Skip to main content

The Liar Cannot Be Solved

  • Chapter
Book cover Unity, Truth and the Liar

Part of the book series: Logic, Epistemology, and the Unity of Science ((LEUS,volume 8))

  • 653 Accesses

Attempting to resolve the Liar paradox in a simple and straightforward way, Stephen Read suggests a modification of Tarski's famous truth-schema that he claims turns the Liar paradox into an innocent sentence, which is simply false. In my note I examine the way Read tries to solve the paradox and argue that some doubts can be raised regarding the successfulness of his attempt. I analyze his project from two independent points of view. First, I try to shed light on some weak points in Read's argument, then I present my own arguments to the effect that any revision of Tarski's truth-schema can, in principle, be only a part of the solution to the Liar paradox.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1] Boolos, G. (1995).The Logic of Provability. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  2. [2] Goldblatt, R. (1992).Logics of Time and Computation. Stanford:CSLI.

    Google Scholar 

  3. [3] Goldstein, L. (1986). Epimenides and curry.Analysis46(3): 117–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. [4] Kleene, S.C. (1964).Introduction to Metamathematics. Princeton:D. Van Nostrand Company, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  5. [5] Kripke, S. (1984) Outline of a theory of truth, in: R.L. Martin (ed.)Recent Essays on Truth and the Liar Paradox. Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp. 53–81.

    Google Scholar 

  6. [6] Langford, C.H. and Lewis, C.I. (1959).Symbolic Logic(2nd edition). New York: Dover.

    Google Scholar 

  7. [7] Priest, G., R. Routley, and J. Norman (eds.) (1989).Paraconsistent Logic: Essays on the Inconsistent, München: Philosophia Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  8. [8] Prior, A.N. (1958). Epimenides the Cretan.The Journal of Symbolic Logic23(3): 261–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. [9] Read, S. (1988).Relevant Logic. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  10. [10] Read, S. (2005). The Truth Schema and the liar.

    Google Scholar 

  11. [11] Sainsbury, R.M. (1989).Paradoxes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  12. [12] Serény, G. (2003). Gödel, Tarski, Church, and the Liar.The Bulletin of Symbolic Logic9(1): 3–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. [13] Tarski, A. (1944). The semantic conception of truth.Philosophy and Phenomenological Research4.

    Google Scholar 

  14. [14] Tarski, A. (1956) The concept of truth in formalized languages, in: A. Tarski (ed.)Logic, Semantics, Metamatematics. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer Science + Business Media B.V

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Serény, G. (2008). The Liar Cannot Be Solved. In: Rahman, S., Tulenheimo, T., Genot, E. (eds) Unity, Truth and the Liar. Logic, Epistemology, and the Unity of Science, vol 8. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8468-3_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics