Skip to main content

High Consequence Plant Pathogens

  • Conference paper
Crop Biosecurity

Threatening pathogens present a great concern since they can impact agriculture, economy, international trade and environmental diversity. Among the pathogens which cause increased agricultural and social concern are new or re-emerging pathogens. Most of the important agricultural crops have spread during the last two centuries outside their original environment all over the world. An immediate and parallel trend is the migration of pathogens which accompanies the international crop spread. Thus crops become more vulnerable to new disease in their new environment. Therefore, quarantine lists for non indigenous and high consequence pathogens are specified in each country. The compilation of such lists is aimed at minimizing the invasion of these specified pests and prevents their potential damage on the local agriculture. High consequence pathogens include mycotoxin-producing organisms, bunt and smut pathogens, foliar diseases, soilborne pathogens and forest diseases. These are classified mainly according to pest risk analysis, the type of threat, type of pathogens and the circle of impact.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Anderson PK, Cuningham AA, Patel NG, Morales FJ, Epstein PR, Daszak P. (2004) Emerging infectious disease of plants: pathogen pollution, climate change and agrotechnology drivers. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 19: 535-544

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cook D, Proctor W. (2007) Assessing the threat of exotic plant pests. Ecological Economics 63: 594-604

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Damsteegt VD (1999) New and emerging plant viruses. APS online. http://www.apsnet.org/ online/feature/newviruses/top.html. Accessed on 7 November 2007

  • De la Perriere RAB, Amir H, Bounaga N. (1995) Prospects for integrated control of ‘bayoud’ (Fusarium wilt of the date palm) in Algerian Plantations. Crop Protection 14: 227-235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • European and Mediterranean Plant Protection Organization. (2007) EPPO A1 and A2 Lists of pests recommended for regulation as quarantine pests. http://www.eppo.org/QUARANTINE/quarantine.htm. Accessed on 7 November 2007.

  • Foxell JW. (2001) Current trends in agroterrorism (antilivestock, anticrop, and antisoil bioagricultural terrorism) and their potential impact on food security. Studies in Conflict and Terrorism 24: 107-129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jay M, Morad M, Bell A. (2003) Biosecurity, a policy dilemma for New Zealand. Land Use Policy 20: 121-129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Madden LV (2001) What are the nonindigenous plant pathogens that threaten US crops and forests? APS Feature story: http://www.aps.org/online/feature/exotic. Accessed on 8 November 2007.

  • Madden LV, Bosch FV. (2002) A population-dynamics approach to assess the threat of plant pathogens as bilogtical weapons against annual crops. BioScience 52: 65-74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall D, Work TT, Cavey JF. (2003) Invasion pathways of Karnal bunt of wheat into the United States. Plant Dis. 87: 999-1003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pheloung PC, Williams PA, Halloy SR. (1999) A weed risk assessment model for use as a biosecurity tool evaluating plant introductions. Journal of Environmental management 57: 239-251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schaad NW, Shaw JJ, Vidaver A, Leach J, Erlick BJ. (1999) Crop Biosecurity. APS Feature article. http://www. Apsnet.org/online/feature/Biosecurity. Accessed on 7 November 2007.

  • Tsror L, Aharon M, Erlic J. (1999) A survey of bacterial and fungal seedborne diseases in imported and domestic potato seed tubers. Phytoparasitica 27: 215-226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • United States Department of Agricuture, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (2007) online: http://www.aphis.usda.gov/programs/ag_selectagent/ag_bioterr_toxinslist.html. Accessed on 8 November 2007

  • Wheelis M, Casagrande R, Madden LV. (2002) Biological attack on agriculture: Low tech high impact bioterrorism. BioScience 52: 569-576

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitby SM. (2001) The potential use of plant pathogens against crops. Microbes and Infection 3: 71-80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang XB, Dowler WM, Royer MH. (1991) Assessing the risk and potential impact of an exotic plant disease. Plant Disease 75: 976-982

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer Science + Business Media B.V

About this paper

Cite this paper

Gamliel, A. (2008). High Consequence Plant Pathogens. In: Gullino, M.L., Fletcher, J., Gamliel, A., Stack, J.P. (eds) Crop Biosecurity. NATO Science for Peace and Security Series C: Environmental Security. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8476-8_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics