Advertisement

Evaluating the Effects of Emission Reductions on Multiple Pollutants Simultaneously

  • Deborah Luecken
  • Alan Cimorelli
  • Cynthia Stahl
  • Daniel Tong
Conference paper
Part of the NATO Science for Peace and Security Series Series C: Environmental Security book series (NAPSC)

Abstract

Modeling studies over the Philadelphia metropolitan area have examined how emission control strategies might affect several types of air pollutants simultaneously. NOx reductions in July are predicted to increase ozone in the urban core and decrease it elsewhere, decrease PM2.5 and formaldehyde, and slightly increase acetaldehyde and 1,3-butadiene. In January, NOx reductions increase ozone, formaldehyde and acetaldehyde everywhere. VOC reductions decrease aldehydes but have little effect on ozone in this domain. A combination of VOC and NOx reductions reflects the cumulative behavior of each of the emission reductions separately, and minimizes disbenefits for both HAPs and ozone. A comparison of these changes in terms of their effect on health shows that differing behavior of PM2.5 and ozone can counterbalance each other to some extent. While changes in HAPs are affected by changes to reduce ozone and PM2.5, their effect on health impacts is smaller than PM2.5 and ozone. This study supports considering effects of multiple pollutants in determining optimum pollution control strategies.

Keywords

Emission control HAPs multipollutant ozone 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. American Cancer Society (2001) Cancer Facts and Figures, 2001. http://www. cancer.org/downloads/STT/F&F2001.pdf
  2. Bell ML, McDermott A, Zeger SL, Samet JM, Dominici F (2004) Ozone and short-term mortality in 95 US urban communities, 1987-2000. Journal of the American Medical Association, 292, 2372-2378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Blanchard C, Tanenbaum, S, Hidy GM (2007) Effects of sulfur dioxide and oxides of nitrogen emission reductions on fine particulate matter mass concentrations: regional comparisons, Journal of the Air and Waste Management Association, 57, 1337-1350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Burnett RT, Smith-Doiron M, Stieb D, Raizenne ME, Brook JR, Dales RE, Leech JA, Cakmak S. Krewski D (2001) Association between ozone and hospital-lization for acute respiratory diseases in children less than 2 years of age,  American Journal of Epidemiology, 153 (5), 444-452.Google Scholar
  5. Byun D, Schere KL (2003) Review of the governing equations, computational algorithms, and other components of the Models-3 Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) modeling system, Applied Mechanics Reviews, 59, 51-77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Carter WPL (2000) Implementation of the SAPRC-99 Chemical Mechanism into the Models-3 Framework; Report to the United States Environmental Protection Agency, http://www.cert.ucr.edu/∼carter/absts.htm#s99mod3
  7. Community Modeling and Analysis System (2006) University of North Carolina, http://www.cmascenter.org/help/documentation.cfm?temp_id=99999
  8. Georgopoulos PG, Wang S-W, Vikram M, Vyas VM, Sun Q, Burke J, Vedantham R, Mccurdy T, Ozkaynak H (2006) A source-to-dose assessment of population exposures to fine PM and ozone in Philadelphia, PA, during a summer 1999 epi-sode, Journal of Exposure Analysis and Environmental Epidemiology, 15, 439-457.Google Scholar
  9. Luecken DJ, Hutzell WT, Gipson G (2006) Development and Analysis of Air Quality Modeling Simulations for Hazardous Air Pollutants, Atmospheric Envi-ronment, 40, 5087-5096.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. MM5 Community Model (2007) Pennsylvania State University and National Center for Atmospheric Research, http://box.mmm.ucar.edu/mm5
  11. National Research Council (1991) Rethinking the Ozone Problem in Urban and Regional Air Pollution, National Academy Press, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  12. Pope C.A, Burnett RT, Thun MJ, Calle EE, Krewski D, Ito K, Thurston GD (2002) Lung cancer, cardiopulmonary mortality, and long-term exposure to fine parti-culate air pollution, Journal of the American Medical Association 287(9), 1132-1141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Russell AG, McCue KF, Cass GR (1988) Mathematical modeling of the formation of nitrogen-containing pollutants. 2. Evaluation of the effect of emission con-trols, Environmental Science and Technology 22, 1336-1347.Google Scholar
  14. Scheffe R, Hubbell B, Fox T, Rao V, Pennell W (2007) The rationale for a multipollutant, multimedia air quality management framework, Environmental Manager, May 2007, 14-20.Google Scholar
  15. Stieb, DM, Burnett RT, Beveridge RC, Brook JR (1996) Association between ozone and asthma emergency department visits in Saint John, New Brunswick, Canada, Environmental Health Perspectives 104(12), 1354-1360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Tong D, Muler NZ, Mauzerall DL, Mendelsohn RO (2006) Integrated assessment of the spatial variability of ozone impacts from emissions of nitrogen oxides, Environmental Science and Technology, 40, 1395-1400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. US EPA (2007) Integrated Risk Information System, http://www.epa.gov/iris
  18. US EPA (2006) 1999 National Scale Air Toxics Assessment, http://www.epa.gov/ ttn/atw/nata1999/nsata99.html
  19. US EPA (1999) The Benefits and Costs of the Clean Air Act 1990 to 2010, EPA Report to Congress, http://www.epa.gov/oar/sect812/prospective1.html

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media B.V 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Deborah Luecken
    • 1
  • Alan Cimorelli
  • Cynthia Stahl
  • Daniel Tong
  1. 1.Atmospheric Sciences Modeling DivisionNational Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration /EPAResearch Triangle ParkUSA

Personalised recommendations