vechnoi merzlote (Forest at permafrost). Nauka Publ., Siberian Branch, Novosibirsk, Russia, p 192 (in Russian)Google Scholar
  12. Problemy ustoichivogo lesopol’zovaniya (Problems of sustainable forest use) (1998) Sokolov VA, Danilin IM, Farber SK et al. Russian Academy of Sciences, Siberian Branch, Press, Krasnoyarsk, Russia, 225p (in Russian with abstract in English)Google Scholar
  13. Russian Forests and Forestry. Data and Analysis. Version 1.0. IIASA, 2007
  14. Schulze E-D, Wirth C, Heimann M (2000) Managing forests after Kyoto. Science 289(5487):2058–2059PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Shvidenko AZ, Schepaschenko DG, Nilsson S et al. (2004) Sistema modelei rosta i dinamiki produktivnosti lesov Rossii (tablicy biologicheskoi produktivnosti) (System of models for growth and productivity dynamics of Russian forests (tables of biological productivity)). Lesnoe khozyaistvo (Forest management) 2:40–44 (in Russian)Google Scholar
  16. Siberian forests: approach from Russian and Japanese researchers (2004) Abe N, Sokolov VÀ, Danilin IM. Japan Forestry Investigation Committee, Tokyo, Japan, 243p (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  17. Sokolov VA, Danilin IM, Semetchkin IV et al. (2003) Siberian expectations: an overview of regional forest policy and sustainable forest management, World Forest Institute Publ., Portland, Oregon, USA, 67p, Cited 15 Jan 2003Google Scholar
  18. Stocks BJ, Fosberg MA, Lynham TJ, Mearns L, Wotton BM, Yang Q, Jin J-Z, Lawrence K,Hartley GR, Mason JA, McKenney DW (1998) Climate change and forest fire potential in Russian and Canadian boreal forests. Climatic Change 38(1):1–13Google Scholar
  19. Terra Norte (2007)

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Igor M. Danilin
    • 1
  • Thomas R. Crow
  1. 1.V.N. Sukachev Institute of Forest Russian Academy of Sciences Siberian BranchAkademgorodok, 50/28Russia

Personalised recommendations