Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Logic, Epistemology, and The Unity of Science ((LEUS,volume 11))

Abstract

A current ideology has it that different cultural traditions have privileged sources of insight and ways of knowing. Prizing one tradition over another would reek of cultural imperialism. In this vein we have those pushing for a unique status for Islamic philosophy: it should have its rightful place alongside Western philosophy—and no doubt alongside Chinese philosophy, Indian philosophy, African philosophy…. I begin by examining what could be meant by ‘Islamic philosophy’. I argue that embracing a multiculturalism that makes the philosophic enterprise relative to particular cultural traditions ignores a quite important part of the Islamic philosophical tradition itself: the quest for a transcultural, universal objectivity. The major Islamic philosophers embraced this ideal: al-Fārābī and Ibn Sīnā (Avicenna), for instance. They held that some cultures are better than others at attaining philosophical wisdom, and some languages better than others at expressing it. They advocated selecting critically features from the different cultures for constructing a general theory. I illustrate their method by considering their treatment of paronymy and the copula. I end by advocating a return to this Islamic tradition.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 229.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 299.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 299.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Abed, S.: 1996, “Language” in History of Islamic Philosophy, ed. Nasr & Leaman, Routledge, pp. 898–925.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ackrill, J. L.: 1963, Aristotle’s Categories and De Interpretatione, Oxford, Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Al-Fārābī: 1960, Al-‘Ibāra, ed. Kutsch & Morrow, Beirut.

    Google Scholar 

  • Al-Fārābī: 1960, Sharḥ al-Fārābī li-kitāb Aristūtālīs fī l-‘ibāra, W. Kutsch and S. Marrow (eds.), Beirut. Engl. transl. see Zimmermann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Al-Fārābī: 1968, Ihṣā’ al-‘ulūm, ed. Amin, Beirut.

    Google Scholar 

  • Al-Fārābī: 1957, “Introductory Risalah on Logic”, ed. D. M. Dunlop, Islamic Quarterly, Vol. 4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Al-Fārābī: 1969, Kitāb al-Ḥur#x0016B;f, ed. M. Mahdi, Beirut.

    Google Scholar 

  • Al-Fārābī: 1958, “Paraphrase of the Categories of Aristotle”, ed. & trans. D. M. Dunlop, Islamic Quarterly, Vol. IV.4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Al-Fārābī: 1955, “Al-Fārābī’s Introductory Sections on Logic”, ed. & trans. D M Dunlop, Islamic Quarterly, Vol. 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Al-Rāzī: 1939, Al-Munāżarāt, in Abi Mohammadi filii Zachariae Roghensis opera philosophica gragmentaque quae supersunt, Cairo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ammonius: 1897, In Aristotelis De Interpretatione Commentarius, ed. A. Busse, Commentaria in Aristotelem Graeca, Vol. 4.5, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Avicenna: 1959, Al-Maqūlāt (Part One, Volume Two of Al-Shifā’), ed. G. Anawati, A. El-Ehwani, M. El-Khodeiri, & S. Zayed, Cairo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Avicenna: 1970, Al-’Ibāra (Part One, Volume Three of Al-Shifā’), ed. M. Al-Khudayri, Cairo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bäck, A.: 2000, Aristotle’s Theory of Predication, Leiden, Brill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Badawi, E., M.C. Carter and A. Gully: 2004, Modern Written Arabic: A Comprehensive Grammar, London, Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benveniste, E: 1966, “Catégoires de pensée et catégoires de langue” in Problèmes de linguistique générale, Paris, Gallimard, Vol. 1, pp. 63–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Boer, R. J.: 1903, The History of Philosophy in Islam, trans. E. R. Jones, London, Luzac; repr. 1967, New York, Dover.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dionysius T.: 1883, Ars Grammatica, Grammatici Graeci, Part I., Vol. 1, ed. G. Uhlig, Leipzig.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elamrani-Jamal, A.: 1983, Logique aristotélicienne et grammaire arabe, Paris, J. Vrin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Endress, G.: 1987, “Die Wissenschaftliche Literatur” in H. Gätje (ed.), Grundrisse der Arabischen Philologie, Wiesbaden, Vol. 2, pp. 423–431.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, W.: 2002, A Grammar of Classical Arabic, Third Edition, trans. J. Rodgers, New Haven, Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, W. (ed.): 1993, Grundrisse der Arabischen Philologie, Vol. III, Wiesbaden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank, D. and O. Leaman: 2003, The Cambridge Companion to Medieval Jewish Philosophy, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gauthier, L.: 1923, Introduction à l’étude de la philosophie musulmane: l’esprit sémitique et l’esprit aryen, la philosphie greque et la religion de l’islam, Paris, E. Leroux.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, L.: 1998, “Jewish Philosophy”, Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, A. C.: 1986, Relating Categories to Question Forms in Pre-Han Chinese Thought: Studies in Chinese Philosophy and Philosophical Literature, Singapore; reprint of [1960, The Verb Be and its Synonyms, Philosophical and Grammatical Studies, Part VI, (Dordrecht 1967)].

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, A. C.: 1989, Disputers of the Tao: Philosophical Argument in Ancient China, La Salle, Open Court.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grice, H. P.: 1975, “Logic and Conversation” in P. Cole & J. Morgan (eds), Syntax and Semantics, Vol. 3: Speech Acts, Academic Press, New York, pp. 41–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutas, D.: 1988, Avicenna and the Aristotelian Tradition, Leiden, Brill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutas, D.: 1988, Greek Thought, Arabic Culture: The Graeco-Arabic Translation Movement in Bagdad and Early ‘Abbāsid Society (2nd-4th/8th-10thcenturies), Oxon/New York, Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutas, D.: 2002, “The Study of Arabic Philosophy in the Twentieth Century”, British Journal of Middle eastern Studies, Vol. 29.1, 5–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jullien, F.: 2001, Du ‘temps’: elements d’une philosophie de vivre, Paris, Grasset.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laudan, L.: 1977, Progress and its Problems, Berkeley, University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leaman, O.: 1985, An Introduction to Medieval Islamic Philosophy, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leaman, O.: 1988, Averroes and his Philosophy, Oxford, Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Libera de, A. and Hayoun, M-R.: 1991, Averroès et l’Averroïsme, Paris, Que sait-je? Presses Universitaires de France.

    Google Scholar 

  • Madkour, I.: 1969 L’Organon d’Aristote dans le monde arabe, seconde édition, Paris, Vrin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahdi, M.: 1990, “Orientalism and the Study of Islamic Philosophy”, Journal of Islamic Studies, Vol. 1, 73–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merz, A.: 1889, Historia artis grammaticae apud Syros, Leipzig, pp. 137–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nasr, S. and O. Leaman (eds.): 1996, History of Islamic Philosophy, London, Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ortega y G.: 1914, J., Meditaciones del Quijote, Madrid, trans. E. Rugg and D. Marín, 1961, Meditations on Quixote, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Priscian: 1855, “Institutionum grammaticarum libri XVIII” in M. Hertz (ed.), Grammatici Latini, Volumes 2 and 3, ed. Heinrich Keil, Leipzig, Teubner; repr. 1981, Hildesheim and New York, Georg Olms.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quine, W. V. O.: 1960, Word and Object, Cambridge Mass., MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reding, J-P.: 2004, Comparative Essays in Early Greek and Chinese Rational Thinking, Aldershot, Ashgate Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renan, E.: 1949, Averroès et l’Averroïsme, Oeuvres complètes, Tome III, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sabra, A. I.: 1987, “The Appropriation and Subsequent Naturalization of Greek Science in Medieval Islam: A Preliminary Statement”, History of Science, Vol. 25, pp. 223–243.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sabra, A. I.: 1980, “Avicenna on the Subject Matter of Logic”, Journal of Philosophy 77, p. 746–764.

    Google Scholar 

  • Said, E.: 1993, Culture and Imperialism, New York, Alfred A. Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Said, E.: 1978, Orientalism, New York, Pantheon Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sapir, E.: 1956, ”The Status of Linguistics as a Science” in Selected Writings of Edward Sapir in Language, Culture and Personality, Berkeley, University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simplicius: 1907, In Aristotelis CategoriasCommentarium, ed. C. Kalbfleisch, Commentaria in Aristotelis Graeca, Vol. 8, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smyth, H.: 1956, Greek Grammar, revised by G. Messing, Cambridge Mass., Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stephanos: 1885, In Librum Aristotelis De InterpretationeCommentarium, ed. M. Hayduck, Commentaria in Aristotelem Graeca, Vol. 18.3, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Versteegh, C. H. M.: 1977, Greek Elements in Arabic Linguistic Thinking, Leiden, Brill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walzer, R.: 1962, Greek into Arabic: Essays on Islamic Philosophy, New York, Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walzer, R.:.1970, “L’éveil de la philosophie islamique”, Revue des Etudes Islamiques, Vol. 38.1–2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whorf, B.: 1956, Language, Thought, and Reality, Cambridge Mass., MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein, L.: 1953, Philosophical Investigations, New York, Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, W.: 1964, A Grammar of the Arabic Language, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmermann, F.W.: 1981, Al-Farabi’s Commentary and Short Treatise on Aristotle’s “De interpretatione”, translated with an Introduction and Notes, London, The British Academy Classical and Medieval Logic Texts 3.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bäck, A. (2008). Islamic Logic?. In: Rahman, S., Street, T., Tahiri, H. (eds) The Unity of Science in the Arabic Tradition. Logic, Epistemology, and The Unity of Science, vol 11. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8405-8_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics