Advertisement

Funding Patterns and Priorities: An International Perspective

  • Hsiao-Ching SheEmail author
  • Larry D. Yore
  • John O. Anderson
  • Sibel Erduran
  • Wolfgang Gräber
  • Alister Jones
  • Johannes Klumpers
  • Stephen Parker
  • Marissa Rollnick
  • Robert D. Sherwood
  • Bruce Waldrip
Chapter
  • 1.2k Downloads

Research in literacy and science education converge onto science literacy for all found in many international reforms (Hand, Prain, & Yore, 2001) and the commonalities in targets (all students), goals (science literacy composed of fundamental literacy and understanding the big ideas in science), and pedagogy (constructivist approaches and authentic assessment) across English language arts and science (Ford, Yore, & Anthony, 1997; Yore, Pimm, & Tuan, 2007). Similar claims apply to mathematics literacy and technology literacy. This convergence and the international move to enhance research quality suggest potential relationships amongst research policy, practices, and funding for literacy and science education. Furthermore, such connections should be growing in importance and fiscal priority for funding agencies. In the United States, explicit connections can be seen for research policy and preferred research practice in federal laws—but are there similar connections between policy and practice with research funding of literacy and science education research? Do such relationships exist in other countries?

Two recent policies in the United States illustrate the potential connection. The No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 (NCLB, 2002) reauthorized a number of federal programs aiming to improve the performance of primary and secondary schools by increasing the standards of accountability for states, school districts, and schools as well as providing parents more flexibility in choosing which schools their children will attend. The NCLB Act, which is open for renewal in 2008/09, requires states to develop assessments in language arts, mathematics, and science to be given to all students in certain grades—if those states are to receive federal funding for schools. The Education Sciences Reform Act of 2002 (ESRA, 2002) reauthorized and strengthened the principal education research, statistics, and evaluation activities of the Department of Education. This act funds the national data collection system that allows federal agencies to oversee the entire national education system and promotes a strong, scientifically rigorous research capacity within education. It is believed that such legislation is critically important to the successful implementation of the education reforms and to transform education into an evidence-based field, commonly called the Gold Standard.

Keywords

European Union Science Education Education Research International Perspective Science Education Research 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alberta CRYSTAL Project. (n.d.). Homepage. Retrieved June 19, 2008, from http://www. uofaweb.ualberta.ca/edpolicystudies/crystalalberta.cfm
  2. Australia National Health and Medical Research Council. (n.d.). Homepage. Retrieved June 19, 2008, from http://www.nhmrc.gov.au/
  3. Australian Council for Educational Research. (n.d.). Homepage. Retrieved June 19, 2008, from http://www.acer.edu.au/
  4. Australian Department of Education, Science and Training. (2007, February 7). New awards to promote science in primary schools [Press release]. Retrieved from http://www.dest.gov.au/ Ministers/Media/Bishop/2007/02/b001070207.asp
  5. Australian Learning and Teaching Council. (n.d.). Homepage. Retrieved June 19, 2008, from http://www.altc.edu.au/carrick/go/home
  6. Australian Research Council. (n.d.-a). ARC Profile: Discovery. Retrieved June 19, 2008, from http://www.arc.gov.au/about_arc/arc_profile.htm#discovery
  7. Australian Research Council. (n.d.-b). ARC Profile: Linkages. Retrieved June 19, 2008, from http://www.arc.gov.au/about_arc/arc_profile.htm#linkage
  8. Australian Research Council. (n.d.-c). Linkage infrastructure, equipment and facilities. Retrieved June 19, 2008, from http://www.arc.gov.au/ncgp/lief/lief_default.htm
  9. Australian Research Council. (n.d.-d). Linkage international. Retrieved June 19, 2008, from http://www.arc.gov.au/ncgp/lx/lx_default.htm
  10. Australian Research Council. (n.d.-e). Linkage learned academies special projects. Retrieved June 19, 2008, from http://www.arc.gov.au/ncgp/lasp/lasp_default.htm
  11. Australian Research Council. (n.d.-f). Linkage projects. Retrieved June 19, 2008, from http://www.arc.gov.au/ncgp/lp/lp_default.htm
  12. Baggott la Velle, L.,&Erduran, S. (2007). Arguments and developments in the science curriculum. School Science Review, 88(324), 31–39.Google Scholar
  13. Baumert, J., Bayrhuber, H., Brackhahn, B., Demuth, R., Durner, H. Fischer, H.E., et al. (1998). Gutachten zur Vorbereitung des Programms: Steigerung der Effizienz des mathematischnaturwissenschaftlichen Unterrichts, Materialien zur Bildungsplanung und zur Forschung-sförderung [Expertise for preparing the program for increasing the efficiency of teaching mathematics and the sciences. Materials for Educational Planning and Research Promotion]. Bonn, Germany: Bund-Länder Commission for Educational Planning and Research Promotion. Available from http://www.bik-bonn.de/papers/heft60.pdf [in German]
  14. Campbell Collaboration. (n.d.). Homepage. Retrieved October 3, 2007, from http://www. campbellcollaboration.org
  15. Canada Department of Finance. (2007). Budget 2007: Aspire to a stronger, safer, better Canada. Retrieved June 18, 2008, from http://www.budget.gc.ca/2007/bp/bptoce.html
  16. Canada Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council. (2006). Centres for Research in Youth, Science Teaching and Learning (CRYSTAL) selected. Retrieved June 18, 2008, from http://www.nserc.gc.ca/about/initiatives/initiatives_articlejune_2_e.htm
  17. Canada Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council. (n.d.-a). Homepage. Retrieved June 18, 2008, from http://www.nserc.gc.ca/index.htm
  18. Canada Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council. (n.d.-b). Use of grant fundsCentres for Research in Youth, Science Teaching and Learning (CRYSTAL). Retrieved June 20, 2008, from http://www.nserc.gc.ca/about/initiatives/crystal_funds_e.htm
  19. Canada Networks of Centres of Excellence. (n.d.). Homepage. Retrieved June 18, 2008, from http://www.nce.gc.ca/
  20. Canada Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council. (n.d.-a). Apply for funding: Policies governing INE programs. Retrieved June 18, 2008, from http://www.sshrc.ca/web/apply/policies/regulations_ine_e.asp
  21. Canada Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council. (n.d.-b). Homepage. Retrieved June 18, 2008, from http://www.sshrc.ca/web/home_e.asp
  22. Canada Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council. (n.d.-c). Standard research grants: Regulations governing grant applications. Retrieved June 18, 2008, from http://www.sshrc.ca/ web/apply/program_descriptions/standard_e.asp
  23. Canadian Centre for Knowledge Mobilisation. (n.d.). Homepage. Retrieved June 20, 2008, from http://www.cckm.ca/index2.htm
  24. Canadian Centre for Research on Literacy. (n.d.). Homepage. Retrieved June 18, 2008, from http://www.uofaweb.ualberta.ca/elementaryed/ccrl.cfm
  25. Canadian Council on Learning. (n.d.). Homepage. Retrieved June 18, 2008, from http://www.ccl-cca.ca/CCL/Home/index.htm?Language=EN
  26. Canadian Institutes of Health Research. (n.d.). Homepage. Retrieved June 18, 2008, from http://www.cihr-irsc.gc.ca/e/193.html
  27. Canadian Language and Literacy Research Network. (n.d.). Homepage. Retrieved June 18, 2008, from http://www.cllrnet.ca/
  28. Clynick, T.,&Lee, R. (2004). From laggard to world class: Reforming maths and science in South Africa's schools [CDE Research no. 13]. Johannesburg, South Africa: Centre for Development and Enterprise. Available from http://www.cde.org.za/article.php?a_id=50
  29. Education Sciences Reform Act of 2002. Pub. L. No. 107–279, 116 Stat. 1940. (2002).Google Scholar
  30. European Commission. (2006). Decision No 1982/2006/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council. Retrieved June 20, 2008, from http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ. do?uri=OJ:L:2006:412:0001:0041:EN:PDF
  31. European Commission. (2007a). The European research area: New perspectives [Green paper]. Retrieved June 18, 2008, from http://ec.europa.eu/research/era/pdf/era_gp_final_en.pdf
  32. European Commission. (2007b). Science in society work programme 2008: Capacities. Retrieved June 18, 2008, from http://cordis.europa.eu/fp7/wp_en.html#capacities
  33. European Commission. (n.d.). The Bologna process: Towards the European higher education area. Retrieved June 18, 2008, from http://ec.europa.eu/education/policies/educ/bologna/ bologna_en.html
  34. Evidence for Policy and Practice Information and Co-ordinating Centre. (n.d.). Homepage. Retrieved June 20, 2008, from http://eppi.ioe.ac.uk/cms/
  35. Ford, C. L., Yore, L. D.,&Anthony, R. J. (1997). Reforms, visions, and standards: A cross-curricular view from an elementary school perspective. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service ED406168).Google Scholar
  36. German Biologie im Kontext. (n.d.). Homepage. Retrieved June 18, 2008, from http://bik.ipn.uni-kiel.de/typo3/index.php?id=3 [in German]
  37. German Chemie im Kontext. (n.d.). Homepage. Retrieved June 18, 2008, from http://www.chik. de/ [in German]
  38. German Federal Ministry of Education and Research. (2007a). Rahmenprogramm zur Förderung der empirischen Bildungsforschung [Framework concept to strengthen empirical educational research]. Retrieved June 18, 2008, from http://www.bmbf.de/pub/foerderung_der_ empirischen_bildungsforschung.pdf [in German]
  39. German Federal Ministry of Education and Research. (2007b). Research at a glance—The German research landscape. Retrieved June 18, 2008, from http://www.uni-mainz.de/ downloads_nsm/bmbf_research_at_a_glance.pdf
  40. German Federal Ministry of Education and Research. (n.d.). Innovation in education. Retrieved June 18, 2008, from http://www.bmbf.de/en/1076.php
  41. German Institute for Adult Education. (n.d.). Homepage. Retrieved June 18, 2008, from http://www.die-bonn.de/portrait/english/index.htm
  42. German Institute for International Educational Research. (n.d.). Homepage. Retrieved June 18, 2008, from http://www.dipf.de/ueber_uns_e.htm
  43. German IPN—Leibniz Institute for Science Education. (n.d.). Homepage. Retrieved June 18, 2008, from http://www.ipn.uni-kiel.de/index_eng.html
  44. German Knowledge Media Research Center. (n.d.). Homepage. Retrieved June 18, 2008, from http://www.iwm-kmrc.de/www/en/index.html
  45. German Leibniz Gemeinschaft. (n.d.). Homepage. Retrieved June 19, 2008, from http://www.wgl. de/?nid=ubu&nidap [in German]
  46. German Lernort Labor. (n.d.). Homepage. Retrieved June 18, 2008, from http://www.lernort-labor. de/ [in German]
  47. German Physik im Kontext. (n.d.). Homepage. Retrieved June 18, 2008, from http://www.uni-kiel. de/piko/ [in German]
  48. Great Britain University Grants Committee. (1984). A strategy for higher education into the 1990s: The university grants committee's advice. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
  49. Hand, B., Prain, V.,&Yore, L. D. (2001). Sequential writing tasks' influence on science learning. In G. Rijlaarsdam (Series Ed.)&P. Tynjälä, L. Mason,&K. Lonka (Eds.), Writing as a learning tool: Integrating theory and practice (Vol. 7 of Studies in Writing, pp. 105–129). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  50. Inner London Educational Authority. (1987). Science in process: Be scientific. Oxford, UK: Heinemann.Google Scholar
  51. Klieme, E., Avenarius, H., Blum, W., Döbrich, P., Gruber, H., Prenzel, M., et al. (2007). Zur Entwicklung nationaler Bildungsstandards—Expertise. [Concerning the development of national education standards]. Bonn, Germany: Federal Ministry of Education and Research. Available from http://www.bmbf.de/pub/zur_entwicklung_nationaler_bildungsstandards.pdf [in German]
  52. Klieme, E.,&Baumert, J. (2001). TIMSS—Impulse für Schule und Unterricht: Forschungsbefunde, Reforminitiativen, Praxisberichte und Video-Dokumentation [Impulses for school and instruction: Evidences, reform initiatives, praxis reports, and video documentation]. Bonn, Germany: Federal Ministry of Education and Research.Google Scholar
  53. Lucas, L. (2006). The research game in academic life. London: Society for Research into Higher Education&Open University Press.Google Scholar
  54. Moreland, J., Jones, A.,&Cowie, B. (2006). Developing pedagogical content knowledge for the new sciences: The example of biotechnology. Teaching Education, 17(2), 143–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. National Centre of Science, Information and Communication Technology, and Mathematics Education for Rural and Regional Australia. (n.d.). Homepage. Retrieved June 19, 2008, from http://www.une.edu.au/simerr/
  56. Nentwig, P. M., Demuth, R., Parchmann, I., Gräsel, C.,&Ralle, B. (2007). Chemie im Kontext: Situating learning in relevant contexts while systematically developing basic chemical concepts. Journal of Chemical Education, 84(9), 1439–1444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. New Zealand Ministry of Education. (n.d.). Homepage. Retrieved June 18, 2008, from http://www.minedu.govt.nz/
  58. New Zealand Ministry of Research, Science and Technology. (n.d.). Homepage. Retrieved June 18, 2008, from http://www.morst.govt.nz/
  59. New Zealand Teaching and Learning Research Initiative. (n.d.). About the TLRI. Retrieved June 19, 2008, from http://www.tlri.org.nz/about.html
  60. Newton, D. P.,&Gott, R. (1989). Process in lower school science textbooks. British Educational Research Journal, 15(3), 249–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. No Child Left Behind Act of 2001. Pub. L. No. 107–110, 115 Stat. 1425. (2002).Google Scholar
  62. Pacific CRYSTAL Project. (n.d.). Homepage. Retrieved June 19, 2008, from http://www.educ. uvic.ca/pacificcrystal/main.html
  63. Prenzel, M. (Ed.). (2007). Studies on the educational quality of schools: The final report on the DFG priority programme. Münster, Germany/New York: Waxmann.Google Scholar
  64. Primary Connections — Linking science with literacy. (n.d.). Homepage. Retrieved June 19, 2008, from http://www.science.org.au/primaryconnections/
  65. Reddy, V., Kanjee, A., Diedericks, G. A. M.,&Winnaar, L. D. (2006). Mathematics and science achievement at South African schools in TIMSS 2003. Cape Town, South Africa: HSRC Press.Google Scholar
  66. Rocard, M., Csermely, P., Jorde, D., Lenzen, D., Walberg-Henriksson, H.,&Hemmo, V. (2007). Science education now: A renewed pedagogy for the future of Europe. Luxembourg, Belgium: European Commission. Available from http://ec.europa.eu/research/science-society/ document_library/pdf_06/report-rocard-on-science-education_en.pdf
  67. Rollnick, M., Adler, J.,&Setati, M. (in press). Who are the mathematics and science education researchers in South Africa? African Journal of Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education.Google Scholar
  68. Schavan, A. (n.d.). Supporting research — Opening future markets. Retrieved June 18, 2008, from http://www.bmbf.de/en/99.php
  69. Sherwood, R. D.,&Hanson, D. L. (2008). A review and analysis of the NSF portfolio in regard to research on science teacher education. Electronic Journal of Science Education, 12(1), 20–38. Retrieved from http://ejse.southwestern.edu/volumes/v12n1/v12n1.pdf
  70. Simkins, C., Rule, S.,&Bernstein, A. (2007). Doubling for growth: Addressing the maths and science challenge in South Africa's schools [CDE Research no. 15]. Johannesburg, South Africa: Centre for Development and Enterprise. Available from http://www.cde.org.za/article. php?a_id=264
  71. South Africa Human Sciences Research Council. (n.d.). Education, science and skills development. Retrieved June 19, 2008, from http://www.hsrc.ac.za/ESSD.phtml
  72. South Africa National Research Foundation. (2007). Homepage. Retrieved April 17, 2008, from http://www.nrf.ac.za/
  73. South Africa National Research Foundation. (n.d.-a). Focus areas: Education and the challenges for change. Retrieved June 19, 2008, from http://www.nrf.ac.za/focusareas/educate/
  74. South Africa National Research Foundation. (n.d.-b). Funding. Retrieved June 19, 2008, from http://www.nrf.ac.za/funding/
  75. South Africa National Research Foundation. (n.d.-c). Monitoring and evaluation. Retrieved June 19, 2008, from http://evaluation.nrf.ac.za/index.htm
  76. State of Queensland, Australia, Department of Education, Training and the Arts. (n.d.). Science state — Smart state spotlight on science 2003–2006. Retrieved June 19, 2008, from http://education.qld.gov.au/publication/science/sciencestate.html
  77. Taiwan Department of Science Education. (2006). Mission. Retrieved April 17, 2008, from http://www.nsc.gov.tw/sci/mp.asp?mp=1
  78. Taiwan Ministry of Education. (n.d.). Homepage. Retrieved June 20, 2008, from http://english. moe.gov.tw/mp.asp?mp=1
  79. Taiwan National Science Council. (n.d.-a). Homepage. Retrieved April 17, 2008, from http://web. nsc.gov.tw/default.asp?mp=7
  80. Taiwan National Science Council. (n.d.-b). Organization. Retrieved June 20, 2008, from http:// web.nsc.gov.tw/ct.asp?xItem=14932&CtNode=3417
  81. United Kingdom Department for Children, Schools and Families. (n.d.). Science, technology, engineering and mathematics programme. Retrieved June 30, 2008, from http://www.dfes.gov.uk/stem/
  82. United Kingdom Department for Education. (1995). Science in the national curriculum. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
  83. United Kingdom Department for Education and Employment. (1999). Science: The national curriculum for England. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
  84. United Kingdom Department for Education and Skills. (2006). Science: The national curriculum for England. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
  85. United Kingdom Department of Education and Science. (1988). Science for ages 5 to 16. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
  86. United Kingdom Economic and Social Research Council. (n.d.). Homepage. Retrieved June 30, 2008, from http://www.esrcsocietytoday.ac.uk/ESRCInfoCentre/opportunities/current_fund- ing_opportunities/research/
  87. United Kingdom Higher Education Funding Council for England. (n.d.). Homepage. Retrieved June 19, 2008, from http://www.hefce.ac.uk/
  88. United Kingdom HM Treasury. (2004). Science&innovation investment framework 2004–2014. Retrieved June 19, 2008, from http://www.hm-treasury.gov.uk./spending_review/spend_sr04/ associated_documents/spending_sr04_science.cfm
  89. United Kingdom National Curriculum Council. (1991). Science in the national curriculum: A report to the Secretary of State for Education and Science on the statutory consultation for attainment targets and programmes of study in science. London: Author.Google Scholar
  90. United Kingdom Research Councils. (n.d.). Homepage. Retrieved June 19, 2008, from http://www.rcuk.ac.uk/default.htm
  91. United States Department of Education. (2007). Fiscal year 2008 budget summary. Retrieved June 17,2008, from http://www.ed.gov/about/overview/budget/budget08/summary/edlite-section2f.html United States Department of Education. (n.d.). Homepage. Retrieved June 17, 2008, from http://www.ed.gov/index.jhtml
  92. United States Institute of Education Sciences. (2008). Education research grants CFDA number: 84.305A. Retrieved June 17, 2008, from http://ies.ed.gov/funding/pdf/2009_84305A.pdf
  93. United States Institute of Education Sciences. (n.d.-a). Homepage. Retrieved June 17, 2008, from http://ies.ed.gov/
  94. United States Institute of Education Sciences. (n.d.-b). Mission and goal. Retrieved June 17, 2008, from http://ies.ed.gov/director/
  95. United States Institute of Education Sciences. (n.d.-c). What works clearinghouse: Homepage. Retrieved June 20, 2008, from http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/
  96. United States National Science Board of the National Science Foundation. (n.d.). Homepage. Retrieved June 17, 2008, from http://www.nsf.gov/nsb/
  97. United States National Science Foundation. (2006a). FY 2007 budget request to Congress. Retrieved June 17, 2008, from http://www.nsf.gov/about/budget/fy2007/toc.jsp
  98. United States National Science Foundation. (2006b). Program solicitation NSF 08–502. Retrieved June 17, 2008, from http://www.nsf.gov/pubs/2008/nsf08502/nsf08502.pdf
  99. United States National Science Foundation. (2006c). Program solicitation NSF 08–506.Retrieved June 17, 2008, from http://www.nsf.gov/pubs/2008/nsf08506/nsf08506.pdf
  100. United States National Science Foundation. (2007). FY 2008 budget request to Congress. Retrieved June 17, 2008, from http://www.nsf.gov/about/budget/fy2008/index.jsp
  101. United States National Science Foundation. (2008). FY 2009 budget request to Congress. Retrieved June 23, 2008, from http://www.nsf.gov/about/budget/fy2009/toc.jsp
  102. United States National Science Foundation. (n.d.-a). About education and human resources. Retrieved June 17, 2008, from http://nsf.gov/ehr/about.jsp
  103. United States National Science Foundation. (n.d.-b). Homepage. Retrieved June 17, 2008, from http://www.nsf.gov/
  104. University of Essen-Duisburg. (n.d.). Research group and graduate school: Teaching and learning of science. Retrieved June 18, 2008, from http://www.uni-essen.de/nwu-essen/dox/13.1178. hgF9v.H.En.php
  105. Venkatkrishnan, H., Adler, J., Rollnick, M., Setati, M.,&Vhurumuku, E. (in press). Mathematics and science education research, policy and practice in South Africa: What are the relationships? African Journal of Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education. Yore, L. D., Pimm, D.,&Tuan, H.-L. (2007). The literacy component of mathematical and scientific literacy. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 5(4), 559–589.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media B.V 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hsiao-Ching She
    • 1
    Email author
  • Larry D. Yore
    • John O. Anderson
      • 2
    • Sibel Erduran
      • 3
    • Wolfgang Gräber
      • 4
    • Alister Jones
      • 5
    • Johannes Klumpers
      • 6
    • Stephen Parker
      • 6
    • Marissa Rollnick
      • 7
    • Robert D. Sherwood
      • 8
    • Bruce Waldrip
      • 9
    1. 1.Institute of EducationNational Chiao Tung UniversityHsinchuTaiwan
    2. 2.Department of Educational PsychologyUniversity of VictoriaBritish ColumbiaCanada
    3. 3.Science EducationUniversity of BristolUK
    4. 4.Leibniz-Institute for Science EducationUniversity of KielGermany
    5. 5.Centre for Science & Technology Education ResearchUniversity of WaikatoHamiltonNew Zealand
    6. 6.Directorate-General ResearchEuropean CommissionBrusselsBelgium
    7. 7.Marang Centre for Science & Mathematics EducationUniversity of the WitwatersandJohannesburgSouth Africa
    8. 8.Department of Curriculum & InstructionIndiana UniversityBloomingtonUSA
    9. 9.Faculty of EducationUniversity of Southern QueenslandToowoombaAustralia

    Personalised recommendations