The Gold Standard for education research promotes randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that can produce generalizable knowledge claims across similar problems and situations. Unfortunately, the Gold Standard does not fully recognize the need for developmental research to better understand the problem space, formulate theory and approaches to teaching and learning, and formulate and pursue associated research questions. This developmental research has been a precursor to the development of interventions together with the necessary instrumentation and technologies required to fully investigate these through the more formal evaluative processes imagined by the Gold Standard. This chapter focuses on longitudinal studies that cover a continuum from such developmental research to research that uses control-experimental features to evaluate interventions. These studies attend to a set of issues dealing with developmental progressions and learning trajectories that require investigation over an extended period of time. It will be argued that these longitudinal studies of a variety of methodological types represent quality research in that rigorous design and implementation produce evidence-based claims. The chapter examines the nature of the relationship between evidence and claims in these studies, to show the possibility of building in control features every bit as strong as those in classic Gold Standard designs. Further, it will be argued that, given the complexity of learning pathways, a simplistic interpretation of RCTs conducted over the shorter term can be misleading in terms of both internal and external validity claims.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Adey, P. S. (2005). Issues arising from the long-term evaluation of cognitive acceleration programs. Research in Science Education, 35(1), 3–22.
Arzi, H. J. (1988). From short- to long-term: Studying science education longitudinally. Studies in Science Education,15(1), 17–53.
Arzi, H. J. (2004). On the time dimension in educational processes and educational research. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics,&Technology Education, 4(1), 15–21.
Black, P. J.,&Simon, S. (1992). Progression in learning science. Research in Science Education, 22(1), 45–54.
Campbell, D. T.,&Stanley, J. C. (1963). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. In N. L. Gage (Ed.), Handbook of research in science teaching (pp. 171–246). Chicago: Rand McNally.
Eskilsson, O. (1999). Longitudinal study on lab work and 10–12-year-olds' development on the concepts of transformation of matter. In J. Leach&A. C. Paulsen (Eds.). Practical work in science education (pp. 229–243). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
Gauld, C. (1986). Models, meters and memory. Research in Science Education, 16(1), 49–54.
Guba, E. G.,&Lincoln, Y. S. (1994). Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin&Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (pp. 105–117). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Helldén, G. F. (2004). A study of recurring core developmental features in students' conceptions of some key ecological processes. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics,&Technology Education, 4(1), 59–76.
Helldén, G. F. (2005). Exploring understandings and responses to science: A program of longitudinal studies. Research in Science Education, 35(1), 99–122.
Holgersson, I.,&Löfgren, L. (2004). A long-term study of students' explanations of transformations of matter. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics,&Technology Education, 4(1), 77–96.
Hubber, P. (2004, April). Students' changing conceptions of light over three years of instruction. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Hubber, P. (2005). Exploration of Year 10 students' conceptual change during instruction.,Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 6(1), Article 1, 1–27. Retrieved from http:// www.ied.edu.hk/apfslt/
Hubber, P. (2006). Year 12 students' mental models of the nature of light. Research in Science Education, 36(4), 419–439.
Johnson, P. (2005). The development of children's concept of a substance: A longitudinal study of interaction between curriculum and learning. Research in Science Education, 35(1), 41–61.
Novak, J. D. (2005). Results and implications of a 12-year longitudinal study of science concept learning. Research in Science Education, 35(1), 23–40.
Shapiro, B. (Ed.). (2004a). Developing understanding: Research on science learning and teaching over time [Special Issue]. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics,&Technology Education, 4(1), 1–6.
Shapiro, B. (2004b). Studying lifeworlds of science learning: A longitudinal study of changing ideas, contexts, and personal orientations in science learning. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics,&Technology Education, 4(1), 127–147.
Shymansky, J. A., Woodworth, G., Norman, O., Dunkhase, J., Matthews, C.,&Liu, C. T. (1993). A study of changes in middle school teachers' understanding of selected ideas in science as a function of an in-service program focusing on student preconceptions. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30(7), 737–755.
Shymansky, J. A., Yore, L. D.,&Anderson, J. O. (2004). Impact of a school district's science reform effort on the achievement and attitudes of third- and fourth-grade students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(8), 771–790.
Shymansky, J. A., Yore, L. D., Treagust, D. F., Thiele, R. B., Harrison, A., Waldrip, B. G., et al. (1997). Examining the construction process: A study of changes in level 10 students' understanding of classical mechanics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34(6), 571–593.
Tytler, R. (1998a). Children's conceptions of air pressure: Exploring the nature of conceptual change. International Journal of Science Education, 20(8), 929–958.
Tytler, R. (1998b). The nature of students' informal science conceptions. International Journal of Science Education, 20(8), 901–927.
Tytler, R. (2005). School innovation in science: Change, culture, complexity. In K. Boersma, M. Goedhart, O. de Jong,&H. Eijkelhof (Eds.), Research and the quality of science education (pp. 89–105). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
Tytler, R. (2007). School Innovation in Science: A model for supporting school and teacher development. Research in Science Education, 37(2), 189–216.
Tytler, R., Arzi, H. J.,&White, R. T. (2005). Longitudinal studies on student learning in science [Editorial]. Research in Science Education, 35(1), 1–2.
Tytler, R.,&Peterson, S. (2004). Young children learning about evaporation: A longitudinal perspective. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics,&Technology Education, 4(1), 111–126.
Tytler, R.,&Peterson, S. (2005). A longitudinal study of children&s developing knowledge and reasoning in science. Research in Science Education, 35(1), 63–98.
United States National Research Council. (1999). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Committee on Developments in the Science of Learning. J. D. Bransford, A. L. Brown,&R. R. Cocking (Eds.). Commission on Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
United States National Research Council. (2005). How students learn: Science in the classroom. Committee on How people learn, A Targeted Report for Teachers. M. S. Donovan&J. D. Bransford (Eds.). Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
United States National Research Council. (2007). Taking science to school: Learning and teaching science in grades K-8. Committee on Science Learning, Kindergarten through Eighth Grade. R. A. Duschl, H. A. Schweingruber,&A. W. Shouse (Eds.). Board on Science Education, Center for Education, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
White, R. T. (1987, April). The future of research on cognitive structure and conceptual change. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Washington, DC.
White, R. T. (2001). The revolution in research on science teaching. In V. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (4th edn., pp. 457–471). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
White, R. T.,&Arzi, H. J. (2005). Longitudinal studies: Designs, validity, practicality, and value. Research in Science Education, 35(1), 137–149.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2009 Springer Science + Business Media B.V
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Tytler, R. (2009). Longitudinal Studies into Science Learning: Methodological Issues. In: Shelley, M.C., Yore, L.D., Hand, B. (eds) Quality Research in Literacy and Science Education. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8427-0_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8427-0_5
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-8426-3
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-8427-0
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)