Modelling Regional Aerosols: Impact of Cloud Processing on Gases and Particles over Eastern North America and in Its Outflow During ICARTT 2004
A regional aerosol model, AURAMS (A Unified Regional Air-quality Modelling System), is used to simulate gases and aerosols over eastern North America for the ICARTT field campaign period during summer 2004. The model performance is evaluated against both ground-based and airborne observations during the field campaign. A model sensitivity study is used to assess the impact of cloud processing on the aerosol characteristics in the air masses over eastern North America and its outflow to the North Atlantic during the study period.
KeywordsAir-quality modelling cloud processing of gas and aerosol regional aerosols
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Bouchet VS, Crevier L-P, Cousineau S, Ménard S, Moffet R, Gong W, Makar P, Moran M, Pabla B (2004) Realtime regional air quality modelling in support of the ICARTT 2004 campaign. Proc. 27th NATO/CCMS ITM on Air Pollution Modelling and Its Application, Banff, Canada, October 25-29.Google Scholar
- FehsenfeldFC, Ancellet G, Bates T, Goldstein A, Hardesty M, Honrath R, Law K, Lewis A, Leaitch R, McKeen S, Meagher J, Pattish DD, Pszenny A, Russell P, Schlager H, Seinfeld J, Trainer M, Talbot R, (2006)International Consortium for Atmospheric Research on Transport and Transformation (ICARTT) North America to Europe Overview of the 2004 summer field study, J. Geophys. Res., 111, D23S01, doi:10.1029/2006JD007829.Google Scholar
- Hayden KL, Macdonald AM, Gong W, Toom-Sauntry D, Anlauf KG, Leithead A, Li S-M, Leaitch WR, Noone K (2007) Cloud Processing of Nitrate, J. Geophys. Res. (submitted).Google Scholar
- Leithead A, Macdonald AM, Li SM, Gong W, Anlauf KG, Toom-Sauntry D, Hayden KL, Leaitch WR (2006) Investigation of carbonyls in cloud-water during ICARTT, J. Geophys. Res. (submitted).Google Scholar
- Macdonald AM, Anlauf KG, Leaitch WR, Liu P (2006)“Multi-year chemistry of particles and selected trace gases at the Whistler high elevation site”,Eos. Trans. AGU, 87(52), Fall Meet. Suppl., Abstract A53B-0179.Google Scholar
- McKeen S, Wilczak J, Grell G, Djalalova I, Peckham S, Hsie E-Y, Gong W, Bouchet V, Ménard S, Moffet R, McHenry J, McQueen J, Tang Y, Carmichael GR, Pagowski M, Chan A, Dye T (2005)Assessment of an ensemble of seven real-time ozone forecasts over Eastern North America during the summer of 2004, J. Geophys. Res., 110, D21307, doi:10.1029/2005JD005858, 16 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- McKeen S, Chung SH, Wilczak J, Grell G, Djalalova I, Peckham S, Gong W, Bouchet V, Moffet R, Tang Y, Carmichael GR, Mathur R, Yu S (2007) Evaluation of several real-time PM2.5 forecast models using data collected during the ICARTT/NEAQS 2004 field study, J. Geophys. Res., 112, D10S20, doi:10.1029/2006JD007608, 20 pp.Google Scholar
- Moran MD, Zheng Q, Samaali M (2007) Long-term multi-species performance eva-luation of AURAMS for first 2002 annual run. EC internal report, Toronto, Ontario (in preparation). (Available from first author: email Mike.Moran@ec.-gc.ca)Google Scholar
- Tarasick DW, Moran MD, Thompson AM, Carey-Smith T, Rochon Y, Bouchet VS, Gong W, Makar PA, Stroud C, Ménard S, Crevier L-P, Cousineau S, Pudykiewicz JA, Kallaur A, Moffet R, Ménard R, Robichaud A, Cooper OR, Oltmans SJ, Witte JC, Forbes G, Johnson BJ, Merrill J, Moody JL, Morris G, Newchurch MJ, Schmidlin FJ, Joseph E (2007) Comparison of Canadian air quality forecast models with tropospheric ozone profile measurements above mid-latitude North America during the IONS/ICARTT campaign: evidence for stratospheric input, J. Geophys. Res., 112, D10S20, doi:10.1029/2006JD007782 (In press).Google Scholar
- U.S. EPA (2004) NOx Budget Trading Program: 2003 Progress and Compliance Report, Clean Air Markets Program, Office of Air and Radiation, U.S. Envi-ronmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, August, 28 pp. + App. (Available from http://www.epa.gov/airmarkets/progress/progress-reports.html:viewed 11 June 2007)Google Scholar
- JZhangWGongWRLeaitchJWStrapp(2007)Evaluation of modeled cloud properties against aircraft observations for air quality applications, J. Geophys. Res., 112, D10S16, doi:10.1029/2006JD007596.Google Scholar